or reduce amount of swap space.
I allocated 2.0 GB of swap when I installed. This was not a problem
in the past.
Should I ignore this warning or do I need to do something?
--
Michael Gass
mg...@csbsju.edu
unning 9.0-stable on an i386
Last time I updated was in March and that went well.
Do I need to uninstall all my ports and start over?
Do I need to move up to 9.1?
--
Michael Gass
mg...@csbsju.edu
___
free
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 09:26:58PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On May 17, 2013, at 19:56, Michael Gass wrote:
> > Running 9.0-Stable on an i386.
> >
> > Whenever I type a command at the prompt I get
> > the output
> >
> > /usr/local/lib/libintl.so
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:55:13AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:56:53PM -0500, Michael Gass wrote:
> > Running 9.0-Stable on an i386.
> >
> > Whenever I type a command at the prompt I get
> > the output
> >
> > /usr/l
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 07:34:36PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 17/05/2013 18:56, Michael Gass wrote:
> > Running 9.0-Stable on an i386.
> >
> > Whenever I type a command at the prompt I get
> > the output
> >
> > /usr/local/lib/libintl.so
what to try. Any suggestions.
--
Michael Gass
mg...@csbsju.edu
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:13:10AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:25:10 -0500, Michael Gass wrote:
>
> >Cannot get the linux flashplugin to work on either firefox or chrome.
>
> 9-STABLE here without issues.
>
> Can you post:
>
> /etc/rc
Running 9.0 STABLE
Cannot get the linux flashplugin to work on either firefox or chrome.
Followed the handbook exactly. Using ports I installed the following.
* installed nspluginwrapper which also installed linux_base_f10
* installed linux-f10-flashplugin11
* linked libflashplayer.so into /usr/
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:24:29PM -0500, Michael Gass wrote:
> I'm running 7.2-stable and I replaced an old ISA NIC with
> a D-Link DFE-530TX+ card. According to the manual, the
> correct driver for this card is rl driver. The kernel
> insists on using the vr driver which is
I'm running 7.2-stable and I replaced an old ISA NIC with
a D-Link DFE-530TX+ card. According to the manual, the
correct driver for this card is rl driver. The kernel
insists on using the vr driver which is for the DFE-530TX.
>From what I can tell, the two cards have different chipsets
and so t
Just installed 7.2-release in an old Pavilion 4455 (PII, 256M)
and it runs great. Csuped src and ports and rebuilt world and
generic kernel for 7.2-stable and that went well.
My question is why are the files in /etc in 7.2-stable older
versions (generally) than in 7.2-release? I do not just me
11 matches
Mail list logo