Hi.
Please change in pkg base default option on FreeBSD-12.1 to
VIMAGE enabled
because each time I do `pkg upgrade` it tries to reinstall ng_ipacct with
VIMAGE DISabled.
Installed packages to be REINSTALLED:
ng_ipacct-20180401 (options changed)
After that I must do
pkg deinstall
Great Thanks.
сб, 7 дек. 2019 г. в 03:28, Eugene Grosbein :
> 07.12.2019 7:22, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> Adding port maintainer to CC:
>
> >> Yes. It works. Thank you very much.
> >>
> >> I delete manual copied file.
> >> I install ports via portsnap.
> >> I fetch srcs from ftp.
> >> And install
o years it works on
version 11.1 very well.
But after upgrade from 11.3 to 12.1 "pkg install ng_ipacct" got broken.
Is it really can be? Or it's my mistake?
Thanks again.
пт, 6 дек. 2019 г. в 22:37, Eugene Grosbein :
> 07.12.2019 0:49, Eugene Kazarinov wrote:
>
&g
Hi.
pkg install ng_ipacct install ng_ipacct.ko in /boot/modules/ and it
doesnt start
if I copy ng_ipacct.ko to /boot/kernel/ it didnt start with error:
link_elf_obj: symbol tcbinfo undefined
linker_load_file: /boot/kernel/ng_ipacct.ko - unsupported file type
How to run ng_ipacct on FreeBSD 12.1?
s or pf.conf)
By now I see that ipnat.rules is mapping forwarded packets on 10.3-STABLE
and doesnt map they on version FreeBSD-11 stable r318266.
So. Something in ipnat mechanism is broken in FreeBSD-11 stable r318266.
2017-05-15 23:28 GMT+03:00 Eugene Kazarinov :
> Hello.
> After upgrade from 1
Hello.
After upgrade from 10.3 stable something broke.
I have tun0
tun0: flags=8151 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=8
inet 10.10.0.6 --> 10.10.0.5 netmask 0x
groups: tun
Opened by PID
in pf.conf I have rule
nat on tun0 inet from 192.168.10.0/24 to any -
Hello everybody.
(sorry for my english)
>
> # For individuals wanting to upgrade their sources (even if only a
> # delta of a few days):
> #
> # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source
> tree).
> # 2. `make buildworld'
> # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL
>
> So, one gets run on the module you want to load & fails (and prints the
> message you see). The next one is run and it understands that file type
> so loads it.
>
I understand now.
Thank you a lot again.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
h
>
> > # $FreeBSD: ports/net-mgmt/ng_ipacct/Makefile,v 1.9 2008/06/02
> > NO_PACKAGE= "Depends on kernel"
> >
> > # $FreeBSD: ports/net-mgmt/ng_ipacct/Makefile,v 1.10 2008/08/05
> > IGNORE= "Depends on kernel"
> >
> >
> >
> > Should I change IGNORE to NO_PACKAGE and it should works fine
Ok
Let's see
There is
/usr/ports/net-mgmt/ng_ipacct/Makefile
"old" version is
# $FreeBSD: ports/net-mgmt/ng_ipacct/Makefile,v 1.9 2008/06/02 16:27:40 skv
Exp $
and containts these lines
.ifndef PACKAGE_BUILDING
NO_PACKAGE= "Depends on kernel"
.endif
last version is
# $FreeBSD: ports/net-m
By the way.
I use this kernel config since 5.4-stable, then was 6.0, after that 6.2 and
on one server is 6.3-PRERELEASE now. It works.
My kernel config is
> ===
> include GENERIC
>
> options IPFIREWALL
> options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD
> options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE
>
Hello again.
Situation 1
I have installed 6.3-STABLE-200807-amd64-disc1.iso
#cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/ng_ipacct/
#make install clean
it's ok. It has installed. (sorry for my english)
next Situation 2
I have installed 6.3-STABLE-200807-amd64-disc1.iso
csup it to last src tree.
csup it to last por
nice.
After posting I think to get a look to manual if it has changed since
last time then I look into
and tatata... ;) "*Note:* The implementation of *CVSup* protocol included
with the FreeBSD system is called *csup*. It first appeared in FreeBSD 6.2."
2008/8/7 Eugene Kazarin
Hello.
Dont know is this list right for this topic, but dont know witch one is.
So
I got 6.3-STABLE-200807-amd64-disc1.iso
I have installed it
cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui/
make install
make clean
#cvsup some-stable-sup-file
Connected to cvsup.xx.ru
Bus error (core dumped)
I cant get
IMHO very "nice" offset.
It worked on ali chip, about wich I ask in message with topic: "cant start
18, 21-24 hdd drives on 6.2-PRERELEASE/amd64. pls pls hel"
I mean sata drive that freebsd fand on ali controller - ad26 (seagate 320 gb
7200.10 sata II)
fsck doesnt fix it. It hangs on
[EMAIL PR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq1: atkbd0 381 0
irq14: ata0 135495 28
irq15: ata1 166738 34
irq16: atapci3 36963 7
irq17:
I have nForce3 motherboard and Athlon 64
Here is /var/log/messages
Sep 28 03:41:03 ddf syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
Sep 28 03:41:03 ddf kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Sep 28 03:41:03 ddf kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988,
1989, 1991, 1992
Now I use map 10.0.0.0/8 -> 212.118.z.w/32 and it works fine.
ipnat -s now shows "inuse 55633", maximus that i saw was about 8
How to resolve this problem?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Since 6.1 I have stopped using polling as a regular kernel seems to give
good performance as compared to polling mode.
In fact I used to get anything between 55-75megs/sec on 6.1 with regular
cables but since upgraded to cat6 quality Ethernet cable I get
practically full gigabit speed with no pol
FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #10: Sat Sep 16 04:13:37 MSD 2006
16-09-2006 16:50:01, ERROR: StepTime does not match Avc 900. Please
Report this.
16-09-2006 16:50:01, ERROR: StepTime does not match Avc -600. Please
Report this.
16-09-2006 16:50:01, ERROR: StepTime does not match Avc-210
Something with em0 is really wrong. I dont get timeouts, but
Before cvsup I had 6.0-PRERELEASE and didn't have a problem.
Now I have "FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #8: Fri Sep 15 03:44:49 MSD 2006" and the
problem is so:
(On machine I have LARGE_NAT, em0, em1, em2)
on fresh system ping to www.ru fro
21 matches
Mail list logo
