Re: zfs sharenfs with multiple hosts/networks and options

On 25.08.2010, at 10:03, Marco van Tol wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 09:47:13AM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> with traditional /etc/exports i can do >> >> /export/linux/root -ro xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24 >> /export/linux/root -

zfs sharenfs with multiple hosts/networks and options

besides ignoring sharenfs and using hand edited /etc/exports? Thanks for any help, Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Department of Telecommunications - Phone : +49/421/218-62394 Fax :-3341 __

Re: ZFS performance question

On 20.08.2010, at 14:52, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote: > 20.08.2010 15:12, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: >> r...@antsrv4 [/data/nocompression] # kldstat > > #kldstat -v Id Refs AddressSize Name 19 0x8010 d6aa98 kernel (/boot/kernel/kernel) C

Re: ZFS performance question

On 20.08.2010, at 12:48, Olivier Smedts wrote: > 2010/8/20 Heinrich Rebehn : >> Hi all, >> >> After setting up our new server (Intel Q9550 CPU, 8GB RAM, 4 x ST31000340NS) >> i did a bonnie++ benchmark on the zfs raidz that i created on 4 partitions >> on

ZFS performance question

essed using ahci. I did not attempt any tuning yet. BTW: Running OpenSolaris on the same hardware yields 110306 for per-char-write and 94698 for per-char-read. --Heinrich Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Department of Telecommunications -

Re: ROOT MOUNT ERROR when booting from zfs

On 19.08.2010, at 19:50, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 19/08/2010 20:46 Heinrich Rebehn said the following: >> Now i have another problem: >> >> The root fs on on a 4-disk zfs mirror. I am testing under VMware fusion using >> virtual scsi disks. In order to test redundanc

Re: ROOT MOUNT ERROR when booting from zfs

On 19.08.2010, at 17:24, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:33:11 +0200 > Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> i am getting the error message in $subject when trying to boot from zfs. >> I followed the instructions found in: >>

ROOT MOUNT ERROR when booting from zfs

error message than just ROOT MOUNT ERROR? e.g. zpool not found | zpool could not be imported | illegal mount options | etc The kernel reports that it is trying to mount from zfs:zroot, which is correct. The zfs kernel module is being loaded. -- Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics

Re: iir(4) support under 7.1

On Dec 12, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Rink Springer wrote: Hi Heinrich, On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:27:41AM +0100, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: Hmmm? nobody using this stuff anymore??? FWIW, we have some IBM servers which feature an iir(4) too and they are unusuable on >=7.0 - the iir(4) does

Re: iir(4) support under 7.1

On Dec 10, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: Hi list, i am planning to upgrade our main server from 6.1 to 7.1. The machine has a ICP Vortex GDT8524RZ raid controller which is handled buy the iir(4) driver. Since i have seen various discussions in the past about Adaptec no longer

iir(4) support under 7.1

, data corruption in 64bit configurtions with > 4G RAM and so on, i just wanted to ask what the current state of the driver is. Thanks for your help, Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Department of Telecommunications - Phone : +49/421/

6.2: make buildworld fails at usr.bin/passwd

t german mirrors. Regards, Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Department of Telecommunications - Phone : +49/421/218-4664 Fax :-3341 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://l

Re: Possibility for FreeBSD 4.11 Extended Support

Colin Percival wrote: John Smith wrote: Support for FreeBSD 4.11 is going to end sometime in late January. Originally, FreeBSD 6.2 was supposed to be released back in October. This would have given everyone about 3 months to stress test everything and migrate all their boxes from 4.11 direct to

Re: NFS client slow on amd64 6.2-PRERELEASE #2

Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 05:28:03PM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/tmp] # time dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/x/10MB.dat bs=1M count=10 10485760 bytes transferred in 4.967248 secs (2110980 bytes/sec) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/tmp] # time dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/x

Error upgrading python from ports

ages found (-0 +147) ... done] Please install sysutils/portupgrade. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/usr/ports/lang/python] # pkg_info -Ix portupgrade portupgrade-2.1.3.3_1,2 FreeBSD ports/packages administration and management tool s What

Re: Another whirl with FreeBSD

ore can be turned up by a quick search of the mailing list etc. Overhead ?? Would this mean that the 64 bit version will run slower? -- Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Department of Telecommunications - Phone : +49/421/218-4664 Fax :

Re: NFS client slow on amd64 6.2-PRERELEASE #2

Heinrich Rebehn wrote: Hi list, despite recent improvements with the nfs code, client performance still seems to be a problem. I am getting < 2 MB/sec where i would expect at least 10 MB/sec. My Setup: Machine | ANTSRV1| ANTS

Re: NFS client slow on amd64 6.2-PRERELEASE #2

Heinrich Rebehn wrote: Hi list, despite recent improvements with the nfs code, client performance still seems to be a problem. I am getting < 2 MB/sec where i would expect at least 10 MB/sec. My Setup: Machine | ANTSRV1| ANTS

NFS client slow on amd64 6.2-PRERELEASE #2

ecs (18321787 bytes/sec) real0m5.756s user0m0.000s sys 0m0.704s This yields much better results. Could this be a 64bit-specific problem? Both machines have statd and lockd running. Any ideas where i could tune? -- Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical