> I noticed that the kernel directory was very large compaired to 6.1. Is
> this for debugging and can I safely remove the symbols files I want to
> save some space?
Yes, you can do this safely.
Björn
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
Jamie Bowden schrieb:
On 9/9/06, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, -STABLE is what you should run if you want stable code, right?
No. STABLE means STABLE API.
If you want stable code you run releases. Between releases
stable can become unstable. T
hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) schrieb:
On 12 September 2006, at 02:06, Björn König wrote:
Karl Denninger schrieb:
This is not cool folks.
I think you misunderstood what -STABLE means. (Or maybe I do?)
-STABLE is still a development branch without guarantee of a stable
and working
Vivek Khera schrieb:
On Sep 12, 2006, at 6:23 PM, hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) wrote:
-STABLE is still a development branch without guarantee of a stable
and working operating system.
Hahahahaha... That's ironic...
No, just misinterpretation of which attribute of the system to which
th
Karl Denninger schrieb:
This is not cool folks.
I think you misunderstood what -STABLE means. (Or maybe I do?)
-STABLE is still a development branch without guarantee of a stable and
working operating system. -STABLE guarantees that interfaces remain
stable. If you want reliability then jum
Peter Jeremy schrieb:
On Sat, 2006-Jun-10 19:40:41 +0200, Bjrn Knig wrote:
I did a mistake: I unplugged my digital camera accidentally before I
unmounted the filesystem. *doh* This happens very often, because I'm
very scatterbrained. =)
Your best solution may be to use mtools (ports/emulato
Hello,
I did a mistake: I unplugged my digital camera accidentally before I
unmounted the filesystem. *doh* This happens very often, because I'm
very scatterbrained. =) The kernel will panic and all filesystems remain
unclean in any case now. I know that this is a well know issue and in
past
Kaiwai Gardiner schrieb:
Hi, I am experiencing problems compiling FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE; the
following link has the relevant information:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=97240
The file does exist in the src/contrib/gcc directory, but it seems that
the compiler/installer isn't picking
Mike Jakubik schrieb:
I can compile an amd64 kernel just fine without the option COMPAT_43,
but not i386. Why is this?
/usr/src/sys/modules/linux/../../i386/linux/linux_sysvec.c:36:2: #error
"Unable to compile Linux-emulator due to missing COMPAT_43 option!"
mkdep: compile failed
I don't wan
Dmitry Morozovsky schrieb:
BK> cat /tftpdroot/boot/loader.conf
none
Then loader.conf of your NFS root.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PR
Dmitry Morozovsky schrieb:
Colleagues,
${SUBJ} says almost all. PXEboot leads to
Can't work out which disk we are booting from.
error.
Ungzipping /boot/mfsroot.gz helps
Hello Dmitry,
I can't report any problems regarding this with 6.0-RELEASE. Can you
show me
find /tftproot -type f
Nikolas Britton schrieb:
On 2/28/06, Pete Slagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
loader_logo does not appear in /boot/defaults/loader.conf, at least not
in 6.0-RELEASE-p4. Is that an oversight?
Their are lots of undocumented feature in FreeBSD. loader_color="YES"
AFAIK It was never document in 5.x
Robert Uzzi schrieb:
Can someone shed some light on the following error?
rm -f .depend GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS
CC=cc make -f ../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/Makefile
MAKESRCPATH=../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/CUSTOM-SMP
cc -
Bill Paul schrieb:
People, I'm getting tired of always having to ask for this basic
information. The more I have to ask, the more annoyed I get, and the
less inclined I am to help anyone. The shit you don't think is important?
It's important. So spill it already.
Take it easy. Just refer to
h
David Wolfskill schrieb:
This caught me a bit by surprise. This was on my laptop:
localhost(6.0-S)[2] uname -a
FreeBSD localhost 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #56: Wed Jan 18 07:47:29 PST 200
6 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/common/S3/obj/usr/src/sys/LAPTOP_30W i386
localhost(6.0-S)[3]
As you see,
Hello,
Right now I submitted a problem report with a suggestion for a patch
concerning this. It has the internal identification `bin/90114'.
Björn
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
T
Quirino Santilli wrote:
...and is this directive valid both for the ports and the package system?
It works only for ports.
This behaviour is documented in the introducing comments of
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk
Björn
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Hello Quirino,
add the line
APACHE_PORT=www/apache13-modssl
or
APACHE_PORT=www/apache20
or whatever you like to /etc/make.conf and every port that depends on
Apache will require the specified port.
Regards
Björn
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Hello,
Read also http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/migration-guide.html
Best Regards
Björn
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Krzysztof Kowalik wrote:
And 6.0-BETA2 works fine. Did someone forget to merge some fixes for mpt
from RELENG_5 to RELENG_5_4? [...]
