On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 08:43:22PM +, Ben Kelly wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:14:04 +0300, Dan Pelleg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I'm trying to build nanobsd. I get the error below. Any ideas?
>
>
> > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/g
I'm trying to build nanobsd. I get the error below. Any ideas?
-
>>> stage 4.2: building libraries
--
cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/nanobsd.soekris/ MACHINE_ARCH=i38
approaches are also welcome.
--
Dan Pelleg
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 11:54:33AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Fri, June 2, 2006 11:46 am, Dan Pelleg wrote:
> > I just got the D-Link DWL-G520M PCI wireless card. I'm not interested
> > in super-G or any other post-802.11b feature in particular; the
> > reaso
I;GA;;;IU)"
which I commented out. It then completed. But after making, installing, and
kldloading ndis, I see absolutely no output from ndis.
Any hints? Is this more likely to work under 6.1?
--
Dan Pelleg
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mai
Following up on a *very* old post of mine (to current@) which I still get
asked on:
Dan Pelleg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trying to make use of an old system - Compaq deskpro EN 350Mhz, I ran into
> the following problem: If you issue a reboot(8) the machine shuts down, but
>
kage is upgraded
> and its dependent packages are given from the com-
> mand line (including the case where -r is speci-
> fied), build packages for them as well.
...and on the installing side, use -PP.
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:33:58AM -0500, Dan Pelleg wrote:
> > I'm seeing similar stuff, but in ssh-add and scp in the base system.
> [...]
> > ~/ >ldd /usr/bin/ssh-agent
> > /usr/bin/ssh-agent:
r/lib/libssl.so.3
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 263878 Feb 24 05:50 /usr/lib/libssl_p.a
FWIW, in my make.conf I have:
MAKE_KERBEROS4= yes
MAKE_KERBEROS5= yes
And the kernel config has this as the only "cpu" line:
cpu I686_CPU
Can't think of anything else that's non-
hat I expect to receive. How can 'drop session'
> messages be silenced? And what do 'OUCH!' messages mean?
>
> Eugene Grosbein
>
See kern/32600. Unfortunately, the provided patch doesn't apply cleanly
anymore (bitrot). I lost contact with the commiter ever since I
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there are some real high-impact tweaks to be a little bit safer from
> rootkits. one of them is mounting /tmp noexec. drawback: you got to
> remount it exec for make installworld.
I always wondered... Why are remounts permitted in all securelev
11 matches
Mail list logo
