Doug Barton wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
Adrian Chadd wrote:
The project is doing what it can with what people are contributing. If
What if it can accomplish the same or more by simply reorganizing what
it's already doing?
I think that the problem here is that you have no idea how a
Ivan Voras wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
The option provided seems like a fairly good compromise to both
interests. Pick 6.3 (or anything the release team wishes) to support for
a longer period of time. Keep all other releases to 12 month support and
continue doing what I believe is some fairly
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Also, it's not like anyone should have been caught by surprise by
th
Adrian Chadd wrote:
The OP stated "argh argh sky is falling with 6.3!" but hasn't yet
listed PRs which indicate this to be happening.
I'm glad we can agree on something. Providing the PRs is not a lot to
ask. Especially if it provides some forward movement and gets the
support he needs.
I
Adrian Chadd wrote:
The project is doing what it can with what people are contributing. If
What if it can accomplish the same or more by simply reorganizing what
it's already doing? I completely understand the apparent situation - if
you look at it from all angles it appears to be no differen
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Also, it's not like anyone should have been caught by surprise by
the 6.2 EoL; the expiry date has been adver
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Chris Marlatt wrote:
>> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>> Jo Rhett wrote:
>>>> On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>>>> Also, it's not like anyone should have been caught by surprise by
>>>>> the 6.2 EoL
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Also, it's not like anyone should have been caught by surprise by the
6.2 EoL; the expiry date has been advertised since the 6.2 release
itself.
It has changed multiple times. I keep reviewing and findin
韓家標 Bill Hacker wrote:
>
> You haven't indicated what drives are on that controller, or how (RAID?)
> arranged.,, what sort of on-drive or on-controller cahce and policy.
>
> Nor how you measured the '..performs better', which a single
> can often do compared to several of the possible RAID conf
