the information, and since "svnup" is
not "svn", it can't
> get it, thus there's nothing to print.
>
svnversion is the specific binary that is required, but
svnup does not
pull in metadata.
As always, thanks for the insights Glen -- that was the
piece
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:41:46 +0300
Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
On 13.04.2013 11:29, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
The only thing I would like to add -- tree lookup did
make a good effect
on CPU consumption.
John,
I'm just curious, did you consider sys/tree.h for tree
implementation? I realize th
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 11, 2013 1:14:57 PM UTC+6,
mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've placed the patched svnup.c (0.56), the diff and two
statically linked binaries on
http://ftp.ufanet.ru/pub/boco/freebsd/svnup/
I'm sorry, svnup.c.dif
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:28:10 +0300
Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
ok, looks like the mere fix to the strlen() call as you
suggested earlier doesn't resolve the issue of CPU eating
up.
On 12.04.2013 08:43, mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, April 12, 2013 1:09:53 AM UTC+6, Markiyan
Kushnir wrote
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:05:28 +0200
"Patrick M. Hausen" wrote:
Hi, all,
first a big big thank you to John an all others involved
for all the work.
A bit more slowly than cvsup but definitely a lot more
convenient than
using plain subversion. Part of the slow performance may
be due to the
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 05:55:19 +0200
Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
Hello John,
Tested svnup for a while, and I can say it does its job
well, and works basically as I would expect, so thanks
for your initiative. Although it appears to be quite
resource greedy. Most of the time it showed something
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 02:14:30 +1100 (EST)
Ian Smith wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:11:28 -0500, John Mehr wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:29:45 +1100 (EST)
> Ian Smith wrote:
svn0.us-west.freebsd.org as per example, but it's the
closest to here
anyway; pings avg 217.5ms stddev 0.4
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:50:43 -0400
"David Magda" wrote:
On Tue, March 12, 2013 19:32, John Mehr wrote:
This sounds good to me, and as long as there's some sort
of a consensus that we're not breaking the principle of
least surprise, I'm all for it. The one default
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:57:13 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013, John Mehr wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100
"Michael Ross" wrote:
What'd you think about a syntax extension along the
lines of
svnup --bsd-base
svnup --bsd-port
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:29:45 +1100 (EST)
Ian Smith wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:32:28 -0500, John Mehr wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100
> "Michael Ross" wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr
wrote:
[..]
> > > Hello,
&g
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:10:41 -0400
Mark Saad wrote:
---
On Mar 11, 2013, at 9:20 PM, "Michael Ross"
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400
Patrick McEvoy wrote:
Hello John,
This is Patrick the BSDTV guy. If yo
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100
"Michael Ross" wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400
Patrick McEvoy wrote:
Hello John,
This is Patrick the BSDTV guy. If you have the time /
inclination, would you like to do a
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400
Patrick McEvoy wrote:
Hello John,
This is Patrick the BSDTV guy. If you have the time /
inclination, would you like to do a quick walk through
svnup?**If you have a machine that will run Skype, I
could record you doing a walk through including all the
thi
I have investigated the bless command and nothing I find
on google gives me any good ideal on what folder/file to
bless. I am wondering if just using the volume command
and ignoring folder and file would work?
Hello,
If memory serves, I used it in device mode and used the
--setBoot option t
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 14:18:23 -0800
Doug Hardie wrote:
On 7 March 2013, at 11:57, Kevin Oberman
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Doug Hardie
wrote:
On 7 March 2013, at 06:42, Richard Kuhns
wrote:
> On 03/07/13 01:59, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I have a new Mac Mini and have enco
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:31:10 -0800
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> I downloaded it and looked at the source.
>
> svnup.c:1002: warning: zero-length printf format string
> svnup.c:1020: warning: zero-length printf format string
> svnup.c:1027: warning: zero-length printf format
Hello all,
I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup
as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port. With my ~ 350kb/s
DSL connection, it now takes just under 30 minutes to download a fresh
base/releng/8.3 tree using svnup (Subversion's svn takes appr
Hey Jonn, this news is better than my Monday AM coffee.
Once you have something working, however crudely, I'd
love to link/post/reference it on the growing wiki page-
so folks can give it a whirl.
https://wiki.freebsd.org/UsersFetchingSource
(If this project succeeds, it will neatly get rid o
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:47:52 +0100
Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:48:31AM -0500, Isaac (.ike)
> I tried the attached script to download
> http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/ In 27 minutes it
>downloaded 67
> megabytes, corresponding to 42 KByte/sec, th
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:03:35 -0500
"Isaac (.ike) Levy" wrote:
On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:27 PM, John Mehr wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:27:23 +0100
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Also I'd like to mention John Mehr, who's work on a
"lightweight, dependency-free, BSD
this
>topic.
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 07:40:45PM -0600, John Mehr
>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:42:19 +0100 Arrigo Marchiori
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:57:17AM -0800, 'Jeremy
>> >
>> > 1- svns
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:42:19 +0100
Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:57:17AM -0800, 'Jeremy
1- svnsup-distill: takes a revision from svn and creates
a text file
(called a delta) that represents it. It seems to be
almost
complete.
To answer one of John Mehr's prob
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:27:23 +0100
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Also I'd like to mention John Mehr, who's work on a
"lightweight,
dependency-free, BSD licensed program to pull source
using the svn
protocol" (couldn't say it better, so I use his words
:-)). Hop
For testing against svn.freebsd.org -- this is pull only?
So you only
need read permissions on svn.freebsd.org? That's fine:
the SVN
repository is open to public access and you can just use
it without
asking permission. Although I'd use one of the mirror
sites listed in
the handbook rather t
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:34:33 +1100
"Dewayne"
wrote:
The objective is to return to a base build of FreeBSD
that performs the expected task of being able to pull
source, without having
to acquire a port. Regardless of our individual
solutions/workarounds, the task is to pull and maintain
so
25 matches
Mail list logo