On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 04:00:50AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:43:44PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > We are currently planning to remove the following less-popular 10/100
> > > Ethernet drivers in the March/April timeframe:
> > &g
We are currently planning to remove the following less-popular 10/100
Ethernet drivers in the March/April timeframe:
ae, bm, cs, de, dme, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe
All of these drivers generate warnings in FreeBSD 12 and to the best of
my knowledge, none have cleared th
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:58:05PM -0500, Kurt Lidl wrote:
> Alexander Lochmann writes:
> > According to git commit e3089a (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1463)
> > FreeBSD 12.0 i386 uses separate address spaces for kernel and user
> > space. So basically two memory areas, one in each space, can have
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:01:01AM -0700, Alan Somers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:49 AM Warner Losh wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:09 AM Alan Somers wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:57 PM Warner Losh wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:32 PM Maxim Sobole
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:32:54AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 28.11.2018 4:22, FreeBSD Errata Notices wrote:
>
> > Affects:All supported versions of FreeBSD.
> > Corrected: 2018-10-24 23:17:17 UTC (stable/11, 11.2-STABLE)
> > 2018-11-27 19:45:25 UTC (releng/11.2,
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 09:17:23AM -0500, Paul Mather wrote:
> I updated a system yesterday to the latest 12-STABLE as part of the upcoming
> 12-RELEASE cycle. I've installed several BETA and at least one RC of 12
> since updating from 11-STABLE as part of the 12 cycle and have had no
> problem
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 06:54:01AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence
> > > of a comma
> >
> > If we are now going to evaluate all proposed changes to FreeBS
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes <
> > freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > > > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:06:48PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn,
> > > > smc,
> > > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this th
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, smc,
> > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this thread, and
> > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today.
>
> vr
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:18:22PM +0100, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> Remember, it's not simply deprecating cards less than 1Gig.
>
> I have a card that is 10/100 only, but works fine with the gigabit alc driver:
>
> alc0: port 0x2000-0x207f mem
> 0xe050-0xe053 irq 16 at device 0.0 on p
s a person who has edited every driver in the tree multiple times
in the last year (mostly in an external tree), I will consider this
process successful even if we keep the majority of listed drivers in the
tree.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 09:05:16PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> >>> Pl
list.
The full FCP-0101 is included below.
-- Brooks
---
authors: Brooks Davis
state: feedback
---
# FCP 101: Deprecation and removal of 10/100 Ethernet drivers
Deprecate most 10 and 10/100Mbps Ethernet drivers and remove them before
FreeBSD 13.
## Problem Statement
Each network driver create
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 08:54:15AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 14 April 2018 at 07:31, Magnus Ringman wrote:
> > Hi Brooks, this MFC missed your r331077
> > (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14706) thus stable buildkernel currently
> > breaks on missing those two macros.
>
> Thanks for identifying th
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 01:09:27PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > The nxge(4) driver for the Neterion Xframe-I and Xframe-II 10GbE
> > adapters has obvious bugs (by inspection) and it doesn't appear the
> > company exists any more. We'd like to see if there are any significant
> > users of thi
The nxge(4) driver for the Neterion Xframe-I and Xframe-II 10GbE
adapters has obvious bugs (by inspection) and it doesn't appear the
company exists any more. We'd like to see if there are any significant
users of this device and plan to remove it from FreeBSD-12 if not.
-- Brooks
signature.asc
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:09:44AM -0700, Alan Somers wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:11 AM, Andre Albsmeier <
> andre.albsme...@siemens.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 28-Jan-2018 at 10:32:44 -0600, Mike Karels wrote:
> > > > On 28 Jan 2018, at 15:57, Andre Albsmeier
> > =
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
As previously threatened, I plan to remove NATM support next week. This
includes the drivers en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), and patm(4). None of
these devices have been manufactured in the last 20 years so it is time
to move on.
The planned commit can be seen at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9883
-- B
ge-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
> Behalf Of Brooks Davis
> Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 2:33 AM
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Calling ATM NIC users: en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), patm(4)
>
>
Our current ATM stack supports a small number of NICs that were
current in the late 90s[0]. None of them have been manufactured in a
long time and while you can buy hatm(4) devices on e-bay, it's
increasingly difficult to find a motherboard that will accept them.
