Re[2]: BRAVO 4.4 TEAM!

2001-09-21 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello j, Friday, September 21, 2001, 12:09:09 AM, you wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:29:49PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > | BRAVO to the 4.4 Team > | > | My update from 4.3 to 4.4 (custom kernel too) when absolutely > | flawlessly!!! > Bina

Re[2]: KERNCONF instead of KERNEL?

2001-03-02 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Bob, Friday, March 02, 2001, 7:52:33 PM, you wrote: > You can't reboot to single user mode when you are doing a remote > update. He is specifically asking about the best way to do > a remote update. You have to do everything multiuser and accept > the

4.2 STABLE kernel broken?

2001-02-11 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello, I built new world and kernels today. Trying to boot them, I always run into the following: Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of Calif

IPFilter 3.4.11 into stable?

2000-10-16 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hello, I like ipfilter pretty much and after the recent release of 3.4.11 I'm wondering if there are any plans to merge it into 4-STABLE (where's still 3.4.8 which has got some issues with the FTP proxy)? Best regards, Gabriel To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubsc

Re[2]: Freebsd vs. UPS

2000-09-25 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hello Alfred, Monday, September 25, 2000, 8:45:31 PM, you wrote: > Check ports, there should be some stuff to talk to APC power supplies. There are some ports: bkpupsd upsd upsmon > you could probably jury rig it so that several servers talking over > the network could be informed from the ma

Freebsd vs. UPS

2000-09-25 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
I need to get some protection for our servers and I need to know if FreeBSD supports the almighty APC UPS (shutting the servers down in the worst case and rebooting them when power is back, is enough...) with some port. I also wonder if anyone can comment on quality APC delivers and if I need to

Re[4]: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE is about as stable as windows98

2000-08-21 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hello Luke, Monday, August 21, 2000, 5:59:54 PM, you wrote: > I am using: > FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 7 19:35:50 > atapci0: port 0xb800-0xb80f at device 4.1 on > pci0 > ad0: 19574MB [39770/16/63] at ata0-master using UDMA66 > with an 80 pin cable > I have never had any problems or errors

Re[2]: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE is about as stable as windows98

2000-08-21 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
> I missed the start of this, but if this is VIA and UDMA66 with ICRC > errors and generally unstable fs's, count me in too. I just used sysctl > to put the drive into PIO mode to get around it for now. Not sure at what mode mines are running (most likely UDMA 33 as I can't use normal 80pin UDMA

Re[2]: top problem with 4.1-STABLE

2000-08-11 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hello Sean, Friday, August 11, 2000, 8:33:17 PM, you wrote: > The "nlist failed" error usually implies that you didn't use > /boot/loader to boot the machine or your boot blocks are out > of whack with the system. That's correct. After the last reboot (which I did in order to get the newly attac

Re[2]: Network load balancing hardware ...

2000-08-10 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hello Daniel, Thursday, August 10, 2000, 5:45:39 AM, you wrote: > Eddie can run with multiple Front End servers. The White Paper covers all > of this. Sure. But it unfortunately doesn't cover how the actual failover of a frontend server is implemented and that's the most critical point there