Tried again this morning with a fresh cvsup from cvsup4.freebsd.org and the
build went to completion.
maxwell# grep -v ^# /etc/make.conf
CPUTYPE?=k8
CFLAGS= -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -m32
CXXFLAGS+= -fconserve-space
MAKE_SHELL?=sh
COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe
INSTALL=install -C
MTREE_FOLLOWS_SYMLINKS=
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:54:59PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> On 20 May 2008, at 12:25, Dave Uhring wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 08:50:14AM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
>>>
>>> In this, your build is explicitly using '/usr/bin/gcc' for the bui
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 01:33:15PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> And when tested does behave the way you describe.
>
> Mark
>
> drugs:9.5.x 13:30 {4371} % bash
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/cvs/9.5.x]$ printenv | grep FOO
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/cvs/9.5.x]$ FOO=ll
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/cvs/9.
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:10:32PM -0400, Josh Carroll wrote:
> > No, even though it is a dual-core system. I did not want to chance a
> > race condition. I simply executed 'make buildworld' initially, then
> > 'make -DNO_CLEAN buildworld' when I encountered problems in the build.
>
> Ok, it was
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:59:18PM -0400, Josh Carroll wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:58:03AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >>
> >> > # export CFLAGS=""
> >>
> >> This does NOT remove CFLAGS from the environment.
> >
> > It does when you shell is bash.
>
> I think what Mark was getting
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:08:22PM -0400, Josh Carroll wrote:
> > The c compiler is the one shipped with 7.0 RELEASE. Except for the 3
> > new header files that I placed from cvsupped sources into /usr/include/sys
> > the entire system is 7.0 RELEASE.
> >
> > Prior to beginning the build I deliber
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:58:03AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > # export CFLAGS=""
>
> This does NOT remove CFLAGS from the environment.
It does when you shell is bash.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 02:01:48PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 03:14:08PM -0500, Dave Uhring wrote:
> >
> > The problem is that gcc is *not* finding the file in the directory
> > referenced by the -I cflag. If I copy the header files to the di
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 06:46:41PM -0500, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> On May 19, 2008, at 1:21 PM, Dave Uhring wrote:
>
>> In any case, that problem has been solved by putting the updated header
>> files
>> in /usr/include/sys and will be properly fixed when I can final
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 02:54:31PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Dave Uhring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > If a -I/some/directory is used as a CFLAG then the *include directive must
> > read
> >
> > #include , *not* #include "driver.h".
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:16:46PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:00:28AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > This picked up src-all using the RELENG_7 tag. I then attempted a
> > buildworld (cd /usr/src && time make -j2 buildworld). It's just begun
> > stage 2.3, but so
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:02:01AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:53:58PM -0500, Dave Uhring wrote:
> >
> > I posted the relevant output from "make buildworld". Copying the 3 new
> > header
> > files from /usr/src/sys/sys t
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:00:28AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> Something I thought of while doing the above: there's been reports in
> the past of problems with buildworld (or building software in general)
> bombing out or behaving oddly due to clock issues on the local machine.
> If you don
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 06:00:39PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> The thing is that a working buildworld doesn't depend on headers from
> /usr/include. One of the first thing it does is install a set of new
> headers in somewhere like /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp. At this point, it might be
> useful to s
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:04:28AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:58:07AM -0500, Dave Uhring wrote:
> >
> > I have repeately nuked /usr/obj. That is not going to put updated header
> > files
> > where they need to be.
>
> It'
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:02:23AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:54:21AM -0500, Dave Uhring wrote:
> >
> > The build is going nowhere without the correct header files in
> > /usr/include/sys.
>
> That appears to indicate that your build e
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:06:19AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:03:34PM -0500, Dave Uhring wrote:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc]$ grep -v ^# make.conf
> > CPUTYPE?=athlon64
> > CFLAGS= -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -m32
>
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 09:59:25AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> Is there breakage of some sort being caused by your make.conf or (less
> probable) your src.conf? Any filesystem corruption (boot single user
> and force fsck on all the filesystems)?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc]$ grep -v ^# make.co
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 09:42:21AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> Is there some reason you're using -DNO_CLEAN, and haven't just nuked
> /usr/obj/* and done buildworld normally? I can't reproduce any of this
> behaviour on any of our RELENG_7 systems.
