On 07-05-05 02:22, "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yOn Sat, 7 May 2005, Eirik [ISO-8859-1] Øverby wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just started playing with mounting ports into jails using unionfs
>> (mount_unionfs -b /usr/ports_jail /usr/local/jails/jail-0/usr/ports), and
>> many thin
On 07-05-05 03:19, "George Hartzell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eirik Øverby writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just started playing with mounting ports into jails using unionfs
>> (mount_unionfs -b /usr/ports_jail /usr/local/jails/jail-0/usr/ports), and
>> many things seem to work fine.
>> However, when t
On 05-05-05 16:59, "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2005, Eirik [ISO-8859-1] Øverby wrote:
>
>> The solution, or at least parts of it, would be to have certain parts of
>> the jail filesystems mounted in via nullfs (acceptable solution) or
>> unionfs (ideal solution).
On 06-05-05 08:18, "Danny Braniss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Eirik Øverby writes:
>>> [...]
>>> What can I expect to see when trying nullfs and/or unionfs today? Has
>>> anything changed? Do I have even a remote chance of making it work - and if
>>> it doesn't work, what are my chances of anyo
On 03-05-05 20:34, "George Hartzell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Eirik Øverby writes:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I've been using gmirror for a while to safeguard my system disks. I have
>> taken the slice-based mirror approach, where I use, say, ad0s1 and ad2s1 as
>> providers.
>> On one of my servers, thi
