alias set for mail(1) in .mailrc
It also seems to me that there was some change (in sendmail bandled
with 3.x and later 4.x) in the way local mail is handled,
but I might be wrong on that.
Igor
Igor Roshchin wrote:
> I am not sure how consistent this is yet, exactly what circumstances
>
Hello!
I wonder if there are any plans or work in progress to
port sendmail 8.11.1 from -current to -stable ?
Both, 3-stable and 4- stable have 8.9.3.1
The sendmail that is present in the -current tree seems to compile
smoothly on 4.x (even on 4.0-RELEASE box), while
breaks on 3.5.1-RELEASE due
Hello!
I just recently upgraded one of the servers from 3.4-RELEASE to 3.5.1-RELEASE.
Shortly, I started seeing this type of messages:
Sep 18 09:09:10 MYHOST /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet
dropped!
What is the reason for these messages?
Should I worry about it, and what can I d
Hello!
Sorry for messing up some people's mailboxes.
When I sent the original message, I just "cut-and-pasted"
messages without shifting "From" in the first position.
(I used regular mail in FreeBSD).
As a result some people's mail agents could've considered
these three included messages as sepa