It might be a candidate for an errata notice. Those fixes won't go
without saying into a previously released branch.
Björn
___
Mark Sergeant wrote:
Output from pciconf -lv
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:2 class=0x0c0320 card=0x12340925 chip=0x31041106 rev=0x51
hdr=0x00
vendor= 'VIA Technologies Inc'
device= 'VT6202 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller'
class= serial bus
subclass= USB
The same card
om FreeBSD
5.3-RELEASE or later. Users of older systems wanting to upgrade
6.0-CURRENT will need to update to FreeBSD 5.3 or newer first, then to
FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT."
Björn
--
Björn König ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
student at the Technische Universität Berlin
http://bkoen
Martin wrote:
But I'm impressed by the RELENG_6 results. I think I'm going to
upgrade my system instantly.
Yes, the results are slightly better, even the support of amd64 appears
to be much better, but I would be careful; it's easy to overrate
benchmark results. There is a lot that you can d
You might want to have a look at my private benchmarks too:
http://www.alpha-tierchen.de/dateien/etc/benchmark.html
Björn
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
-«:terror:»- wrote:
How could I fix this error?
Thanks
Start here
http://www.google.com/search?q=xf86enableIO+FreeBSD
Björn
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send a
Hello,
I'm trying to debug a FreeBSD 4.11 kernel that has been compiled with
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
options DDB
The remote machine is running FreeBSD 5.4 and I'm using devel/gdb6. I
have no problems as long as I escape to the debugger after the kernel
was loaded, but I like to trace
Tell the kind of your machine and the content of your make.conf, i.e.
CFLAGS if there are any and so on.
Regards Björn
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Jan Sebosik wrote:
> I`ve klkload-ed msdosfs module, tried disklabel on
/dev/ad0s2
> (which damaged my partition table), but it still something
> about that it cannot mount partition (yeh, mount point
e.g.
> /mnt/c exists :-\ ). Is freebsd so different against
Linux, or NetBSD?
What is the er
Scott Long schrieb:
Are you talking about the AHCI standard, or something else? Can you
provide a reference, please?
I meant in particular ADMA from
http://www.t13.org/project/d1510r1-Host-Adapter.pdf
See also
http://www.pacificdigital.com/talon/whitepaper.pdf
I'm not sure if I mix something up ri
Holtor schrieb:
Does the latest 5.x-STABLE support the Pacific Digital Talon ZL4-150 SATA RAID
Card (U-30245)?
After checking the hardware release notes I'm not sure. Any ideas?
There is no hint that there is a FreeBSD driver implementing the public
ATA host adapter standard. Therefore I think th
David Magda wrote:
It's "daemon", not "demon".
:)
It's a question whether you are British or American or understand it as
a proper name. ;-)
Regards
Björn
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-st
Chris schrieb:
there is also a bug which prevents compiling of ezbounce and psybnc, I
wonder how much testing went into the new gcc compiler or was it just
bundled into the release, considering this is the reccommended release
for production server's now this is a bad oversight, I think the gcc
sho
Michael Nottebrock schrieb:
Use tr [:lower:] [:upper:] instead.
I was wondering about a third-party script which always
worked for years with Solaris. I just didn't realized that
this issue concerns a difference between SysV and BSD.
I tried to set another LANG string and it worked, but now
I see t
Tim Robbins wrote:
For better or worse, this is not the correct way to perform case conversion
in non-ASCII locales on FreeBSD 5 and later. See the COMPATIBILITY section
of the tr(1) manpage for more information.
Thanks a lot for this hint. I will pay more attention to this section.
Regards Björn
_
I am a bit confused. Neither de_DE.ISO-8859-1 nor
de_DE.ISO8859-1 work properly in all cases.
> setenv LANG de_DE.ISO8859-1
> echo abcdef uvwxyz | tr '[a-z]' '[A-Z]'
ABCDEF ÚWXYÝ]
> setenv LANG de_DE.ISO-8859-1
> echo abcdef uvwxyz | tr '[a-z]' '[A-Z]'
ABCDEF UVWXYZ
> perl
perl: warning: Setting lo
It works fine for me. My world and kernel were compiled with
"CPUTYPE?=p3" and "CFLAGS= -O -pipe".
FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Sat Dec 11 18:24:44 CET 2004
Björn
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To u
Rob wrote:
both have
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
although the first one claims to download CURRENT.
And, eh, why is the filename "standard-supfile" and
why not the more obvious "current-supfile" ?
It only claims, but it doesn't bring you -CURRENT. That's the reason why
it should not be re
37 matches
Mail list logo
