> I’m not sure what you meant about Linux distros not categorizing fixes,
> though — with some notable exceptions, most of the big ones certainly tag
> security fixes >separately, which is what allows `unattended-upgrades` on
> Debian/Ubuntu based systems (and `yum-cron` on RHEL) to work so nice
> Admins attentive to security issues will already be tracking CVEs for
> the software they use and mitigating or solving the vulnerability by all
> means available.
>
> By batching updates, FreeBSD is making administrative decisions for
> other people's systems. Some folks don't need to worry abo
\ (oo)\___
> (__)\ )\/\
> ||w |
> || ||
I don't think there are any license issues distributing a FreeBSD
kernel with ZFS statically linked like there are with Linux. For a
long time it wasn't supported an
