On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 04:09:58PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
> Correct. IPF is unstable with our SMP (most of the time) - based 5.x
> boxes. VERY unstable. VERY VERY unstable.
Hm, this sounds bad. What is debug.mpsafenet set to? How big is traffic?
I have one SMP box with ipnat, routing so
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 10:28:53AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> critical:
> kern/60313 (silent data corruption on block devices)
>still open, may be FreeBSD 4 specific after the GEOM flurry
>in FreeBSD 5 and 6.
>
> serious:
> bin/71453 (tcpdump ipv6 crash, trivial fix -
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 05:50:10PM +0100, NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
> > Linux emulation is for userland apps, IPTables won't work.
> user-mode-linux is userland. Does it work with freebsd linux emulation?
UML relies on host Linux kernel.
Only some Linux syscalls are emulated under FreeBSD.
UML h
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 08:12:38PM +0900, Rob wrote:
> I don't have, and I'm not interested in kernel crashes.
> In that case, is there no difference between the use of
> swap partition and swapfile?
Performance I guess (more abstraction layers because swapfile
is accessed via filesystem).
--
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 07:46:45PM +0900, Rob wrote:
> So, why not using swapfile without swap partition at all.
> Have it on a big partition with lots of space. If there's a
> problem with the space, I can easily move the swap elsewhere.
> A swapfile is so much more flexible.
>
> Is there a down
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 02:19:25AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> im trying to get some use of the linux emulation :), ive got a debian box
> just for iptables tryouts (thats a waste of a machine:). i guess the best
> choice is to get it to work in my fbsd5 and play there, but,
> linux_base-deb
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:30:33PM +0100, Derkjan de Haan wrote:
> >I can't seem to find any PR matching this problem, however...
> I have just filed my first PR. Let's see how it goes.
Duplicates PR 70492.
--
Paweł Małachowski
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:05:50AM -0700, Greg White wrote:
> Not as of Sept. 15th, for sure, and I've not seen any other list
> traffic on the subject, either here or on the ipfilter list. I
> re-cvsup'd the morning of the 16th with the 15th's code and
> buildworld/installworld-ed, hoping that th
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:42:14AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> Hi, can you clarify that
>
> >My rc.local script is something like:
> >LAN0=fxp0
> >IP=192.168.x.y
> >ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${IP}/24
> >route add default 192.168.x.1
> >ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${A}/28
> >ifconfig ${LAN0} inet ad
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:16:07AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> What if you alias those IP address to lo0 ? Does it correct the problem ?
I've moved all /32 addresses from fxp0 to lo0, it doesn't fix the problem.
After first reboot route table was complete, however after second reboot
default rou
10 matches
Mail list logo
