Re: ntpd doesn't like ASLR on stable/12 post-r350672

if (atomic_cmpset_rel_32(&rwlock->rw_ >> state, >> (gdb) >> _thr_rtld_lock_release (lock=) at /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/t >> hr_rtld.c:162 >> 162 if ((state & URWLOCK_WRITE_OWNER) == 0) >> (gdb) >> 163

Re: clock running fast

I'd appreciate it if somebody would add this information to: http://ntp.isc.org/Support/KnownOsIssues H ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: clock running fast

No way. ntpd operates in gmt/utc only; localtime is completely out of the question. H -- > Hmmm, are you using the same localtime in all machines? > I remember having the same problem several years ago, in 3.x, with a > server. The clock kept walking. Hardware was OK. It came back to normal > a

Re: clock running fast

> Remove /var/db/ntpd.drift before you reboot or restart your ntpd. Why would you want to do this? And in config files, iburst is your friend. See http://ntp.isc.org/Support/ for more informaion. H ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://li

Re: clock running fast

> But isn't that what the drift file is for, to improve the accuracy of > the local clock during those times when the configured NTP servers aren't > available? Yes. H ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: ntpd v4.2 problem

This would be "use -g with ntpd and forget about ntpdate." H -- > > But make sure your clocks are in sink at the start by using date. > > or add "-g" with the ntpdate_flags, to forcefully adjust time > at the very beginning. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailin

Re: ntpd v4.2 problem

> The problem in the manual is different. You do not have any access > control in your server, your server is worldwide open to other people > changing your runtime configuration etc. (as it seems from your conf file) Wrong - ntpd will never allow changes to itself without explicitly allowing it

Re: make world?

Thanks! I have been using :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/automake to get automake. What, if any, is the difference between this repository and the one at ??? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the bod

Re: Flag for NTP slew only?

It might be better to use "ntp -g" at startup, and make sure you run the "ntp-wait" script before bumping the securelevel. It would probably be a mistake to force slewalways. I believe ntpdate will not be around for much longer (maybe a year, probably less). H To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E

Re: -stable of 99.12.2 hoistile to ntpd?

The latest release of ntpd will try the POSIX sched stuff, and if those do not work, fall back to rtprio(), and if that does not work, nice() (more or less - I'm not looking at the code). H To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the messa

Re: NTP daemon and Y2K issues

H> Also, a *huge* number of bugfixes and improvements have been made to the H> NTP code since xntp3.4anything. 1> I plan to upgrade CURRENT up to 4.0.97 soon. I don't run STABLE at all 1> and we're too close to 3.3 to change anything in it. Maybe for 3.4. 2> Will 3.4 come out before Jan 1 ? A