On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:28:12PM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote:
> >
> > There was one question I forgot to ask:
> > Could I have known that my method of updating the ESP was not correct?
> > If so, where is this documented?
> >
>
> It is probably unlikely, to be honest. I don't know that we do a good
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 08:29:03PM +0200, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 08:24:54AM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:12 AM Guido van Rooij wrote:
> > >
> > > I did a zpool upgrade -a to enable large_dnode and spacemap_v2.
> >
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 08:24:54AM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:12 AM Guido van Rooij wrote:
> >
> > I did a zpool upgrade -a to enable large_dnode and spacemap_v2.
> > After that, I did:
> > gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 2
ris: NOTICE: Cannot find the pool label for 'zroot'
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Regards,
Guido van Rooij
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, sen
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 03:58:03AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 11:13:49AM +0200, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 08:42:38PM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:46:05PM +0200, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> &
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 09:15:32AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:46:05PM +0200, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> >I've got a amd64 system where I;m using powernow. I am using th i8254
> >timecounter.
>
> I'm using ACPI-fast on amd64 without
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 08:42:38PM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:46:05PM +0200, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> > I've got a amd64 system where I;m using powernow. I am using th i8254
> > timecounter. I keep getting time resets from ntp:
>
> I don&#
I've got a amd64 system where I;m using powernow. I am using th i8254
timecounter. I keep getting time resets from ntp:
Apr 4 01:13:27 gvr ntpd[96120]: kernel time sync enabled 6001
Apr 4 01:30:21 gvr ntpd[96120]: kernel time sync enabled 2001
Apr 4 03:28:25 gvr ntpd[96120]: time reset -10.5876
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:50:04PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Guido van Rooij wrote:
> > Anyway, I created a gm device and a partition. Now the read performance
> > is not what I'd expect.
> > I have the partition on two SATA devices on different controlers.
> &
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> You don't need to.
>
> If your bsdlabel partition is N sectors in size, the gmirror
> object will have size N - 1. Newfs will not be able to write
> to that last sector. You newfs the finished mirror device,
> not the individual
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:34:25AM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
> Guido van Rooij wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:07:14AM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
> >
> >>Guido van Rooij wrote:
> >>
> >>>Is it possible to use gmirror to mirror a single BSD part
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:18:01PM +0200, Rink Springer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:07:59PM +0200, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> > Is it possible to use gmirror to mirror a single BSD partition?
> > If not: is it possible with other tools?
>
> I think this is possible, hav
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:07:14AM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
> Guido van Rooij wrote:
> >Is it possible to use gmirror to mirror a single BSD partition?
> >If not: is it possible with other tools?
>
> Yes it is possible, I found this site had very good examples of settin
Is it possible to use gmirror to mirror a single BSD partition?
If not: is it possible with other tools?
-Guido
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 01:57:20PM +0900, Hideyuki KURASHINA wrote:
> Darren, could you please commit following patch? Guido, also please
> merge those changes?
As Darren seems to be afk untill the 10th, I took the liberty
to commit the changes.
-Guido
___
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:56:25AM -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Guido van Rooij wrote:
> > > The problem is that while ESP packets arrive to be processed by
> > > IPsec just fine thru my ipfw rules, when the packets are de-encrypted
> > > and re-inserted into the ke
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:08:54PM -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Guido,
>
> I am using a tunneling device (gif0).
>
> How are we supposed to fix the issue with your patch installed? If we need
> to add more rules, that's fine but what would these rules be? Are they
> before the divert? After
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:24:56PM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Guido wrote:
>
> > > The problem is that while ESP packets arrive to be processed by
> > > IPsec just fine thru my ipfw rules, when the packets are de-encrypted
> > > and re-inserted into the kernel they appear to i
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:11:29AM -0600, David Kelly wrote:
>
> Once the ipsec history is removed from the packet then how/what/where is
> the packet tagged as having come from? In my case it appears to have
It is tagged as any other packet.
> retained properties of the ESP packet it was encase
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 10:43:57PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
> Unfortunately, no. IPFW is stateless (at least from packet
> to packet). This makes it compact and fast but unable to
> detect or handle some situations by itself.
>
> You could write a daemon that hung off of a divert(4)
> socket
20 matches
Mail list logo
