wide exposure for the
> first time. Many of these features (such as SMPng) have broad impacts
> on the kernel."
>
> Looks like it will not be branched from current for at least 3 to 6
> months.
So if one decides to make the jump to 5.0 and wants to track
development, shoul
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:00:52AM +0100, Martin Kaeske wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 04:58:23PM -0600, Glenn Johnson wrote:
>
> > > I started rwhod and I have the rmonitor port installed. I ran
> > > tcpdump and can see the broadcasts but the system is not
BSD STABLE or something I somehow have wrong on some of my
machines? I am seeing this behavior on 2 machines that I recently
brought up to date via cvsup/builworld/installworld.
--
Glenn Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 06:14:32PM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Hello. Today I applied the offered patch for the broken FLEXlm
> facility under the Linuxulator. I applied this patch to all of our
> systems running FBSD 4.4-STABLE. I recompiled only kernel and loadable
> modules and rebooted all
m.
>
> Hope this bug gets fixed soon ;-))
Marcel posted a patch to the emulation list. I tested it and it solved
the problem for me. I am attaching the message he sent. Also, he said
the patch should be comitted by the end of the week to -STABLE.
--
Glenn Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Beg
nd it ran for about a
month and then died. This was an Asus motherboard and Asus has a very
good reputation. At this point I was even suspecting my UPS as the
culprit. I ordered a different brand of motherboard (Tyan) and the
system has been working for about a year now with zero downtime.
The take hom
