Hi all,
this is a really long email, sorry, i try to provide all the
necessary info for you to digg it.
I got a farm with 4 6.0-STABLE boxes which were up and running
since december 2005.
All these boxes were running openldap 2.3.11 with syncrepl, 1
provider, 2 consumer and 1 test box; of these
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:40:19 -0500
"Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sitting on a G450 here. Works great. I've never heard anything
> bad about the 550 either, and it's a bit more capable. But then, the
> 550 is also like 6 years old now (and still >$100 new, and uncommon
> u
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:00:30 -0800
"Matthew Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Helpful information would be:
>
> a) Release
> b) Connection Topology
>
> It looks like you're going through a switch. Your short term solution
> will be to zone your box and the CX300 together excluding all else.
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 12:58 -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> In the 20 months for which layeredtech has been providing free hosting for
> FreeBSD Update, one of the two Portsnap mirrors, and my personal website,
> I haven't had any complaints.
Yes, GREAT service! I've had the possibility to test it
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 13:17 -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> FreeBSD Update is public; if you are running a system which identifies
> itself as i386 running FreeBSD 6.2-BETA1, FreeBSD Update should be able
> to fetch the updates right now.
>
> If it doesn't, something is broken, and I'd like to hea
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 12:12 -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
> A few things to note about BETA1:
>
> - Be aware that FreeBSD-SA-06:21.gzip was released after
> the -BETA1 builds started, and the gunzip(1) binaries
> included are consequently vulnerable to the attacks
> descr
On 6/8/06, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That shouldn't be an issue anymore, but I don't know when that was resolved.
Does anyone take care of what Daniel and Greg have said or read
doc/faq about PF?
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
__
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 09:09 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> No, I meant RELENG_6_1, which is the security fix branch
> for 6.1-Release. Albert wrote that he would prefer not
> to use RELENG_6 (a.k.a. "6-stable") on a production machine,
> therefore my recommendation is RELENG_6_1.
If read right he
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 12:46 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> There have been quite a lot of bug fixes (including NFS-
> related, IIRC) in the weeks before the release. Therefore
> I recommend that you update to RELENG_6_1.
Did you mean RELENG_6, right?
--
Massimo.run();
___
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 16:36 -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 May 2006 16:19, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>
> > I meant 'kern.ipc.shmall', which used to be 'kern.ipc.shmmaxpgs'. :-(
>
> That did it! Bumping kern.ipc.shmall to 65536 got me back up and running
> with enough shared_memory to get
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 16:35 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> If you use snapshots with your quotas, update to 6.1-STABLE. If you
> don't use snapshots, 6.1-R should be fine. This was discussed in
> excruciating depth a few weeks back, so please read the archives for
> more.
Probably I've to stress
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 23:44 -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> ports tree in the process, the end result is a bit more undefined. One
> thing that I wish for is that the ports tree would branch for releases,
> and that those branches would get security updates. I know that this
> would involve an expone
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 10:30 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> There are known locking bottlenecks in the crypto subsystem that fast
> ipsec depends on. This is consistent with idle time going up.
>
> Not sure when they'll be fixed but I know they're important to at least
> one person.
Sorry to corr
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 16:04 +0100, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> I got:
> Failed to open driver node /dev/megadev0
Wait for the new work Joao is doing or better offer to test it ;)
Did you follow discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Massimo.run();
___
fre
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 15:59 +0100, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> Is the kernconf in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf still there and is it real file
> (not
> a symlink to a file on the hostmachine)?
You're right. I know i miss something stupid.
Thanks and sorry for the noise.
--
Massimo.run();
___
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 12:21 +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Are the /etc/make.conf files in sync on client and server?
Yep, they're empty except the KERNCONF definition
> Did you mount /usr/src and /usr/obj with -maproot=0?
No, i export them as
/usr/src /usr/obj -maproot=root -network=10.0.0.0
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 11:58 +0100, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> Did you mount /usr/src from the client?
Sure, i've mounted both /usr/src and /usr/obj with the same name with
maproot options (from exports)
--
Massimo.run();
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
I'm tryng to accomplish this
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/small-lan.html
to have four boxes updated toghether.
I've done almost everything in the docs and have the main machine, the
one who builds world and kernels, do its own work successfully, now with
buildworld an
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 14:27 +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> The em(4) driver in STABLE is now in quite good state. We use it on
> heavy loaded routers. The interrupt storm in the thread you mention
> was probably caused by some bad hardware combination between mainboard
> and NIC.
Thanks Gleb for t
Due to the latest thread on em interrupt storm i would like to know
which is the recommended nic to choose to be deployed on a -STABLE
Read "recommended" as: which works good without known wired behavior and
has produced good performance over a gigabit wire
Ciao
--
Massimo.run();
_
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 12:04 +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> In that case, how do we remove io or mem so that they get in as kld at boot
> time ?
With the nodevice directive.
--
Massimo.run();
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 11:36 +0100, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
> 'DEFAULTS':
>
> device isa
>
> device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices
> device io # I/O devi
22 matches
Mail list logo
