In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you write:
>
>Has anyone else seen anything like this...
>
>panic(c0334f20,c392e400,ff807f44,c021fd76,c392e400) at panic+0xa4
>rtfree(c392e400) at rtfree+0x27
>syncache_free(debe8fc0,6200,debe8fc0,1,debe8660) at syncache_free+0x56
>syncache_drop(debe8fc0,0,1,c02
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 09:48:23AM -0600, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 07:43:32AM -0600, Paul Root wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've recently received a 3COM ethernet card that
> > has the 3XP chip allowing 3DES encryption on board.
> >
> > I see that the card is supported
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>I just did a make world/kernel on a box with an old 10Mbps Intel Pro/10 PCI
>network card. I uncommented the "device miibus" line in my kernel config file
>for the new fxp driver.
>
>dmesg shows this:
>
>fxp0: port 0x8100-0x811f mem
>0xe400
In article you
write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Hi,
>on a pentium 233 IPC with a dual fxp (Intel Pro 100+) card,
>with this ppp configuration:
>
>...
>tdsl:
> set device PPPoE:fxp1
>...
>
>and the attached kernel configuration file (mike)
>I get the following panic:
I would guess that PPPoE here is attem
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
write:
>On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:02:17AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> So it looks like support for the i82562ET vs. the i82555 is broken
>> in some fashion under 4.3-stable.
>
>I am experiencing the same problems in a machine that functions as a
>bridge.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
write:
>At 05:05 PM 5/22/2001 -0700, David Greenman wrote:
>> >Hello all,
>> >
>> >bad news.. Matt is not the only one who had problem with fxp device.
>> >Yesterday I have in dmesg and messages lines like this:
>> >
>> >May 22 16:30:24 db /kernel: fxp0: SCB time
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Is there a way to prevent a machine generating icmp_redirects, actually
>stop it running icmp altogether.
>I have tried the ICMP_DROP_REDIRECT ="YES" in /etc/rc.conf. This I think
>
>affects action on incoming redirects, but does not prevent generation of
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 09:43:37PM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
>
> :> be set with a new api call, setgloblimit()? Or perhaps even just
> :> have the setgloblimit() API call and don't even bother with a new flag.
> :
> :I would think a better idea is to have the system default to a hard
>
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 04:00:34PM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>
> Patch attached.
Oh yeah, this doesn't include the patch to ftpd, which is fairly trivial.
--
Jonathan
Index: ftpd.c
===
RCS file: /ncvs/src/libexec/ft
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you write:
>These glob patches to libc are totally inappropriate. If there is a
>problem with DOS attacks in ftp, the solution is to add a simple API
>call to set the limit (the default being unlimited) and then make ftp use
>it.
Yes, I'm consideri
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>
>> Anyway, please test the heck even more out of this one since we're
>> only 12 days away from the final release candidate! :)
>
>le nic driver is broken in all 4.x versions. Any chance that
>kern/25650 will be commited before 4.3
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
write:
>I've got 30 of those boxes. I was able to install 4.1-RELEASE
>from a bootable CD. 4.1-STABLE doesn't like 4GB of RAM in them though.
>And I'm only using the single processor version.
4.1 should have no problems handling the 4G of memory in the boxes.
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you write:
>hi there,
>we recently received a test machine from Compaq, whose only two
>harddisks live behind a Compaq Smart RAID Array. A Collegue of mine if
>currently trying to install Linux on that machine, whilst i'm up to trying
>to install FreeBSD on it beca
13 matches
Mail list logo
