Re: 7.2-release/amd64: panic, spin lock held too long

2009-09-27 Thread C. C. Tang
C. C. Tang wrote: Attilio Rao wrote: 2009/9/22 C. C. Tang : I have patched the sched_ule.c and did a make buildkernel & make installkernel (is buildworld and installworld necessary?), rebooted and the machine is running now. I will post here again if there is any update. My server i

Re: 7.2-release/amd64: panic, spin lock held too long

2009-09-21 Thread C. C. Tang
Attilio Rao wrote: 2009/9/22 C. C. Tang : I have patched the sched_ule.c and did a make buildkernel & make installkernel (is buildworld and installworld necessary?), rebooted and the machine is running now. I will post here again if there is any update. My server is up for 3.5 days now

Re: 7.2-release/amd64: panic, spin lock held too long

2009-09-21 Thread C. C. Tang
I have patched the sched_ule.c and did a make buildkernel & make installkernel (is buildworld and installworld necessary?), rebooted and the machine is running now. I will post here again if there is any update. My server is up for 3.5 days now with HyperThreading & powerd enabled. No panic o

Re: 7.2-release/amd64: panic, spin lock held too long

2009-09-18 Thread C. C. Tang
Attilio Rao wrote: 2009/9/17 C. C. Tang : Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading? Attilio Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU with HT (4 cores visible in "top" as a result) Yes, mine is also Atom 330. I cannot test the patch because my mac

Re: 7.2-release/amd64: panic, spin lock held too long

2009-09-17 Thread C. C. Tang
Attilio Rao wrote: 2009/9/17 C. C. Tang : Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading? Attilio Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU with HT (4 cores visible in "top" as a result) Yes, mine is also Atom 330. I cannot test the patch because my mac

Re: 7.2-release/amd64: panic, spin lock held too long

2009-09-16 Thread C. C. Tang
Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading? Attilio Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU with HT (4 cores visible in "top" as a result) Yes, mine is also Atom 330. I cannot test the patch because my machine is also in production now. But I have tested it with hyperthr

Re: 7.2-release/amd64: panic, spin lock held too long

2009-07-22 Thread C. C. Tang
Attilio Rao wrote: 2009/7/22 C. C. Tang : Could that one (on i386) be related? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584 I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference... My machine panic randomly rather than on shutdown and I remembered that it failed to write core dump

Re: 7.2-release/amd64: panic, spin lock held too long

2009-07-21 Thread C. C. Tang
> Could that one (on i386) be related? > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584 > I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference... My machine panic randomly rather than on shutdown and I remembered that it failed to write core dump. It also failed to reboot automatically.

Re: 7.2-release/amd64: panic, spin lock held too long

2009-07-16 Thread C. C. Tang
Attilio Rao wrote: 2009/7/8 Dan Naumov : On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Dan Naumov wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Attilio Rao wrote: 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov : On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote: 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov : I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds