Now that FreeBSD-13 is branched, is there a way of "following" that
branch on a Pi by upgrading from binaries instead of
buildworld/buildkernel? I know that freebsd-update exists, but that
can't be used AFAIK.
--
chs
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org m
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> For most of the failures, we are already aware of them, as a result of
> our periodic runs. So, just filing a PR to say "broken on clang" doesn't
> really help us all that much.
>
I disagree. Just a tiny bit ;-)
If the PR says that USE_GCC=
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Shiv. Nath
wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD Guys,
>
> It is FreeBSD Release 9.0 x64 and i see this log very frequent almost every
> second, And i want to block this IP from reaching my server. i configured
> the PF as following but still see the same logs, it is like it did
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> OriS writes:
>> "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" writes:
>> > On an amd64 system, you should just set it to 0.
>> Well, maybe it'd be a good idea to set it to 0 on amd64 systems for
>> amd64-RELEASE's.
>
> Already done.
>
Mine is 33554432 with
On 4/6/2012 10:53 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
Hi,
After upgrading to RELENG_9 as of yesterday on my amd64 system, cvsup
bombs out with Bus error: 10.
Why use cvsup, when you've got csup? :-)
--
chs
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
On 4/6/2012 7:57 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
Thanks! I should have thought of that myself... There are few bits
under /usr/share that behave the same way but now I know how to deal
with those as well.
Be a little more careful with that. make(1) uses some of files there,
and will bail out if /u
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> You don't need to do those last 2 steps below if you mv /usr/include
> right before you do 'make installworld', FYI.
>
You are completely right.
--
chs,
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Why are /usr/include files installed with "install -C" during "make
> installworld" when almost everything else is installed without the -C
> flag? This makes it harder to track which files were actually
> installed during th
Is it still broken? I get "jail: unknown parameter: allow.nomount"
when starting a newly created jail. It was supposed to be fixed, but
something might reintroduced it?
ref. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165515
--
chs,
___
freebsd-stabl
Cross-building went fine (buildworld, buildkernel), but making the
USB-image seems to not work (At least on my system)
make release TARGET=powerpc TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64
__MAKE_CONF=/dev/null SRCCONF=/dev/null NOPORTS=1 NOSRC=1
...
sh /usr/src/release/powerpc/make-memstick.sh
/usr/obj/usr/src/relea
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Christer Solskogen
> wrote:
>> A overhead of almost 300GB? That seems a bit to much, don't you think?
>> The pool consist of one vdev with two 1,5TB disks and one 3TB in raidz1.
>>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Shawn Webb wrote:
> The `zpool` command does not show all the overhead from ZFS. The `zfs`
> command does. That's why the `zfs` command shows less available space
> than the `zpool` command.
>
A overhead of almost 300GB? That seems a bit to much, don't you think?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
Ups, I forgot to say that this is on FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE and all
filesystems are v28.
--
chs,
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Hi!
I have a zpool called data, and I have some inconsistencies with sizes.
$ zpool iostat
capacity operationsbandwidth
poolalloc free read write read write
-- - - - - - -
data3.32T 761G516 50 56.1M 1
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Release engineering for FreeBSD produces SHA256 checksums for all
> official releases. AFAIK though they're only in the announcement emails and
> not stored anywhere else.
> I can't speak for OpenBSD's release process.
> Tha
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
> As long as I have reliable checksums that match the what the upstream source
> says is the real thing, it doesn't practically matter where I get my images
> from.
Checksums compared to what? How would you know what the correct
checksum
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> FreeBSD currently have very obscure, closed community. To get in touch, you
> need to subscribe to several mail lists, constantly read them, I've just
> found recently (my shame of course) in mail list that there is service (
> pub.allbs
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:27 PM, George Kontostanos
wrote:
> Just out of curiosity or confusion maybe..
>
> Will those commits be included to FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE ?
Almost certain of it, since releng/9.0-branch yet has to be created.
--
chs,
___
freebs
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> Is the procedure for creating new FreeBSD memstick images documented
> anywhere?
>
I'm not sure if its documented but this is how I do it:
(edit /etc/make.conf and /etc/src.conf if necessary)
make buildworld && make buildkernel
Insert usb
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
>
> # Set TXG write limit to a lower threshold. This helps "level out"
> # the throughput rate (see "zpool iostat"). A value of 256MB works well
> # for systems with 4GB of RAM, while 1GB works well for us w/ 8GB on
> # disks which hav
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 25/05/2010 11:40:23, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>> For the record: I'm now running -stable as of last night, compiled
>> without issue on ZFS filesystems throughout. No idea what caused the
>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
> Will try to reboot server now to se if that has any impact.