I'd like to propose removing supp
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:16:16PM -0700, K. Macy wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 31, 2016, Mark Linimon wrote:
>
> > I'll demur just a bit on your points.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:51:02PM -0700, K. Macy wrote:
> > > "we need a compiler to build the system" (a prebuilt package does that
>
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:53:08AM -0500, Kevin P. Neal wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:22:26PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> > > I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1".
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are
> bugs in this version of clang that I'm having trouble with.
>
> Is compiling a newer (say, 3.7.1) version of clang to target FreeBSD
> supported? I have n
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:15:28PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 24 Jul, Matthieu Volat wrote:
> > I'm not fond of lang/gcc as openmp "provider": if a port use c++, it
> > will cause linkage headaches with libc++ (I never was able to have
> > graphics/darktable working, for example).
>
> You might
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:47:44AM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
>
> On 4/03/2015 8:13 AM, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:20:57PM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> >> Is there a preferred way to buildworld without libncursesw?
> >>
&g
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:20:57PM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> Is there a preferred way to buildworld without libncursesw?
>
> When I add to /etc/src.conf
> WITHOUT_NCURSESW=yes
>
> I find that a buildworld fails due to missing libncursesw.*.
> So what uses libncurses? These guys do
> /usr/
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:22:55PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 21:03, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > When I run "make check-old, the /usr/include/c++/v1 and v1/ext directories
> > are listed as old, but they are still present in BSD.include.dist, so are
> > recreated every time I
ith
> my results.
>
> Kind regards,
> Olav
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:57:22PM +0200, Olav Gr?n?s Gjerde wrote:
> > > It was(sorry) from around 12th June 2012.
> > > But I have another sy
Brooks
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:10:59AM +0200, Olav Gr?n?s Gjerde wrote:
> > > I have a weird problem while building the GENERIC 9-STABLE kernel. After
> > > around 5 minutes of compile time, the
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:10:59AM +0200, Olav Gr?n?s Gjerde wrote:
> I have a weird problem while building the GENERIC 9-STABLE kernel. After
> around 5 minutes of compile time, the process just hangs on same place. No
> error. I've tried compiling different commits from this week with the same
>
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:22:44PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:15:02AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > Not unless you consider adding new functions in a reserved namespace
> > (str*) to be ABI breakage.
>
> Well, what often happens is that when
In CURRENT I have added a number of features to the install(1) command
that are derived from NetBSD. One of them is the -M option
that causes new-style mtree entries to be emitted for each object that
is created in the target. In the interest of compatibility and usability I
removed the previous
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:06:27AM +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >> On 2013-01-16 13:05, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I just updated my stable/9 system after clang3.2 was adde
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:01:00PM +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 2013-01-16 13:05, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> >>
> >> I just updated my stable/9 system after clang3.2 was added. My system
> >> is amd64, both world and kernel are compiled
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 03:27:57PM +, jb wrote:
> Mikhail T. aldan.algebra.com> writes:
>
> >
> > On 23.12.2012 11:48, Chris Rees wrote:
> > > They involve a lot of thought to get right, as well as chmod g-w on
> > > something where you probably meant chmod go-w is a disastrous but
> > > (
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:31:04AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-07-18 14:54, Yanhui Shen wrote:
> > I'm using clang-complete plugin in vim,
> > it claims with libclang.so instead of bin/clang it works better.
> >
> > However libclang.so is not installed by a default "make buildworld && m
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:52:00PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:38 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:30 -0700, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> > > On 10/15/10 12:27, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:04:53AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:02:59PM -0300, M?rcio Luciano Donada wrote:
> Hi,
> We buy some hardware, new, but came with processors exchanged below what
> we ask. However, the manufacturing of hardware, informed us that we
> could install everything and then just replace the processor. how will I
>
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:59:31PM -0500, Xian Chen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use 8.0 Release on my thinkpad T42 laptop and want to connect to the WIFI
> AP near me. The AP is encrypted by WPA2. I also need some root
> certifications installed ( UTN-USERFirst-Hardware ). I install
> /usr/ports/securi
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:27:54AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2010-01-27 22:27, John Baldwin wrote:
>> GPT was defined along with EFI, so many folks assume that you have to use EFI
>> to boot a GPT-labelled disk. However, FreeBSD has its own BIOS-based
>> bootstrap that can handle GPT-label
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 06:45:36PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Hey
>
> I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT
> partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that
> I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel
> D945GCLF2) having s
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 04:04:20PM +0300, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:02:26 +0100
> "Ronald Klop" wrote:
>
> > Does ifconfig_rl0="SYNCDHCP" help?
