Re: Hook up idmapd to build in 6-stable?

2007-11-17 Thread Ceri Davies
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:31:04PM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: > I am beginning to dabble with NFSv4 client functionality. I noticed > idmapd is not built in -stable but it has been in -current since > src/sbin/Makefile > v. 1.163 (13 months ago). Should it be hooked up to the build? Thanks A

Re: (audit?) Panic in 6.2-PRERELEASE

2007-01-16 Thread Ceri Davies
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:19:55AM +, Ceri Davies wrote: > > For the last two mornings, my system decided to panic() in the exact > same place. I have dumps from both but they almost exactly the same. > Any pointers on where to go next are welcomed. For the record, this turned

Re: (audit?) Panic in 6.2-PRERELEASE

2007-01-07 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:05:39PM +, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Ceri Davies wrote: > > >>Could you try printing *td->td_ar? Maybe this will give us a clue as to > >>how far it got. In particular, this may be able to more reliably give us

Re: (audit?) Panic in 6.2-PRERELEASE

2007-01-07 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 11:49:56AM +, Robert Watson wrote: > On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Ceri Davies wrote: > > >>>So far it's happened this morning and yesterday morning. I haven't seen > >>>it before that. I don't know the cause so I can't repro

Re: (audit?) Panic in 6.2-PRERELEASE

2007-01-06 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 12:01:51PM +, Robert Watson wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Ceri Davies wrote: > > >On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:34:04PM +, Robert Watson wrote: > >> > >>On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Ceri Davies wrote: > >> > >>>>Much as I w

Re: (audit?) Panic in 6.2-PRERELEASE

2007-01-06 Thread Ceri Davies
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 03:08:57PM +, Ceri Davies wrote: > > How reproduceable is this? > > So far it's happened this morning and yesterday morning. I haven't seen > it before that. I don't know the cause so I can't reproduce it at will, > but the lo

Re: (audit?) Panic in 6.2-PRERELEASE

2007-01-05 Thread Ceri Davies
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:34:04PM +, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Ceri Davies wrote: > > >>Much as I would love to trust the contents of ub there, I suspect they > >>can't be trusted. Could you print the contents of *fp in kern_fstat() in

Re: (audit?) Panic in 6.2-PRERELEASE

2007-01-05 Thread Ceri Davies
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:13:30PM +, Robert Watson wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Ceri Davies wrote: > > >For the last two mornings, my system decided to panic() in the exact same > >place. I have dumps from both but they almost exactly the same. Any > >pointers

(audit?) Panic in 6.2-PRERELEASE

2007-01-05 Thread Ceri Davies
For the last two mornings, my system decided to panic() in the exact same place. I have dumps from both but they almost exactly the same. Any pointers on where to go next are welcomed. Here's the first, and I don't see much in there: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # uname -a FreeBSD shrike.private.submonkey

Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialcomms chapter.sgml

2006-08-24 Thread Ceri Davies
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:20:47PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:18, Ceri Davies wrote: > > [ Forwarded from cvs-doc ] > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:37:19PM +, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > keramida2006-08-23 23:37:19

Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialcomms chapter.sgml

2006-08-24 Thread Ceri Davies
[ Forwarded from cvs-doc ] On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:37:19PM +, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > keramida2006-08-23 23:37:19 UTC > > FreeBSD doc repository > > Modified files: > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialcomms chapter.sgml > Log: > Expand the section `Setting a Faster

Re: NSSWITCH errors in /var/log/cron

2006-02-12 Thread Ceri Davies
On 12 Feb 2006, at 00:31, Brandon Fosdick wrote: I have several machines running 6-STABLE that are showing the error listed below in /var/log/cron every few minutes. Google didn't turn up much of relevance, other than the fact that this might be related to disabling NIS. And, in fast, I ha

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates..

2006-01-12 Thread Ceri Davies
I don't want to get embroiled in this conversation, but I am concerned about the use of GNATS illustrated here. On 12 Jan 2006, at 07:34, Jo Rhett wrote: On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:05:13PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: ports/76013 - patch committed after four months ports/76019 - supe

Re: /boot/nextboot.conf not deactivated after one boot

2006-01-07 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:35:34AM +0100, Marius Nuennerich wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:14:41 + > Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:41:33PM +0100, Marius Nuennerich wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > &

Re: rpcbind lingering on IP no longer specified on command line

2006-01-06 Thread Ceri Davies
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 05:35:28PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Ceri Davies wrote: > > CD> > VK> I had rpcbind running with on two interfaces like this: > CD> > VK> > CD> > VK> rpcbind -h 192.168.100.200 -h 10.0.0.9 > CD>

Re: /boot/nextboot.conf not deactivated after one boot

2006-01-06 Thread Ceri Davies
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:41:33PM +0100, Marius Nuennerich wrote: > Hi folks, > > it seems like /boot/nextboot.conf is neither deleted nor > nextboot_enable set to NO on the first line after a reboot. > So it isn't a one shot anymore as the manpage claims. > > System is 6.0-RELEASE. I think thi

Re: rpcbind lingering on IP no longer specified on command line

2006-01-06 Thread Ceri Davies
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:46:06PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Vivek Khera wrote: > > VK> I had rpcbind running with on two interfaces like this: > VK> > VK> rpcbind -h 192.168.100.200 -h 10.0.0.9 > VK> > VK> Now, I changed rpcbind_flags in /etc/rc.conf to just have the

Panics on BETA5

2005-09-21 Thread Ceri Davies
I can reliably panic a fresh install of 6.0-BETA5 on my laptop by installing the src set from CDROM with "sh install.sh all". To be honest, I believe that the drive on this laptop is on its way out, but I'm no expert. Backtraces attached; let me know what else is required. Ceri -- Only two thi

Re: xf86enableIO error (Feb 2005 Snapshots for FreeBSD available)

2005-02-16 Thread Ceri Davies
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 04:41:14PM +0900, Eitarou Kamo wrote: > I got an io error > "xf86EnableIO: Fatal to open /dev/io for extended I/O" > when running "Xorg -configure". > > Has this snapshot been fixed this problem? Do you have a /dev/io? Do you have "device io" in your kernel configuration?

