-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:15:47 +0100, Yann Golanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having an issue with Xorg under FreeBSD 5.3: The screen has lots
> of small wave-like patterns descending along the screen whenever the CPU
> does any work. My monito
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:37:01 +1000, Warren
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> err .. all i did was what i usually do to upgrade a pkg and run cvsup and
> then portupgrade .. has always worked in the past, wasnt aware of needing
> something special in this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:07:41 -0500, Scott Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> However, it seems to have been fixed as of Sunday or so. (I've
> forgotten the exact date now).
It was fixed by the time I did my last cvsup, and that was Thursday March
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:58:08 -0500, Vlad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to be fair, I should note that as admin / user of few tens of servers
> running both systems, I can assure you that if your linux "loses
> control" with LA ~ 10, then something is se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:58:02 +, Jake Stride
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] make
> Linking rastertokmlf...
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcups
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /root/magicolor2430DL-1.1.0.
Make distclean.
Now, before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:28:58 +0300, "Penerdzhy R.V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ð ÐÐ ÑÐÐÐÑ ÐÑÑÐÑÐÑ ÑÐÐÐ
> ÐÐÑÑÐÐ.
> ÐÐÑÐÑÐÐÑÑÑ ÐÐÑ, ÑÑÐ ÐÐÑÐ ÑÐÐÐÑÐÐÐÑ
> ÐÑÐÐ Ð ÐÑÐÑÑ ÑÐÑÑÐÐÑÑÐÐÐ,
> ÑÐ Ð ÐÐÑÑÑ ÐÑÐÑÐÐÑ.
>
> ÐÑÐÑÑ ÐÐÑ ÐÐÑÐÐÑ,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:21:07 -0800, "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please DON'T top post to any FreeBSD list!
Who was top-posting? I certainly wasn't! I hate that moronic practice with
a vengeance.
Only mildly less annoying is people w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:32:02 -0500 (EST), Jeff Roberson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the process that does the FFT in kernel, niced, or rtprio'd?
last pid: 93131; load averages: 0.96, 0.49, 0.24 up 0+05:18:20 15:29:47
48 processes: 2 running,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:21:39 -0800, "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd say something is very wrong on your systems and I'd ALMOST bet it's
> ata related. Maybe ATA-MkIII would help things out.
Possibly, altho' I doubt it given that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:13:32 +0100 (MET), Mipam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the planning i saw that the RELENG_5 source would be frozen feb 2.
> Will this still happen or not?
That was a month ago...
- --
G. Stewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:24:25 -0500, "Matt Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I just installed 5.3-R on a spare machine, which is equipped with a D-Link
> DFE-530TX network card.
> This is a "typical" Digital 21440A-based card which has worked fine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:02:28 -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > $ uname -v
> > FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Feb 27 10:36:40 CET 2005 {snip}
> > $ nice -n 5 date
> > Sun 27 Feb 2005 23:59:37 CET
>
> Yes, but you weren't u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:54:55 +0200, Lefteris Tsintjelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Is nice broken?
>
> FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Feb 26 14:17:21 EET 2005
>
> # nice -n 5 date
> nice: Badly formed number.
$ uname -v
FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:49:00 +0100, Michael Nottebrock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks vt-
> switching for me.
Well, I decided to bite the bullet and upgraded to Xorg 6.8.1 anyway. It
did
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:49:00 +0100, Michael Nottebrock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> edit /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf, find the HOLD_PKGS = [ line and change
> it to
>
> HOLD_PKGS = [
> 'bsdpan-*',
> 'xorg-*',
> 'imake-*',
> ]
That's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:25:24 +1030, "Daniel O'Connor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't need to update a port just because it depends on Xorg. The X
> API is quite stable so you can update just Xorg without expecting any
> problems. (I did XFree8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 02:35:33 -0800, Sam Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I don't know anything about servepath.com
I'm a regular in some of the anti-spam newsgroups and servepath don't
exactly have a stellar reputation. They just signed up Eddy M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What is the current status of Xorg 6.8.1?
ISTR not that long ago - when ports were updated from 6.7.0 - people were
reporting random freezes and crashes with the new version of Xorg. This
seems to have died down now so I might consider the update, whi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:22:12 -0600, Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
with a forced Reply-to: directing mail away from the list:
> The problem is that he only has the "c" partition, which is reserved to
> specifying the entire disk.
s/disk/slice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:58:37 +0100, Charles Erik McDonald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bastion(root):#mount -t ufs /dev/ad3s1 /mnt/wd2500pb/
> mount: /dev/ad3s1 on /mnt/wd2500pb: incorrect super block
> bastion(root):#mount -t ufs /dev/ad3s1c /mnt/wd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:45:40 -0600, Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have two large disks:
> >
> > /dev/ad2 144G124G9.2G93%/mnt/sp1604n
> > /dev/ad3 226G202G5.2G98%/mnt/wd2500pb
>
> Did you use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 23:10:54 +0100, Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm so stupid, this really is the case.
Wait until someone else confirms before claiming that *you* are the stupid
one :)
- --
G. Stewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anarchy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:18:27 +0100, Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm using a single board computer with freebsd 4-SATBLE. Attached to
> this thingy is a usb memory drive (not plugged, present at boot up)
> which takes approx. 15 seconds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:03:33 +0100, Ivan Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just note that it could not be /dev/da but /dev/ad, e.g, da is
> only for SCSI disks and ad is for IDE ones.
