Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed

2007-03-08 Thread Fluffles
Ivan Voras wrote: > Fluffles wrote: > > >> The bonnie Per Char-benchmark is often bottlenecked by the CPU since it >> requires either a lot of cpu power or a lot of memory activity; both >> which puts demands on the cpu. If i see only 0.5MB in the Per >> Char-

Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed

2007-03-08 Thread Fluffles
Eric Anderson wrote: > On 03/07/07 23:13, Fluffles wrote: >> >> On what hardware is this? Using any form of geom software RAID? >> >> The low Per Char results would lead me to believe it's a very slow CPU; >> maybe VIA C3 or some old pentium? Modern syst

Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed

2007-03-07 Thread Fluffles
Ivan Voras wrote: > Fluffles wrote: > > >> If you use dd on the raw device (meaning no UFS/VFS) there is no >> read-ahead. This means that the following DD-command will give lower STR >> read than the second: >> >> no read-ahead: >> dd if=/dev/mirr

Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed

2007-03-07 Thread Fluffles
Artem Kuchin wrote: > > - Original Message - From: "Fluffles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> If you use dd on the raw device (meaning no UFS/VFS) there is no >> read-ahead. This means that the following DD-command will give lower STR >> read than the se

Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed

2007-03-07 Thread Fluffles
Artem Kuchin wrote: >>> Artem Kuchin wrote: >>> Hmm. what kind of HDD, RAID or whatever are you using? >>> My raid pretty much sucks. It is build it on the intel motherboard >>> LSI Megaraid. But i still get 81Mb/sec when doing >>> dd if=/dev/ar0 of=/dev/null bs=1M >>> >>> How much do you get on th