Re: fsck: broken file system with background check remains broken after bootup

2005-01-04 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:25:20PM +0900, Rob wrote: > An automatic fsck could have fixed the system (I eventually did it manually > in single user mode), but the background check left the system broken. > > So I want to configure 5.3 similar to former 4.10: a full automatic fix of > all fi

Re: dump/restore with ufs2

2004-12-31 Thread Ceri Davies
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 09:53:38PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 05:54:25PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 01:23:50PM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote: > > > When I run the following script, I get a warning message, and I'm

Re: dump/restore with ufs2

2004-12-30 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 01:23:50PM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote: > When I run the following script, I get a warning message, and I'm > wondering if it's ignorable or indicates there is a little more work to be > done in getting dump/restore happy with ufs2... > > $ cd /altroot > $ dump -L -0 -a -f

Re: [PATCH] (was: hushlogin attribute)

2004-12-12 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 02:21:23PM -0800, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > The attached patch of login(1) allows hushlogin and nocheckmail attributes > to work from the user's '.login_conf' as well as from the '/etc/login.conf'. It would be a good idea to send-pr this. Ceri -- Only two things are infin

Re: ULE scheduler broken and not documented

2004-12-08 Thread Ceri Davies
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:21:02PM +, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Hello to all, > > I'm runinng RELENG_5 and I noticed that ULE scheduler is broken. > Shouldn't this be documented in UPDATING? Yes. I thought it was, but you are correct in asserting that it isn't. Ceri -- Only two things are

Re: 4.x can't read 5.x dump?

2004-12-03 Thread Ceri Davies
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:27:07AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 02:24:15PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > Should I expect a dump taken from 4.X to be restorable on 5.X though? > > (I do). > > Yes. Phew. Ceri -- Only two things are infinite

Re: 4.x can't read 5.x dump?

2004-12-03 Thread Ceri Davies
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:40:53PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 10:48:43AM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote: > > > I'm backing up a 5.x machine at the moment with this command: > > > > dump -0Lau -b128 -f - /var | gzip -2 | ssh FreeBSD4 dd of=aacd0s1f.gz > > > > After the dump finis

Re: 4.10 -> 5.3 migration; what happens to vinum volumes?

2004-12-01 Thread Ceri Davies
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:38:38PM +0100, Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 20:58:36 +0000, Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have a 4.10-STABLE machine that I want to migrate to 5.3-STABLE. Most > > of the bases are covered, but I'm not

Re: 4.10 -> 5.3 migration; what happens to vinum volumes?

2004-12-01 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:38:54PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Ceri Davies wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 08:58:36PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > >>I have a 4.10-STABLE machine that I want to migrate to 5.3-STABLE. Most > >>of the bases are covered

Re: 4.10 -> 5.3 migration; what happens to vinum volumes?

2004-11-30 Thread Ceri Davies
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 08:58:36PM +, Ceri Davies wrote: > > I have a 4.10-STABLE machine that I want to migrate to 5.3-STABLE. Most > of the bases are covered, but I'm not sure what to expect for my vinum > volumes. I don't have anything esoteric (see attached con

Re: pkg_add error on STABLE

2004-11-28 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 02:30:50PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:25:59PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:11:06PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 05:21:35AM -0500, Derrick Edwards wrote: > > > &

Re: pkg_add error on STABLE

2004-11-28 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:11:06PM +, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 05:21:35AM -0500, Derrick Edwards wrote: > > Everytime I try to install a package via pkg_add I get the following > > error. > > There is not a packages-5-current directory bu

Re: pkg_add error on STABLE

2004-11-28 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 05:21:35AM -0500, Derrick Edwards wrote: > Everytime I try to install a package via pkg_add I get the following > error. > There is not a packages-5-current directory but there is a > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable directory. > How

4.10 -> 5.3 migration; what happens to vinum volumes?

2004-11-25 Thread Ceri Davies
I have a 4.10-STABLE machine that I want to migrate to 5.3-STABLE. Most of the bases are covered, but I'm not sure what to expect for my vinum volumes. I don't have anything esoteric (see attached config), but can I just expect "sed -i.bak -e 's/vinum/gvinum/' /etc/fstab" to leave me with workin

Re: standard-supfile = stable-supfile with 5.3 ?

2004-11-09 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 05:15:13PM +0900, Rob wrote: > > > The two files > > > > /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile > > /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile > > > > both have > > > >*default release=cvs tag=R

Re: -STABLE was stable for long time (Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS?)

2002-11-17 Thread Ceri Davies
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 01:02:55AM +0100, Thomas Seck wrote: > * Marc G. Fournier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Thomas Seck wrote: > > > >> You have chosen to maintain systems which stretch FreeBSD to its limits > >> and uncover bugs lurking in the code. This is great. But you c

Re: port forward only account?

2002-04-12 Thread Ceri Davies
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 03:17:58PM +0100, Rasputin wrote: > > Bit of an odd one this - I have users I want to allow to > ssh port forward to localhost on his box from certain IPs, but > not to have a shell. > > What's a suitable shell? It should be able to hold a session open, > but not do anyth