Morgan
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 5:47 AM Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 8 Jan 2019, at 12:50, Morgan Reed wrote:
> >
> > Just did a find across /usr for the file and it's definitely there so I'm
> > not sure why the compiler can't find it :/
>
> Please pos
2/7.4.0/include/x86intrin.h
/usr/local/llvm60/lib/clang/6.0.1/include/x86intrin.h
/usr/lib/clang/6.0.0/include/x86intrin.h
This system's been around the block (started out as 9.3 I think, had a few
upgrades over the years) which would explain the gcc7 stuff.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 6:52 PM Morga
Hi All,
Finally got around to upgrading my NAS which was running FreeBSD 10.4
to a supported version (11.2).
Ran into an issue when I came to do a portupgrade -a to update all my
installed ports, a number of the ports are failing with "x86intrin.h No
such file or directory", not sure what's
In all likelihood the process wasn't "hung" per-se, more likely random
hadn't been seeded yet and as such you *can't* get 4096b of entropy out of
it (so the process was attempting to do its job, just nothing on the
device).
The issue is basically that there are very few "good" entropy sources in a
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Morgan Reed
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> On 09/03/2016 06:54, Morgan Reed wrote:
>> > I am mounting the third pool under an alternate root, if that has any
>> > bearing on things.
>>
&
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 09/03/2016 06:54, Morgan Reed wrote:
> > I am mounting the third pool under an alternate root, if that has any
> > bearing on things.
>
> It does. A pool imported under an alternative root (-R option) is not
>
OT show the third
storage pool, although it is presently imported and mounted.
I am mounting the third pool under an alternate root, if that has any
bearing on things.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Morgan Reed
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://list
SOLVED: Thanks all for your assistance.
SUMMARY:
- Kernel rebuilt with option IPFIREWALL and friends turned on (not
necessary if your ipfw modules work you should just be able to load
them, mine didn't for reasons I don't really have the time or
inclination to track down)
- OpenVPN configuration
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Morgan Reed wrote:
> Works like a charm, just one last thing I'd like to get squared away
> here though, currently OpenVPN is using a dynamically created tun
> device, I'd like to have a static /dev/tun0 exist prior to the
> /etc/rc.d/natd st
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Morgan Reed wrote:
>> And with ipfw nat you won't be needing ipdivert. Again, no harm.
>
> Yeah, I didn't think it should be necessary but something was trying
> to load it from within the jails and throwing an error, probably the
> n
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
> Unless you needed to include FIREWALL_FORWARD, you really didn't need to
> build ipfw into the kernel, it's all loadable by module. No harm, but.
The ipfw_nat module was causing an instant panic at load and I was
going to have to rebuild my ker
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Morgan Reed wrote:
> So it turns out I'd not bought bpf into the jails, however even with
> that and raw_sockets enabled I'm still having no joy with natd.
>
> I've been looking at ipfw a bit today but I've run into an issue,
> l
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Why not just load the module?
Yeah, you got beaten to the punch on that one offlist, it's late in
the day here ;)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Morgan Reed wrote:
> So it turns out I'd not bought bpf into the jails, however even with
> that and raw_sockets enabled I'm still having no joy with natd.
>
> I've been looking at ipfw a bit today but I've run into an issue,
> l
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Morgan Reed wrote:
> BPF is enabled for the jails, and the traffic is getting to where it
> needs to (but not via natd). I'll try enabling raw_sockets in the
> jails, it is entirely conceivable that natd requires that
> functionality.
So it
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Teske, Devin
wrote:
> I have created a boot script for managing vimages (downloadable as a FreeBSD
> package) and made a little write-up on how to use it...