I have repeately nuked /usr/obj. That is
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 05:42:56PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> On 19 May 2008, at 17:38, Dave Uhring wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 05:07:08PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
>>> This symbol has been added to fcntl.h recently. It appears as if your
>>> buil
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 05:07:08PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
> This symbol has been added to fcntl.h recently. It appears as if your build
> is picking up the installed header rather than the one from the source
> tree. Are you using 'make buildworld'?
Yes, although at this point is it 'make -DN
Sources checked out yesterday, updated this morning using cvsup and
repository at cvsup12.freebsd.org. The build fails in /usr/src/lib/libc
/usr/bin/gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -m32 -march=athlon-mp
-I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../include
-I/usr/src/lib/libc/i386 -D
On Thursday 02 January 2003 05:37 pm, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> Wow, that worked like a charm, the Disk Fitness Test was able to
> repair the bad sectors without any major problems. Really good.
>
> Thanks a lot for that!
The drive will probably fail shortly. Keep your data backed up.
To Unsubsc
On Thursday 02 January 2003 02:50 pm, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> Hello list (sorry for crossposting, hope I am doing the right thing),
>
> I've got the following problem which I hope someone could help me
> with: One of my boxes running FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE has an IBM
> DTLA-307030 (30GB) which worke
On Sunday 14 April 2002 12:10 am, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Actually, generally speaking, mergemaster should be done after the
> installworld. However, this issue does raise an interesting point
> that sometimes the account merge part of it does need to be run
> before.
And not only that, but pre
On Sunday 24 March 2002 05:10 pm, Jesse Geddis wrote:
> holy spam batman! it looks like majordomo is resending old messages.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave Uhring
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:
On Sunday 09 September 2001 08:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I tried to install 4.4-RC4 from ISO image.
> (It was the first time for me to install 4.4-RC's)
>
> Almost was good. But I was confused by the key assignment in
> the mode of selecting packages in sysinstall(8). How should we
> ope
On Wednesday 15 August 2001 14:03, Pete Fritchman wrote:
> ++ 15/08/01 19:00 - - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> | What are the chances of KDE 2.2 making it into the ports tree before
> | 4.4 is - RELEASE'd?
>
> 100%; will has already committed an update! The hardest part right now
> is actually fetchin
On Wednesday 01 August 2001 18:15, Monica Shin wrote:
> I'm sorry if you are reading this. I'm a law student at University of
> Washington (Seattle, WA). This morning, Wednesday, August 1, 2001, a
> friend of mine contacted me regarding the posting of his "signed" email
> that was, I believe, ex
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: JFS
> Dave Uhring wrote:
> > You seem to have missed the critical point of that paper. When the
> > system goes
On Wednesday 13 June 2001 12:45, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
> Trying to newfs the following fs is giving me fits:
>
> newsfeed-inn# disklabel -r twed0
> # /dev/twed0c:
> bytes/sector: 512
> sectors/track: 63
> tracks/cylinder: 255
> sectors/cylinder: 16065
> cylinders: 65418
> sectors/unit: 1050940800
>
On Sunday 13 May 2001 05:29 pm, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> On Sunday, May 13, 2001 12:13:30 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +
>
> | make buildkernel KERNCONF=mykernel failed because
> | /usr/src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c:76 miibus_if.h does not exist.
>
> +--->8
>
> Perhaps you missed the
On Mon, 09 Oct 2000, Christoph Sold wrote:
> Peter Radcliffe wrote:
> > Trent Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably said:
> > > Type 'make install-user' in the StarOffice 5.2 ports directory
> > > while logged in as a "normal user".
> >
> > Already have done.
> >
> > To repeat, when I 'su -m'
33 matches
Mail list logo