>
> synchronous_dhclient="YES"
>
> helps for me, ntpdate syncs after I changed rc.conf with it.
Hmm, this sound
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:03:39PM +0300, al...@ulgsm.ru wrote:
>
> Wrong order in /etc/rc.d scripts
>
> ~]>rcorder /etc/rc.d/* | grep -n -e dhclient -e ntp
> 66:/etc/rc.d/ntpdate
> 112:/etc/rc.d/ntpd
> 139:/etc/rc.d/dhclient
>
> Then ifconfig_rl0="DHCP"? ntpdate can`t sync time.
>
>
> It is r
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Peter C. Lai wrote:
> > What happens when you portupgrade? You will have to deal with rebuilding
> > that part of world?
>
> Not unless the shared library version number changes, that's the
> beauty of shared libraries.
Unfortunatly w
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> 2009/9/10 Ken Smith :
> > On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 15:29 +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
>
> >> This seems like a step backwards to me: crash dumps have been left
> >> enabled in 7.x and have proved very useful from the point of view of
> >>
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le Mer 9 sep 09 ? 17:52:57 +0200, Brooks Davis
> ?crivait?:
>
> > I'd rather not mention the "link state changed" message since I'd love
> > to see it go away. How's this?
&g
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 01:06:35PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le Ven 4 sep 09 ? 23:57:47 +0200, Brooks Davis
> ?crivait?:
>
> > This is a know issue with some devices supported by ed(4). You can work
> > around it by changing DHCP to SYNCDHCP which will cause dhclien
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 02:41:48PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 07:38:11PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a machine with the following ethernet PCI card:
> >
> > ed0: port 0xdc00-0xdc1f irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2
> > ed0: WARNING: using obsolet
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 02:05:43PM -0500, Paul A. Procacci wrote:
> Gents,
>
> Since the name changed for my cdce device, booting up the OS fails to
> obtain an address via dhcp on this interface. dhclient works normally
> after the machine is booted and I provide the command on the command lin
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:53:17AM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:53:58PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > I'm seeing essentially the same think on an 8.0-BETA1 box with an 8-disk
> > raidz1 pool. Every once in a while the system makes it to 0.05%
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:32:12AM +1000, Andrew Snow wrote:
> Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
>
>> Strangely, the ETA is jumping all over the place, from 50 hours to 2000+
>> hours. Never seen the percent complete over 0.01% done, but then it
>> goes back to 0.00%.
>
> Are you taking snapshots from cron
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:40:02AM +0300, Dan Naumov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009, Freddie Cash wrote:
> >> >
> >> > This is why we've started using glabel(8) to label our drive
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:56:14PM -0700, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
>
> I've got a 9 sata drive raidz1 array, started at version 6, upgraded to
> version 13. I had an apparent drive failure, and then at some point, a
> kernel panic (unrelated to ZFS.) The reboot caused the device numbers
> to shuff
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 06:18:01PM +0200, Angelo Turetta wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> If you use a value of network_interfaces other than AUTO please speak
>> up so that we can make an intelligent decision about this issue.
>
> Maybe I am wrong, setting network_interfaces is the way I found I ha
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 06:06:48PM -0500, Erik Osterholm wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 12:20:34PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Up till Sunday in 8-current, and for a long time in general
> > network.subr (part of the rc.d system) has emitted a warning that
> > values of network_interfaces other
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 07:22:34AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> > To repeat what I wrote earlier today on another list there's no need
> > to worry about hot plugged or newly added interfaces getting magically
> > configured to do dhcp or anything else[0].
>
> such as detected by services such as bi
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:30:46PM +0200, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
>
> On 2 Jun 2009, at 21:20, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> Up till Sunday in 8-current, and for a long time in general
>> network.subr (part of the rc.d system) has emitted a warning that
>> values of network_interfaces other than AUTO
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 03:51:25PM -0500, David Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:30:46PM +0200, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
> >
> > On 2 Jun 2009, at 21:20, Doug Barton wrote:
> >
> > >Up till Sunday in 8-current, and for a long time in general
> > >network.subr (part of the rc.d system) h
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:40:15PM +0100, Peter Ankerst?l wrote:
> Hi
> Im running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE on my gateway and for the last week or so it
> cant renew its dhcp-lease.
>
> At boot-time it sends a request to broadcast: DHCPREQUEST on fxp0 to
> 255.255.255.255 port 67
> And then it gets a
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:31:48AM -0700, Brian Duke wrote:
> This is very odd.
> I got desperate last night and steeled myself for a reinstall. Copied all
> the known keeper files to an alternate drive including /home, /etc,
> /usr/local/etc and a couple others. It's on a completely separate drive
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:52:32AM +0300, l1nyx...@googlemail.com wrote:
> , FreeBSD-stable.
>
> It's real?
> I have one server with hard to access physically.
>
> Can I update him to new release over ssh only?
It's quite possible if you're careful, but there are plenty of ways to
do
cedure I'm
> >following.
> >>
> >>#cp
> /usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile /root/stand_sup
> >
> >>#vi
> /root/stand_sup
> >><< >>>>>host=cvsup15.us.FreeBSD.
>
> >org
> >><< &g
OK, now I feel like an idiot, I completely misread the middle of your
e-mail. You might still want to check out freebsd-update since it's a
lot quicker than rebuilding, but that's not your issue here.
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:35:55PM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
> [This question wo
[This question would be better to ask on the freebsd-questions list, but see
below.]
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:41:40AM -0700, Brian Duke wrote:
> Hello List,
> I'm trying to upgrade my system from 6_2 to 7_1 and cannot seem to do it.
> Perhaps I'm missing something. Here is the basic procedure I'
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 12:27:58AM -0800, Jonathan Feally wrote:
> Sorry for the cross-post, but this could be either lists problem.
>
> I have 2 boxes running 7-STABLE as of 20081130, both i386 SMP. One is
> running ISC DHCPD 3.0.x from recent ports, and the other dhclient from make
> world.
>
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 08:06:24AM -0400, Randy Pratt wrote:
> The ports tree distribution tarball provided on the installation disks
> is another area that needs some consideration. I suspect that many
> people aren't aware of the need for "adoption":
>
> http://myfreebsd.homeunix.net/hints_n_
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:10:42PM +0200, Rink Springer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 01:03:09PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Finally, consider moving to pf instead, if you really feel ipfw is
> > what's causing your machine to crash. You might be pleasantly surprised
> > by the syntax, an
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:27:37AM +1000, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> How do I get in touch with FreeBSD infrastructure people about mailing list
> set up? Sorry to post here, but I've scoured the web site and cannot find
> anything more appropriate. Is there a [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> something s
cked it up from openbsd when we took their client (which is derived from
an early ISC client). If it's not in the stock isc dhclient-script adding it
would be trivial.
-- Brooks
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:57:41AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:52:35AM +
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:52:35AM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have been bitten by something that obvoiusly
> is a feature, not a bug, but I do not quite understand
> the intentions and reasoning behind it.
>
> I have a host with manual interface and resolver configuration
> a
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:34:01AM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
> >> On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Clifton Royston wrote:
> >>
> >>> Speaking just for myself, I'd love to get a general response from
> >>> people who have run servers on both as to whether 6.3 is on average
> >>> more stable than 6.2.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:09:06PM +0200, Szemer?dy G?bor wrote:
> Hello!
> We have a DHCP server listening on subnet 192.168.42.0. (On the server with
> address 192.168.42.1)
> One of the addresses , lets say 192.168.42.11 , we plan to use as a LTSP
> server for thin clients.
> So we installed t
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 12:57:06PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I've now completed the MFC of basic textdump support to 7.0. Once I've had
> a chance to ping Brooks about it, either he or I will MFC support for
> ddb.conf, which allows configuring textdump and debugging script
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:18:26AM -0600, JD Bronson wrote:
> Can someone kindly tell me the CVS tag to follow the 7.0 patch branch
> (only)?
>
> I am running 7.0Beta1 and want to stay with that only. Nothing newer like
> the 'stable' branch.
>
> It seems that the tag I am using is 7.0-stable?
