Re: Call for FreeBSD 2013Q3 (July-September) Status Reports

2013-10-06 Thread Gabor Pali
Dear FreeBSD Community, This is another gentle reminder that the deadline for submissions for the third Quarterly Status Report is tomorrow! Please find the details quoted below. On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Gabor Pali wrote: > Dear FreeBSD Community, > > Please note that

Re: Call for FreeBSD 2013Q3 (July-September) Status Reports

2013-09-29 Thread Gabor Pali
Dear FreeBSD Community, Please note that the next submission date for the July to September Quarterly Status Reports is October 7th, 2013, bit more than a week away. Please consult my previous message for the details: On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Gabor Pali wrote: > They do not have to

Final Reminder: FreeBSD Quarterly Status Reports, July--December, 2012

2013-02-15 Thread Gabor Pali
Hello there, Just a final reminder: the deadline for the reports is this Sunday. On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Gabor Pali wrote: > Let me call your attention to the approaching deadline of the next > set(s) of FreeBSD Quarterly Status Reports. Please consider > submitting a few

Reminder: FreeBSD Quarterly Status Reports, July--December, 2012

2013-02-10 Thread Gabor Pali
Hello there, Let me call your attention to the approaching deadline of the next set(s) of FreeBSD Quarterly Status Reports. Please consider submitting a few lines on your FreeBSD-related project, we are counting on all of you! :-) On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Gabor Pali wrote: >Ple

FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report April-June, 2012

2013-01-13 Thread Gabor Pali
FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report April-June, 2012 Introduction This report covers FreeBSD-related projects between April and June 2012. This quarter was highlighted by having a new Core Team elected, which took office on July 11th to start its work with a relatively high number of new

GEOM_RAID in GENERIC 9.1

2012-08-17 Thread Gabor Radnai
engineers. > >Eugene. My reply again then: Unfortunately I am a less experienced user so no clue how to disable GEOM_RAID but i am hit by this issue. My zfs setup is totally messed up. Would appreciate if you could share the trick. Additionally: building a new kernel solves the issue natural

GEOM_RAID in GENERIC 9.1

2012-08-16 Thread Gabor Radnai
Hi, Unfortunately I am a less experienced user so no clue how to disable GEOM_RAID but i am hit by this issue. My zfs setup is totally messed up. Would appreciate if you could share the trick. Thanks in advance. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing li

bsdinstall partitioning

2011-10-09 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
r the hard work! Cheers, Gabor ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

2010-04-22 Thread Gabor PALI
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Chip Camden wrote: > lang/ghc is still marked IGNORE, unless I'm missing something. Yes, if your system is older than 6.0 on i386 and older then 7.0 on amd64, it is still ignored, since we do not support those platforms. Otherwise it must be okay. Cheers, g. ___

Re: Strange Swapping Issues(?)

2010-04-15 Thread Gabor PALI
Hello, On 04/15/10 20:41, Peter Jeremy wrote: > The out-of-swap hander will kill the largest process so one of your > problems is probably "throwto003". I can't offer any suggestion as > to why the swap_pager_getswapspace() errors continued afterwards. Okay, it was my fault. After huge processe

Re: Strange Swapping Issues(?)

2010-04-14 Thread Gabor PALI
Hi Jeremy, On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > The swapinfo command you ran was not run at 05:26 in the morning. It was run a few minutes after. I accidentally got it live :) Well, I was expecting that because I have seen similar message previously in the logs. I think i

Strange Swapping Issues(?)

2010-04-13 Thread Gabor PALI
Hello there, I am running a FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE with GENERIC kernel as of February 17 on my box (quad core, 2 GB RAM), and recently I spot some interesting problems in my logs. My machine runs two instances of a client in two separate chroot environments in parallel with 32-bit and 64-bit user

ZFS: drive replacement performance

2009-08-03 Thread Gabor Radnai
ears label. 3. if I make disk offline, glabel succeed, but "zpool replace " fails with "/dev/label/ is part of active pool " 4. export , glabel, import neither works. A detailed guide in "for dummies" style would be appreciated. Thanks, Gabor ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: IA64 7.2-RC2 in HP Integrity Virtual Machine

2009-04-29 Thread Zahemszky Gabor
Yes, of course, I've tried the IA-64 version. Here is the whole verbose boot output. Gabor < Gabor at Zahemszky dot HU > Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]... Entering /boot/kernel/kernel at 0xe4078000... PAL Proc at 0xe000fff04000 SAL Proc at 0xe000fff0

IA64 7.2-RC2 in HP Integrity Virtual Machine

2009-04-29 Thread Zahemszky Gabor
n IVM virtual machine? And if it is, how? Thanks Gabor (*) HP IVM is a software virtualization, (like VmWare Workstation) running on Itanium based HP-UX machines, creating virtual Itanium machines (I can run IA64-Windows / IA64-Linux, and of course IA64-HP-UX operating systems in the V

Re: FreeBSD 4 EOL ports tree

2007-04-18 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
ts or only some (not shown in the webcvs)? Thanks, Marc Hello Marc, RELEASE_4_EOL is the tag where the 4.X support was not yet removed. We only started to remove the 4.X support after the tag, thus you should still be able to build ports from the tag on 4.X.

Re: VIA 6420 SATA150 RAID on 5.4

2005-08-26 Thread Gabor Esperon
On Aug 25, 2005, at 12:04 PM, Roland Smith wrote: On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:39:08AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: Does anyone have one of these -> atapci1: port 0xc400-0xc4ff, 0xc000-0xc00f, 0xbc00-0xbc03,0xb800-0xb807,0xb400-0xb403,0xb000-0xb007 irq 20 at device 15.0 on pci0 ata4: cha

FAST_IPSEC doesn't seem to honor net.key.prefered_oldsa=0

2003-09-11 Thread Gabor
When using the FAST_IPSEC option in the kernel build, the sysctl variable net.key.prefered_oldsa seems to make no difference. The kernel always chooses an old SA. This problem can be easily reproduced. Just wait till the soft limit of the SA is expired and do a setkey -F on the remote and then pi

Re: perl fails in buildworld

2000-10-23 Thread Gabor Kincses
Kent Stewart wrote: > > Gabor Kincses wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm repeatedly getting the following error while trying to build > > 4.1.1-STABLE as of last night and this morning: > > > > /usr2/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/libperl/../../