Is 6.0 the new stable or is it 5.4??

newbie wants to know :) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Is 6.0 the new stable or is it 5.4??

newbie wants to know. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

thx all for your responses

though after looking at 6.0 beta I couldn't help but think why not just call it 5.5? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

any ideas when 5.5 will be out

I haven't noticed any word on this release, just 6.0 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

X for users slow: you are right! thx

Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Monday 01 August 2005 17:34, Eriq wrote: after all of this, I notice that it takes a user about a minute after 'startx' to get into X. Yes I know, but I still like the colors :) anyway this doesn't happen when I logon as root and start X. Blackbox

x for users slow

Hi all, first I would like to say thx to the FreeBSD devel team they have truly done a great job with 5.4! Now I have all my servers running ie. dns (what a headache that was), apache (ok after I got dns working), postgres (the easiest of the bunch), postfix (smooth as always). Most if not all

4.11 vs. 5.4 stablity

I am running 4.11 on a dual amd box and have found it solid as a rock for running apache2, postgres, dns and postfix. But now I am thinking of upgrading. I wonder if 5.4 is as stable for these servers that must run 24/7. And is it worth all the trouble to do, I have grown pretty lazy :) __

need help linking??

can be made into a port some day. Here is my message and response from him I am including the Makefile as an attachment: Hi Eriq, It refuses to link? Ask BSD users and let me know what the solution is. --- Make sure to add the appropriate include files but I don't think it would hav

Re: 5.3 STABLE for production server?

I have been running apache, postfix, postgresql on a 5.3 mashine and the only problems i have faced was with sshd and time outs and even then most of the problem was with my named.conf. 5.3 seems to be doing great! much better than the ones before it, and i am on a dual amd system. The only down ti

not putty but mostly a dns and windows virus problem

yep, I did also have an old version of putty, but I think the main problem was the dns conf and network problems, there is one windows box acting as a server on the same network that got a few viruses and started taking up all the bandwidth I found this yesterday and have tightened up security by i

thx to all that helped w/ putty or sshd problem

most of the problem was w/ my dns conf. but the other suggestions opened my eyes to alot thx. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.1 - Release Date: 12/13/2004 ___ [EMAIL PROT