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:32:42PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> BD> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:09AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> BD> >
> BD> > [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropria
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:09AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
>
> [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> any hints to tune rrdtool with ~30k rrd files (approx 2k target devices)?
>
> machine is mostly IO-boun
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:03:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I connect to my freebsd box via ssh using putty from a WindowsXP
> workstation, I want to run a process on the freebsd box, then close my ssh
> session (closing putty) while keeping the process running.
>
> So I run m
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:47:03PM +0200, Todorov @ Paladin wrote:
> Karel Miklav :
> > Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > I think this has been discussed before. The problem is that FreeBSD's
> > > bootloader doesn't support booting off of such devices, thus you
> > > need to use GRUB or an
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:37:53AM +0100, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:18:54 -0300
> JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I believe the problem here is that
> >
> > ifconfig_nic="inet IP"
> > ifconfig_nic="ether MAC"
> >
> > does not work on one line and does not work on two
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:06:59PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:59:40AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:39:35PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > > &g
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:07:39AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:59:40AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > What do you need to set? It's sets IP and netmask. It doesn't handle
> > broadcast, but I'd be pretty suprised if that's nee
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:23:33PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > > ipv4_addrs_ is a much better replacement IMO. It's easy to
> > > > use and doesn't
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:39:35PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > > FWIW, I still use alias/-alias. Mainly because that's what has
> &
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 05:22:22PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > FWIW, I still use alias/-alias. Mainly because that's what has
> > existed historically, and the term "alias" is what is used in
> > reference to rc.conf ifconfig_iface_aliasX e
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:26:18PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > > Kevin Way wrote:
> > > > > I recently ran into a bug in the jail startup scripts th
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 01:49:08PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:06:56PM -0500, Kevin Way wrote:
> > I recently ran into a bug in the jail startup scripts that caused this
> > command to be executed:
> >
> > ifconfig bce0 -alias
> >
> > It turns out that this comm
ient with the bpf.c from RELENG_6 ( line 285 == -> >=)
> According to the cvs commit log this fixes my problem.
>
> Still leaves me wondering why this was not applied to RELENG_6_1
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Spil.
>
>
> On 05/11/06, Brooks Davis <[EMAI
It should be fixed in STABLE. The particular fixes were to bpf.c so I
belive (but have not verified) that if you grab the latest version of
that file, put it in src/sbin/dhclient/ and rebuild dhclient the
problems will go away.
-- Brooks
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:12:25PM +0100, Spil Oss wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:44:39AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:33:50 -0500
> Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Gotcha - i thought as much... i hoped a dump -0 would save enough info
> > > though. I just neede
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:11:55AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:59:46 -0500
> Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Is there a bigger issue here? anything I can do to help diagnose / debug
> > > this?
> >
> > Po
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:39-0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote:
> > > I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based
> > &
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 12:25:58AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> tonight when I started my laptop, i was welcomed with a very nice panic, which
> was happening JUST when mounting the filesystems.
>
> Some info:
> Fault code : supervisor read, page not present.
> current proce
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote:
> I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based
> services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based
> services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my systems got hold of TCP
> port 995, leaving in
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 11:05:55AM -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
>
> On Oct 8, 2006, at 10:54 , Oliver Fromme wrote:
>
> >Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>[...]
> >>It's really too bad the OpenBSD guys refuse to
> >>incorporate the HP (high-performance) patches into OpenSSH
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:33:13AM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
> On 2006-10-05, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:09:56PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 04:04:47PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:09:56PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 04:04:47PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:21:44PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > >
> > > FreeBSD's USB support has always been somewhat defici
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:21:44PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
>
> FreeBSD's USB support has always been somewhat deficient. For example,
> apcupsd can't talk to their UPSs over the USB bus, even though the software
> itself knows how, because FreeBSD doesn't know what a UPS is and throws up
> i
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:10:10PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:44:07AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:16:12PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > > Hey guys,
> > >
> > > I'm not really on the ball
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:16:12PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm not really on the ball with reading the lists now-a-days, and so
> I've not idea whether this has been discussed already.
>
> On my laptop running 6.2-PRERELEASE the drives always mount dirty, which
> suggests t
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:32:16AM +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 03:25:55PM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:42:30PM +0200, Philippe Pegon wrote:
> >
> > > it's just a me too. On our ftp server (ftp8.fr.freebsd.org), sometimes
> >
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