Only for *internal* IDE drives.
USB drives use umass whi
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:21:32 -0800, Freddie Cash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On February 9, 2005 04:13 pm, Ivan Roth wrote:
> > sorry to ask that but which software could I use to produce vectorial
> > graphics? Quite newbie to freebsd, don't know such free software.
>
> Inkscape is supposed to b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:37:59 -0200, "STAMPA 2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What or where can I configure PHP5 to read Mysql through Apache2?
PHP doesn't need ODBC to talk to a MySQL server. Just use the MySQL
functions included in PHP:
http://br.ph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:08:16 -0500 (EST), Vladimir Pianykh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had some problems with "rl" cards with "auto" media.
You're probably not the only one.
Note this comment from sys/pci/if_rl.c
/*
* The RealTek 8139 PCI NIC r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:08:12 -0800 (PST), jag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anyone running this combination successfully.
> It has given me different errors a different times and
> presently it gives (EE) R128: DFP no detected.
It always does.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 03:55:42 -0800, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have an uptodate port system you will find
>
> Port: bison-1.875_4
> Path: /usr/ports/devel/bison1875
Indeed.
That'll teach me to hit [tab] twice after typing /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ports cvsup'ed yesterday,
$ cat /usr/ports/devel/bison/Makefile
{snip}
PORTNAME= bison
PORTVERSION=1.75
PORTREVISION= 2
{snip}
Is there any particular reason why ports are sticking with this version when
1.875 was released 2 years ago alm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:26:27 +, Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> That won't happen, since /usr isn't mounted in single user mode.
Even if it were, there are always "Live BSD" CDROMs which should allow you
to boot and then fsck your disk pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:19:33 -0500 (EST), "Mike Jakubik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have whatever the default values are for 5.3. Do these need to be set
> manally?
Yes, they do.
> Any reason for this?
ACPI and APM are mutually exclusive. If one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:14:27 -0500 (EST), "Mike Jakubik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Starting usbd.
> /etc/rc: WARNING: /dev/apmctl not found; kernel is missing apm(4)
> Starting apmd.
>
> --
>
> My kernel:
> --
> # Power management support (see NOT
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 11:14:04 -0800, John-Mark Gurney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though you'll probably want to d/l the ProDVD version of cdrecord to
> be able to burn DVD's..
Either that or use dvd+rw-tools (see /usr/ports/sysutils/dvd+rw-tools).
--
G. Stewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you plan
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 04:26:20 -0800, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Peter, you can count me in for $50. Will send it here in the next
> couple of hours or so. On a humorous note, I keep getting these emails
> from *supposedly* EBay and Paypal telling me that my account is about
> to be
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 20:23:22 +, Stacey Roberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Faulty RAM, maybe?
A machine throwing a segfault is fairly characteristic of a CPU overheating
and/or of a faulty RAM stick.
--
G. Stewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which is wo
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 12:37:35 +0100, Godwin Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> And yet:
> $ glxinfo | grep direct
> direct rendering: No
> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
>
> G.
Installing $PORTS/graphics/dri certainly helped...
/me wipes egg o
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 23:20:46 +1030, "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What does..
> pkgdb /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so
>
> say?
$ pkg_info -W /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so
/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so was installed by package xorg-libraries-6.7.0_3
Could it be that this is just a stub? I ask becaus
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 23:03:15 +1030, "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Sure you don't have nvidia GL, or bog standard MESA libraries installed
> for some crazy reason?
> (Wild stab in the dark..)
Not that wild...
I only installed what is included with the ports version of xorg, which
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 11:10:15 +0100, Godwin Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You're probably on to something there. I *do* get the "Direct rendering
> enabled" message on the Linux setup, although the logs also say that
> there's a problem with AGP and that i
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 01:00:18 +0100, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (II) R128(0): [drm] dma control initialized, using IRQ 11
>
> Right after this line I get (for my radeon):
>
> (II) RADEON(0): [drm] Initialized kernel GART heap manager, 5111808
>
> Followed by:
>
> (II) RADEON(0):
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 00:01:29 +0100, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tried kldloading radeon anyway and running glxgears. It can't do any
> > better than about 10 fps at 1024x768/24bits.
>
> My radeon gives 560 - 580 fps with direct rendering. An R128 would
> probably be somewhat slow
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 22:45:32 +0100, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For 3D you have to load the agp and radeon modules.
This is a Rage128, not a Radeon.
agp is built into the kernel and r128 is already kldloaded.
I tried kldloading radeon anyway and running glxgears. It can't do any
be
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 13:26:20 -0500, Jason Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> IMHO, if you just want 2D, pretty much any bottom of the barrel card
> will work.
I'd add that Matrox cards are excellent in the 2D arena. I still have an old
G200 here and It beats the socks off the ATI Rage128 I al
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:31:09 +0100, Godwin Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> but sometimes it gets thrown into limbo and the only way to resume
> operation is to perform a hard reset
Sorry for the self-fup but a thought occurred to me.
Stein, have you tried "camcontrol rese
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:17:49 +0100, Stein Morten Sandbech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> My only problem are when an operation on the unit fails, the
> /dev/cd0 device disappears, and a mknod to recreate the device
> doesn't work either.
>
> The most recent causes have been using cdda2wav.
>
> As
46 matches
Mail list logo