> http://druidbsd.sf.net/vimage.shtml
As noted elsewhere, these are VIMAGE jails, but I'm managing them
m
Hmm, list was missing from reply-to on this one.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Morgan Reed
Date: Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: natd in a jail
To: Dewayne Geraghty
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dewayne Geraghty
wrote:
> We run a lot of jails with kernel
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Simon Dick wrote:
> I've not used it myself, but this sound like something VIMAGE may be good
> for, basically it's a virtual tcp stack per jail, there's some docs at
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Image but I seem to remember a more up to date one
> elsewhere but can't
Hi All,
I've a bit of an odd query which I hope somebody may be able to
assist with.
I'm looking to set up several OpenVPN tunnels on a single machine
(each residing in its own jail) and route data to different
destinations over different tunnels by selectively routing the traffic
via a part
Hi Andriy,
Scratch that, it would appear to be a PEBKAC issue, looks like I
omitted to actually save sid.h when I made the mods.
Patch is good, I now have access to my whole pool again.
Thanks,
Morgan
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:23, Morgan Reed wrote:
> Hi Andriy,
>
> Thanks
012 at 22:20, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Please see this thread:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2011-December/013215.html
> It looks like the same issue.
> The patch has been committed in head, not sure if it's MFCed.
>
> on 05/02/2012 06:57 Morgan Reed
Hi all,
I'm experiencing an issue in migrating my NAS from OpenSolaris
over to FreeBSD, I've tried both releng_8_2 and releng_9 I have
similar issues in both cases.
The pool is a RAID-Z pool comprising 4 1TB drives, it was originally
created on OpenSolaris (not sure what version, 2010.09 may
Hi all,
I'm currently attempting to setup, I suppose you'd call it a
multi-VPN-tunnel gateway. Basically I have several OpenVPN Servers in
different locations, I want to have various tunnels up to them and be
able to choose an exit by way of pointing my browser at a particular
instance of Sq
don't recall
it being terribly difficult to get this stuff working when I was doing
my original work with 6.3, though I don't recall the use of the
initdiskless script, IIRC I was using rc.diskless2 which (again IIRC)
was later replaced by /etc/rc.d/diskless but I've not been ab
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Nick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It occurs to me that if ad0s1a is insufficient then I could use ad0s1g
> as swap, and repurpose ad0s1b as a new /. Is it straightforward to
> installworld/mergemaster to somewhere other than / ?
The DESTDIR directive will al
On 7/12/07, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
man rc.local on a freebsd 7 box says
Same for 6.2-STABLE.
So, rc.local, though not current is still supported.
Yes, effectively deprecated (although the mechanism may not be removed
for a significant time, if at all).
I'm going to write an rc.d
I'm working on a small footprint semi-embedded system, I need a means
to load and save parts of /var (which is a memory-backed filesystem)
at boot and shutdown.
Given that rc.local is now deprecated, what is the "correct" way to
perform extra startup/shutdown processes, should I write an rc.d
scr
Not sure if this is the most appropriate place to ask, feel free to
redirect me if it isn't.
I've got an issue with a simple NAT with pf.
I've got two machines;
the first (I will call m1) has 2 ethernet interfaces (I will call them
m1.0 and m1.1)
the second (I will call m2) has 1 ethernet interf
I now have my target PXE booting from my FreeBSD host (chalk one up to
not writing config files at ungodly hours of the night, thanks to
Danny for spotting the error.)
The boot is proceeding to the boot menu but after this the kernel freezes;
With acpi.ko in the image the acpi module loads, the n
On 6/25/07, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hope this helps clear up any concern over that part.
Thanks for the explanation, that makes sense.
Unfortunately it still doesn't explain why the file is not being
created, the fact that the dd command is outputting a count for
records o
On 6/25/07, Robert Joosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And next-server
My dhcpd.conf has an appropriate next-server directive, all the
configuration (for the network boot) has been duplicated from the
functional DragonFly boot server.
I have a couple of version 6.2 pxe-clients booting of a 4.1
I'm currently working on an embedded project which will be built
around a BSD (I'm not sure which yet), currently I have an image up
and running DragonFly and I'm currently attempting to do the same with
FreeBSD for comparison.
I'm more or less following the miniBSD tutorials (updating the variou
32 matches
Mail list logo
