> > > DWC> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:35:41AM -0600, Jason Porter wrote:
> > > >> glibc-2.1.2-11. It finally exists with an Error code 1 and stops the
> > > >> install. Anyone else have this problem?
> > >
> > > DWC> This happens sometimes when there are leftovers in /compat/linux from
> > >
> DWC> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:35:41AM -0600, Jason Porter wrote:
> >> glibc-2.1.2-11. It finally exists with an Error code 1 and stops the
> >> install. Anyone else have this problem?
>
> DWC> This happens sometimes when there are leftovers in /compat/linux from
> DWC> linux_base-6, if yo
> > Also, even *I* can't find answers to my questions with 30 minutes, and I
> > know where to look, so I find you statement, well, to be brutally
> > honest, both humerous and a little bit egotistical. :
>
> man rc.conf:
>
> firewall_enable
>(bool) Set to ``NO'' if you
> Could you please explain how the following makes sense?
>
> 1) I enable ipfw in my kernel
> 2) I do not configure it to allow by default
> 3) I reboot with firewall_enable="NO"
> 4) The firewall defaults to allow
>
> If I set the default in my kernel config to deny, the
> : If I enable the clutch in my car, my car moves (assuming it's in gear).
> : If I disable it, the power is no longer going to the drive wheels.
>
> That's not quite right, but it is a good analogy. If you disable your
> clutch, then you are going to have to shift without it and deal with
> pu
> Note that "do not enable firewall" (which is implied by firewall_enable="NO")
> is *not* equivalent to "disable firewall".
Maybe we're having an English language question.
If something isn't enabled, doesn't that imply that it's disabled? Last
I checked, enabled/disabled were binary operatio
> > > > See above. It can easily be done in a more standard way. (One can
> > > > argue that the '-z' should be the default flag, but so far I've failed
> > > > to convince Warner of this fact. :) :)
> > >
> > > Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but the pccard_ether script (when last I
> > > looked at
> > See above. It can easily be done in a more standard way. (One can
> > argue that the '-z' should be the default flag, but so far I've failed
> > to convince Warner of this fact. :) :)
>
> Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but the pccard_ether script (when last I
> looked at it) seems to assume ex
> You still haven't responded to my comment that I have it setup like
> this on some of my boxes so that I can do things that don't fit in
> well with the current firewall paradigm. Nor to my comment that we
> shouldn't be changing a security feature in a fail*UN*safe way.
Explain to me how disa
> I think you should MFC this, Nate.
I too think it should be merged, but I wanted to get Jayanth's feedback
first.
Nate
>
> :We've been using FreeBSD boxes as our reference ftp servers at work, and
> :because of the recent security issues, I've went through and updated a
> :number of our
> > Also, I get "/kernel: csa: card is unknown/invalid SSID (CS4610) and
> > "/kernel: csa0: mem
> > 0x5000-0x500f,0x5010-0x5010f irq 11 at device 6.0 on
> pci0".
> >
> > - I have a Thinkpad 600e (2645-4au) with the CS4610 PCI Accelerator and a
> > CS4239 ISA audio sound chip.
>
> > But now I am getting spontaneous rebooting of the computer.
>
> I'm seeing the same on my Thinkpad T22 -- pccard works again, but the
> machine's spontaneously rebooting after a while when I use a pcmcia
> WaveLAN card. It's a bit unfortunate. It doesn't reboot if I use the
> mini-PCI fxp car
> > The FreeBSD core team and Darren Reed have agreement in principle that
> > we can keep the sources in the source tree. We're still working on
> > the details, but the amount of attention this issue is getting is just
> > getting people needlessly upset.
>
> Is the license going to be modifie
> > It is being pulled from OpenBSD for what seems like a pretty good reason to
> > me.
> >
> > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/05/28/1225224&mode=nested
> >
> > This is really quite sad as IPFilter really is a nice piece of software.
>
> The FreeBSD core team and Darren Reed have agreement
> P.S. I am considering changing it back to non-polling given the
> problems. But that has other problems (eg on some Compaq? machines
> you want to use 3, but using 10 will wedge the machine).
One of the 'biggest' reasons is that there isn't any good 'default' to
use for polling. I had code i
[ PCIC defaults to polling mode ]
> There are six million brands of laptop in the world. To be honest,
> this thread is basically the first one to say that there's something
> wrong. PAO3 has done this for some time, if I understand thigns
> correctly, and hasn't reported problems.
FWIW, I swi
> In dealing with the Netscape issue, I was reminded of the latest Java
> implementation on v1.3 of the JDK/JRE. Has there been effort to
> add Java JDK/JRE v1.3 to -current or possible -STABLE?!?
Because Java is not open-source, it will never become a default part of
the FreeBSD OS.
An external
> : That's wrong. 'shutdown now' takes you to single user mode. 'shutdown -r now'
> : will make it reboot.
>
> That's changed since the last time I did shutdown then :-). Of
> course, that was 5 years ago or so...
It's been that way since 4.3BSD, at least. Not sure which OS you were
using at
> : > : [1]
> : > : --> reboot <--
> : > :
> : [...]
> : > : This line should be "shutdown now", isn't it? Any further suggestions to
> : > : make life of Warner easier?
> : >
> : > No. It should be "reboot" since that's the simplest thing. "shutdown
> : > now" do
>I'm having a bit of trouble with getting an APC Back-UPS Pro running on
> freebsd. It seems to be working with upsd from the ports collection. But
> every while I get a whole load of lines looking like this:
> upsd[355]: apc_tune: negative repsonse: N
> upsd[355]: apc_tune: negative repsonse
> > >I got the same failures last night. Is it common to make commits to the
> > >-stable branch without attempting a build?
> > >
> > >Don't get my tone wrong, I'm just curious about the FreeBSD
> > >development process.
> >
> > I track it fairly often and no, its not common. More common ar
> [about my 3c589D card troubles]
>
> John> Is it a combo card? If so, you might have to set the media for
> John> it to work right.
>
> The media is set to 10BaseT/UTP
How do you know? At least with the older driver, different versions of
the card required different link flags, despite what
Any idea what would cause this? A co-worker is debugging a C++ program,
and this sort of things works fine under 2.2, but doesn't work under
3.X.
> The "-static" linker flag did not appear to change anything.
> Any additional insights would be greatly appreciated.
>
> FreeBSD Version: 3.3
> > ok, so how would i deny access to an entire C-Class?
>
> Put "198.64.0 REJECT" in your access database (substituting
> the appropriate first three octets for the Class C network in
> question, of course), and then re-run makemap to update the access
> database.
Ok, how do
> > I am sorry. A report just came in, and I now have to conclude
> > that the last minutes MFC of moused was ill-conceived. That supposed
> > improvement on the 3 button emulation actually broke the wheel/roller
> > support in moused ;-< (Moused is now broken in both -CURRENT and
> > -STABLE.)
25 matches
Mail list logo
