On Friday 31 August 2001 02:22 am, Darryl Okahata wrote:
>
> Heh. I'm writing this on an Asus A7M266 (I didn't want to wait for
> the nForce).
Speaking of whichare the freeBSD team working on supporting the nForce
(does anyone know?) or are we going to have to wait for support? (I gue
->On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Mike Porter wrote:
>
>
>Actually, although I'm happy with the current default of enabling SSH for
>now, if there isn't already a sysinstall post-install config twiddle for
>SSH, we should probably add one. To be honest, a "default all off&
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 09:44, Bill Moran wrote:
> Is there a reason why you took this off the list?
>
my mistake (or my mailer's depending on how you look at it). If the
majordomo config file for the list included the line "reply-to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]" then all replies would by defualt go ba
On Wednesday 20 June 2001 14:23, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Interestingly, a REINSTALL of SO 5.2 from ports seemed to fix it,
> after I mv'd all the old stuff away.
>
> This is really wierd..
>
> LER
>
I had that problem a long time ago (moving from 4.2R to 4-stable, IIRC). I
re-ran the user-insta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 12 March 2001 07:56, j mckitrick wrote:
> | The problem is that the card has been reattached, so com->gone is
> | 0. However com->tp is NULL because the driver has not seen an open()
> | since attachment. It would probably be possible to add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
CVSUP'd last night, make buildworld on my way to bed
make buildkernel OK
I learned the Hard Way(tm) to keep a functional kernel backup other than
kernel.old <(}: so:
#cp /kernel /kernel.works
#mv /modules /modules.works
#make installkern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, since sound questions appear to be the topic of the week...
IT occurs to me that perhaps there should be a -sound mailing list? (or am I
missing something and there is already? If so I apologize, as this
rightfully belongs there if there is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Passki, Jonathan P wrote:
>
>
>
I have to agree with the rant, but I think we are straying off topic for
- -stable, and need to either move it completely to -ports or go private. And
I know I'm not one with time or experti
