ZFS in devd and fault management

Hi, i'm trying to setup some fault management for ZFS. My first idea would be to use devd. It looks like PCBSD already has some examples for this [1]. Is there any documentation regarding which subsystem and types exist for ZFS ? Regards, Leon [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable

Probable drive failure not recognized by ZFS on mps(4)

Hi, running 9-STABLE from 2 weeks ago i'm having a problem where ZFS is not recognizing a failing SATA disk on an LSI SAS2x36 expander. The gnop(8) device in the zpool status output is for testing purpose. ZFS fails those alright. What could i do to check if the SCSI sense code actually makes sens

Re: SATA 6g 4-port non-RAID controller ?

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:09:25PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > What kind of SATA 6g 4-port non-RAID controller is currently suggested > > > for use in 8/9 setups with large RAM (64G) setups with ZFS ? > > > SuperMicro AOC-USAS2-L8i > > > > PCIe controller with 2 multi-lane connectors

Re: SATA 6g 4-port non-RAID controller ?

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 01:42:07PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > > What kind of SATA 6g 4-port non-RAID controller is currently suggested > > for use in 8/9 setups with large RAM (64G) setups with ZFS ? > > > > SuperMicro AOC-USAS2-L8i > >

Please share your ZFS hotspare solution.

Hi, i'm interested in stories how you guys handle ZFS drive failures. Especially regarding automatic replacement and hot spares. There has already been a lot of discussion about this. If anyone can share some scripts and how to plug them into devd that would be great. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/q

Re: ZFS V28

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote: > I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be MFC to 8-Stable or not. On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote: > I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be MFC to 8-Stable or not. Is there a recent patch

Re: ixgbe(4) and "Could not setup receive structures"

9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) Whats a reasonable amount to set kern.ipc.nmbjumbo9 to and is there any form of auto-tuning (i have absolutely no load on this machine and mbufs are higher than default pool size). Thanks to all, Leon > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Leon

Re: ixgbe(4) and "Could not setup receive structures"

d_head: 1396 dev.ix.0.queue3.rxd_tail: 1395 dev.ix.0.queue3.rx_packets: 1396 dev.ix.0.queue3.rx_bytes: 145665 dev.ix.0.queue3.lro_queued: 0 dev.ix.0.queue3.lro_flushed: 0 > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Leon Meßner > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 03:44:23PM +0200, K. Macy wrote

Re: ixgbe(4) and "Could not setup receive structures"

lls to protocol drain routines > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Leon Meßner > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > i tried setting the mtu on one of my ixgbe(4) intel NICs to support > > jumbo frames. This is on a box with RELENG_8 from today. > > > > # ifconfig ix0 mt

ixgbe(4) and "Could not setup receive structures"

Hi, i tried setting the mtu on one of my ixgbe(4) intel NICs to support jumbo frames. This is on a box with RELENG_8 from today. # ifconfig ix0 mtu 9198 I then get the following error: # tail -n 1 /var/log/messages Apr 14 12:48:43 siloneu kernel: ix0: Could not setup receive structures I alre

Re: Support for Areca ARC-1300-4X on 8-STABLE?

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:28:13PM -0500, Paul Mather wrote: > On Nov 24, 2010, at 7:06 PM, Xin LI wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Paul Mather > > wrote: > >> Thanks for the link! I'm not sure whether "Fixed arcmsr driver prevent > >> arcsas support for Areca SAS HBA ARC13x0" in

freeBSD nullfs together with nfs and "silly rename"

Hi, I hope this is not the wrong list to ask. Didn't get any answers on -questions. When you try to do the following inside a nullfs mounted directory, where the nullfs origin is itself mounted via nfs you get an error: # foo # tail -f foo& # rm -f foo tail: foo: Stale NFS file handle # fg Th