Re: BitchX in X?

> > I'm using WindowMaker, how would I go about getting bitchx to run in gtk > > mode? > > This question isn't appropriate for -stable. It's probably not > appropriate for freebsd lists in general, but I'm not sure of a bitchx > list to send you to. Yeah, probably better on -questions. Based on

Re: XFree86 faster!?

> I just upgraded from 4.6 Release to -STABLE (Jun 27 21:42:28). > My X feels much snappier now. Any ideas what might cause that? I'm curious about your mouse configuration. Are you using: Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol""auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" I rememb

Re: Build of x11-toolkits/qt23 (qt-2.3.1_1) still broken in 4-STABLE

Please forgive me for this silly question, but do you have any other versions of QT installed? -jj > uname -a FreeBSD inferno.graddiv.ucsb.edu 4.6-RC > FreeBSD 4.6-RC #0: Thu May 16 13:49:28 PDT 2002 > > cvsup from today > > cd /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt23/ fails with: > > c++ -pthread -D_THR

Re: makeworld problem - my first attempt at this

> > [...] > > > #make installworld > > > faild again, same message as before - required smmsp user ismissing. > > > According to UPDATING running mergemaster would take care of this > > > problem. > > > > > > That is where I am stuck. What to do now? > > > > You can add the smmsp user

Re: kernel trap 9 with interrupts disabled

> Almost, but not quite. In your scenario the low-priority task would > get to run since the high-priority task is blocked and would thus > eventually release the resource. No deadlock, no problem. > > The classic priority inversion that I have heard about is the following > scenario: > > Three

Re: very old bug

> > > In fact, MS-DOS provide far superior support for floppies than Linux or > > > FreeBSD or any other Unix I've used. > > > > In what way? > > Perhaps in the way this thread has been discussing for the past 10 or so > posts? Namely the handling of error conditions, when dealing with a floppy >

Re: usb CanonScan 650U

> I noticed the yesterday built 4.5-stable reconized my CanoScan usb > scanner, it shew up as uscanner0 from `dmesg`. But sane-find-scanner > doesn't now the type of my scanner still. I cheched the > /sys/dev/usb/uscanner.c and only found 656U, has anyone get it worked > for 650U? Looking at

Re: KDE mixup: was samba package

> Sure. Why the kde meta-package was left out?? There was an unfortunate accident. The FreeBSD KDE team was attempting to reduce the amount of KDE material on the first CD, and (accidentally) the material didn't make it onto any of the CD's. > And teTeX?? teTeX was a dependency for KDE graphic