On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 12:07:34PM +0200, Marko Cuk wrote:
>
> I have also 84 ipfw rules for firewall ( most of them reset and deny and
> a few dummynet pipes ).
> Is the processor too slow for that ?
Depending on the order of these rules: possibly.
--
Bill Fumerola - se
s
> 296/1024/1024 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
>
> where i can increase amount of mbuf ?
> sysctl say what this variables is readonly :(
options NMBCLUSTERS=8192
or whatever in your kernel.
or
kern.ipc.nmbclusters="8192"# Set the number of mbuf clusters
hat is different then the version you're
> > using now. obrien changed some settings once upon a time that made these
> > incompatabilities, I just don't remember when it was.
>
> this system was built on factory clean disks from cold net scratch on
> 00.10.29.
I
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:58:38PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Grr. Brian, how many bug reports does it take for you to do something
> about this?
This should either be fixed or entirely backed out by 4.2-RELEASE.
No questions asked.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chime
> But cd /sys/etc ; make distribution do.
Thankfully that's not the way we suggest you upgrade you /etc/*. You might
want to check into every piece of documentation that refers to mergemaster.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EM
e cvs and not cvsup so
I'm not really familiar with what cvsup does with dead directories.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
quot; (i.e. ability to
> work with the impact of changes on an OS-wide level) they'll be able to
> sponsor you to -core and be able to stand up for your competence.
In Kris's case, he was just too big a pain in the ass and I had to figure
out some way to make him stop bothering me. ;-&
eplacing csh with tcsh in 4.1-RELEASE was the
> single most ill-conceived action taken by the committers.
I'd argue that allowing posts from your domain is currently holding that position.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /
track -STABLE until I have time to deal with a more involved
> upgrade (including being able to back it out in case something doesn't
> work -- the machine in question is a semi-production system and I can't
> afford to have it stay broken for long).
We've never supported
Just to preemptivly answer your next question...
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 02:49:55PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> > ../../dev/xe/if_xe.c:138: card_if.h: No such file or directory
device xe is a pccard, don't remove pccard and expect it to compile.
> > ../../pci/if_rl.c:119
add something that says "YES FOR THE FOLLOWING CARDS
THAT MEANS YOU NEED TO KEEP THIS LINE, THIS MEANS YOU."
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
ts it to. you booted your
old /kernel, even though /FOO was right there ready to be used.
you probably just recompiled the kernel in place (like we traditionally
used to) and then did a make install which (as POLA would tell us)
installs /kernel.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes
op also has just been my home machine for the
past 2 weeks so that really won't bother me until I have to travel
next.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with &quo
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 07:26:46AM -0400, Tony wrote:
> should I be reading a particular edition of fbsd-stable for 3.5 or are they
> all bunched together?
This mailing list covers both RELENG_3 and RELENG_4.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 12:33:57AM +1200, Mark Ibell wrote:
> Anyone know if Yahoo! are running 4.0-RELEASE or 4.0-STABLE?
For all intents and purposes 4.0-YAHOO, which is a subset of 4.0-STABLE :->
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect / Computer Horizons Corp - CHIMES
e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
e hold up? ;>
Time wasted due to reading/replying to silly mail. ;->
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect
Computer Horizons Corp - CVM
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: 800-252-2421 x128 / Cell: 248-761-7272
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with &q
f all the characters (except single quotes, making it impos-
> sible to put single-quotes in a single-quoted string).
Rod,
Had you actually read his original post you would have seen that the [ wasn't
in single quotes in the example he provided. I have no idea what relevence
the a
e tun 1
> # pseudo-device pty 16
You didn't want to comment 'pty' out.
> [ yadda yadda yadda ]
> // something about npx0 being found on the mb
> // something about npx0 being an INT 16 device
>
I would have looked at the npx0 device that you changed,
and then
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, David Gilbert wrote:
> I have 'options vinum' in the kernel ... and typing 'make' give:
pseudo-device vinum #Vinum concat/mirror/raid driver
--
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
- ph:(800) 252-
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
> What I'd propose is one additional "track".
"Branch" is the typical name for these things.
I'll just offer that bitrot is a serious reason why we don't need
another branch.
As for 'missioncritica
--
>
> I would interpret this as I can get them working somehow in 3.3R.
Why?! "... or if they will be completed" That sounds pretty bleak to me.
--
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
- ph:(800) 252-2421 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Marc Veldman wrote:
> I'm still trying to find out what precisely caused this. Any pointers
> are very welcome !
The makefile being newer then your system.
--
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
- ph:(800) 252-2421 - [EMAI
22 matches
Mail list logo
