Chuck Swiger:
>FreeBSD's COMPAT stuff will let you run binaries
>compiled against an older version of FreeBSD just fine for almost all
>circumstances. However, as soon as you try to install a new port
>which depends on something already installed, or upgrade anything,
>you pretty much real
Marc Fonvieille:
>On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:33:22AM -0400, David Coder wrote:
>> Is there a generic freebsd driver for usb-to-rs-232 adapters? My Thinkpad
>> (running 6.1-RC) doesn't have a standard db-9 port.
>uftdi(4) for some USB/RS232 adapters.
uplcom(4) as well, for example
ucom0: Prolifi
Holger,
>puc0: port 0xa400-0xa41f,0xa000-0xa01f mem
>0xdf80-0xdf800fff,0xdf00-0xdf000fff irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0
>puc1: port 0x9800-0x981f,0x9400-0x941f mem
>0xde80-0xde800fff,0xde00-0xde000fff irq 10 at device 11.1 on pci0
The Titan device shows up as two PCI devices wi
Folks,
I own an LG Electronics LW1100P wireless LAN PCI board, consisting of
a Texas Instruments TI-1211 PCI-CardBus bridge and a wi(4)-compatible
PCCARD.
This card is recognized with an OLDCARD kernel but not with a(n almost)
GENERIC kernel. I've spotted two oddities with this card and made it
w
Remko Lodder:
>Brent Bailey wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> My company has been asked to help with the upgrade of several Freebsd
>> systems that are pretty old. The customer is running a file server samba
>> also running apache running FBSD 4.2, he wants to upgrade using cvsup &
>> the make buildworld proc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I have an old toshiba which also needs PNPBIOS in 4-STABLE and
>> when I tried 5-CURRENT sound just worked. Of course that doesn't say
>> anything about your setup...
>
>PNPBIOS is on by default (and non-optional) in 5.x.
That's gre
nico:
>Je voudrais savoir si je dois installer une version STABLE ou RELEASE.
>Quelle est la différence?
>Pouvez-vous me conseiller entre la freebsd 5.1 ou 4.8 ?
4.x-RELEASE is essentially a snapshot of 4.x-STABLE, with a given x.
4.x-RELEASEs receive security updates only. 4.x-STABLE is t
Oliver Fromme:
>Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:42:57PM +0200, Jaco van Tonder wrote:
> > > I just cvsup'ed to that latest -STABLE and saw that option HTT
> > > is no longer availible in LINT. Does anyone know why this is no
> > > longer supported? I searched
Jamie Bowden:
>The machine that I use for email and a few other things was cvsup'd to the
>latest 4-S this morning now my xterms are all broken. I'm sshing in tothe
>box from an SGI, but I get the same results sshing from a Sun.
ACK. Likely the SGI or the Sun are not using X11R6 but an older xter
Archie Cobbs:
> Guido van Rooij wrote:
> > > An esp0 or ipsec0 device would provide the handle ipfw needs.
> >
> > That is excatly what I wanted to say earlier.
> >
> > But beware: this is only true in tunnel mode.
> >
> > In transport mode, the KAME stack calls the subprotocol handler
> > direc
Yeasah Pell:
>The question is
>simply this: why are there large, complex, non-BSD packages in src-contrib
>that are not critical to the running of many types of systems, and not
>strictly a dependency of the system proper?
Because they always have been. BSD users (those who have been running
BSD
Karsten W. Rohrbach:
>Helge Oldach([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.03.26 23:26:57 +:
>[...]
>> standard, well- and widely-known piece of software around. You may not
>> like it but both S*** and B*** are the de facto standards. Period.
Please quote correctly and don't fals
Christopher Masto:
>On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 10:37:19AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> ok, thanks for the hint.
>> I still think there is a bug in the dependency then, because at
>> least from what i have seen when KLDfying other modules,
>> you make sure that your kernel contains all is needed
>> fo
Alfred Perlstein:
>* Helge Oldach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010313 00:48] wrote:
>> Alfred Perlstein:
>> >If basically running with blind write caching turned on is akin to
>> >running your filesystem in async mode. This is because write
>> >caching gives t
Alfred Perlstein:
>* Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010312 13:46] wrote:
>> How serious is the possible corruption issue, anyway. The loss in
>> performance is pretty drastic although it may be that dd is an
>> especially bad case, but I really don't like to corrupt my disks,
>> either.
>
>If
Jim Weeks:
>On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, David Bushong wrote:
>> I'll try to put a "cleanup" mode in one of these days, but it's rather nasty,
>> since basically you have to:
>>
>> pkg_delete all of the versions (including the most recent), pkg_delete all
>> of the programs that depended on older versions
Sebastien ROCHE:
>My / partition is 32 Mb large. I had no problem until yesterday, when the
>make installkernel didn't work due to insufficient space.
>I think it's /modules which is bigger than it was (and the installation
>process makes a copy of it). Anyway it was difficult to have it work. I
>
David W. Chapman Jr.:
>The problem is netscape itself, since it comes in binary format, anyone who
>ports it doesn't have a choice into which format, I believe the bsdi version
>of netscape is elf, but I'm not totally sure.
It is, and the BSDI binary runs just smoothly on FreeBSD. The only issue
Glendon Gross:
>Is there anyone interested in rewriting that "fake" partition table,
Please look at the thread with the same topic three weeks ago.
I stated that it wouldn't be possible because there is a fundamental
disagreement:
BIOS standard demands that the first *sector* always remains res
Andre DDAdmin:
>I'm running 4.1.1-release, and thinking of moving to 4.2-release or
>stable. the problem occurs whenever I play any sound file. mp3 or wav
>files. if the sound card is in use and I move my mouse, it gives me
>this error.
>pcm0: hwptr went backwards ->
>pcm0: hwptr went b
Hurf Sheldon:
>We've built oa 4.2-STABLE /usr/src (loaded with cvsup) tree by
>running "make buildworld", then a "make installworld" on machine "A"
>(originally a 4.0-RELEASE), then built a new kernel, which worked fine.
>Now we NFS mount the machine "A":/usr/src to machine "B":/usr/src (also
>4
Andreas Klemm:
>On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 10:16:17AM +0100, Helge Oldach wrote:
>> Andreas Klemm:
>> >Address or name of remote host [172.16.2.1]?
>> >Source username [ios]?
>> ^^^
>>
>> >ip rcmd remote-host andreas 172.16.
Chad R. Larson:
>I think earlier in this thread was a reference to a document somewhat
>later than the BIOS code shipped with an AT.
Which probably makes some sense as FreeBSD won't run on a plain IBM AT
box anyway...
>Do we want to start a new thread on what exactly =is= the authoritative
>docu
Dave Tweten:
>My old kernel, vintage 4.1.1, works fine with my three old Adaptec SCSI host
>bus adapters, two AHA1742A's and an AHA2842VL (yes, it's an old motherboard).
>I've cvsupped 4.2 a couple of times (most recently November 9, 14:26 PST),
>built world, built kernel, installed kernel, an
24 matches
Mail list logo