It seems to have solved it. At least temporary.
--
chs,
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Christer Solskogen
> wrote:
>
>
> Yesterday I installed 8.1-RELEASE on another machine, made a zpool and
> added the same usb device as cache. That machine does not have same
&
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
Yesterday I installed 8.1-RELEASE on another machine, made a zpool and
added the same usb device as cache. That machine does not have same
issue as my other machine.
--
chs,
___
freebsd
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> Since you're running 8.1-RELEASE, can you please test this issue on
> RELENG_8 (8.1-STABLE) and see if it exists there?
>
Sure, I could do that. 8.2-RELEASE isn't that far away, is it? But I
think that Alexander should get the necessary in
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> sysctl -a | grep vfs.zfs.arc
> sysctl -a | grep vm.kmem
> sysctl kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats
>
$ sysctl -a | grep vfs.zfs.arc
vfs.zfs.arc_meta_limit: 1342177280
vfs.zfs.arc_meta_used: 1319657696
vfs.zfs.arc_min: 671088640
vfs.zfs.arc_max: 536
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> Quoting Christer Solskogen (from Tue, 16 Nov
> 2010 14:00:48 +0100):
>
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Alexander Leidinger
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> How do you measure that nothing is read or writt
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Ollivier Robert
wrote:
> According to Christer Solskogen:
>> See, that is why I think it is a ZFS issue. Because I did that.
>> I created a UFS filesystem on the same usb stick. Mounted it and did a
>> "dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/file&quo
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> How do you measure that nothing is read or written to it?
>
I used zpool iostat -v
> Please check with
> gstat -f '^$'
> if there are really no reads/writes to the device (please replace
> with the name of your USB device, e.g. da0)
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> You can easily test it - use the stick as a simple disk device with UFS and
> see how much CPU does it take simply to talk to the device.
See, that is why I think it is a ZFS issue. Because I did that.
I created a UFS filesystem on the same u
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Brian Reichert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:50:50PM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
>> My load on my i7 920 is certainly higher when I add a 8GB usb stick as
>> a ZFS cache device.
>
> USB 1.0? 2.0? Dunno even if that would make a
My load on my i7 920 is certainly higher when I add a 8GB usb stick as
a ZFS cache device.
It seems to use about 10% system load - If I remove the cache device
it drops about 10%. Anyone else seeing this?
With cache device:
CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 10.3% system, 0.0% interrupt, 91.5% idle
Me
I have a machine which works as a prison for a couple of jails. That
particular machine has its /usr/ports, /usr/ports/distfiles, and
/usr/ports/packages mounted via NFS from another FreeBSD machine. The
machine that crases also nullmounts those filesystems into each jail.
I'm not completly sure th
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
> System is booted from 2GB internal USB flash
Be aware that not all USB sticks work as a root device on 8.0-RELEASE.
I've tried a couple of different sticks
that is probed *after* the kernel tries to mount /. It seems to
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Colin wrote:
> Anyone got any pointers?
Could you post your /etc/make.conf?
That said, I recon you build your kernel in a rather wierd way. Delete
/usr/obj/* and run "make cleandir && make cleandir" in /usr/src. Then
build your world and kernel like this "make bu
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> Howdy,
>
Great work, Doug! Thanks.
--
chs
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stab
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:27:55 -0700
security <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christer Solskogen wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:30:05 -0700
> > Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Do you mean using different mirrors? I'm using a supfile f
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:30:05 -0700
Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christer Solskogen wrote:
> > I've tried norway's mirror (my default), the danish, the swedish
> > mirror and the mirror in holland. No change.
> > Just to be sure I also
On Fri, September 29, 2006 10:09, Colin Percival wrote:
> Christer Solskogen wrote:
>
>> /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.
>> c
>> /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.
>> c:81:
>> error:
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p3 amd64
/usr/bin/gcc -O1 -pipe -march=nocona -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE
-I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl
-I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto
-I/files3/build/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto -DOPENSSL_THREADS
-DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA -DNO
Hi!
I got myself a mainboard with the ICH7 chipset. This chipset is supported
in FreeBSD, but on my board it had a problem. It found only 2 of my four
disks (ad0 and ad2) I tried updating to 6.0-stable (from 6.0-release) but
the problem resist.
I found a patch at bsdforums that did indeed work.
Co
41 matches
Mail list logo
