Hi,
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I reproduced the previous problem on
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> [...]
>> I reproduced the previous problem on 10-CURRENT from r233917, on the
>> following platform (here running 8.2-RELEASE):
>>
>
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [for the record...]
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
>> 9.0-RELEASE, amd64,
Hi,
[for the record...]
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
> 9.0-RELEASE, amd64, kernel when the box hanged. At the time of the
> hang, the box was running a process with about 28
Hi,
I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out.
All the system were installed through the standard installation
procedure. After unclean reboot, either crash or power-failure, I get
a huge amount of really bad filesystem corruption (read: "silent",
fs-wide, corruptions).
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2012/3/5, Arnaud Lacombe :
>> 9.0-RELEASE (kernel + userland) hanged today while running 2000
>> threads. Next step is to reproduce it with a watchdog+textdump enabled
>> kernel.
>
> And you were still un
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>> 2012/2/29,
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe :
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe
>>> wrote:
>
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2012/2/27, Arnaud Lacombe :
>>>> Hi,
>>&g
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2012/2/27, Arnaud Lacombe :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>> Hi folk
Hi,
2012/2/28 Łukasz Wąsikowski :
> W dniu 2012-02-28 19:55, Arnaud Lacombe pisze:
>
>>> FLOWTABLE on 8.x crashed BGP routers (kern/144917).
>>>
>> no crash dump, no backtrace, no follow-up whatsoever after 1 year and
>> 2 years, what's your points ? You c
Hi,
2012/2/27 Steve Wills :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/27/12 10:53, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
>> W dniu 2012-02-22 23:31, Bjoern A. Zeeb pisze:
>>
>>> You cannot ship that on by default for non-tecnical reasons in a
>>> kernel. Please do not commit a kernel config
Hi,
2012/2/27 Łukasz Wąsikowski :
> W dniu 2012-02-22 23:31, Bjoern A. Zeeb pisze:
>
>> You cannot ship that on by default for non-tecnical reasons in a kernel.
>> Please do not commit a kernel config that can be booted (no LINT cannot be
>> booted) with these on without consulting appropriate
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2012/2/27, Arnaud Lacombe :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
&g
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
> 9.0-RELEASE, amd64, kernel when the box hanged. At the time of the
> hang, the box was running a process with about 2800 threads with heav
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Using igb and/or ixgbe on a reasonably powered server requires 1K mbuf
> clusters per MSIX vector,
> that's how many are in a ring. Either driver will configure 8 queues on a
> system with that many or more
> cores, so 8K clusters per port.
Hi folks,
For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
9.0-RELEASE, amd64, kernel when the box hanged. At the time of the
hang, the box was running a process with about 2800 threads with heavy
IPC between 1400 writers and 1400 readers. The box was in single user
mode (/bin/sh co
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:16 PM, wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> My request for the person documenting the tunings also runs the benchmark to
> ensure expected behaviour.
>
Why should you have to tune anything ? Did you tune the Oracle Server
install ? If not, you should not have to tune the FreeBSD i
Hi,
[resend on the ml, my bad]
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/12/16 Arnaud Lacombe :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
>> wrote:
>>> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
>>&
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA
>
it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is
using a kernel + compiler almost 2 years old, i
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> A FreeBSD 7-STABLE miserably crashes on the following:
>>
>> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
>> cpu
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> A FreeBSD 7-STABLE miserably crashes on the following:
>>
>> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
>> cpu
Hi,
A FreeBSD 7-STABLE miserably crashes on the following:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0xbfef
fault code= supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc05fd1c2
stack pointer = 0x28:0xc0a
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/4/11 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> you've got to be fraking kidding me, aren't you ?
>>
>> Code freeze has happened, no date set. BETA-1, B
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Vlad Galu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>>
>>>&g
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
>>> Had you loved so much to have this information, you would have given
>
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Had you loved so much to have this information, you would have given
>> me credential.
>>
>> I may have filled in all the date from publicly a
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/4/11 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> you've got to be fraking kidding me, aren't you ?
>>
>> Code freeze has happened, no date set. BETA-1, B
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:40 +0400, Andrey Fesenko wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > The 9.0-RELEASE cycle will be tracked here:
>> >
>> > http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.0TODO
>> >
>> > though
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> What is your Wiki name?
>
"ArnaudLacombe"
created this morning, with the same email address as the one I'm
sending this email with.
Thanks,
- Arnaud
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 4 October 2011 16:35, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 4 Oct 2011 16:26, "Arnaud Lacombe" wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>> The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now
>> available. Since this is the first release of a brand new branch
>> I cro
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
>
> The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now
> available. Since this is the first release of a brand new branch
> I cross-post the announcements on both -current and -stable. But
> just so you know most of the developers
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 5:55:09 pm Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got a strange boot failure when booting a FreeBSD 7-stable after a
>> 8-stable kernel, with a FreeBSD 7.4 kernel:
>>
>&g
Hi,
I got a strange boot failure when booting a FreeBSD 7-stable after a
8-stable kernel, with a FreeBSD 7.4 kernel:
pid 100 (fsck_ufs), uid 0: exited on signal 8
pid 101 (fsck_ufs), uid 0: exited on signal 8
WARNING: R/W mount of / denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck
WARNING: R/W mount o
happy. 200MBps is about 18000 1500bytes packet by seconds. I
will not trust the quality of any code which need 10x more resources
available than needed to do the job. Even 1Gbps should be attainable
with only 128k clusters.
- Arnaud
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
&
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Özkan KIRIK wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I wanna share state of test machine. em-7.2.2 driver runs as kld. No hangs.
>
How high is `nmbclusters' ?
Thanks,
- Arnaud
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> Missed packets just mean that some temporary resource shortage or error
>> caused
>> the packet to be dropped. I don't believe this is
Hi Jack,
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Missed packets just mean that some temporary resource shortage or error
> caused
> the packet to be dropped. I don't believe this is indicative of a problem,
> just let it
> keep running, 2 days is good but 2 weeks is better :)
>
> Than
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Mike.
> You wrote 1 марта 2011 г., 17:20:49:
>
>> I have been running with 7.2.2 and so far so good. However, its hard to
>> say in my case as the box I would only periodically see the issue.
> As I wrote to Jack, my NIC hangs
> Have you found a solution to this? I am having the same problems on a
> machine very recently updated (cvsupped + buildworld on 4/14/2005):
> kernel.log:Feb 25 13:46:40 trinity kernel: rl0: discard oversize frame
> (ether type 3db4 flags 3 len 8381 > max 1514)
> kernel.log:Apr 10 14:27:37 trini
42 matches
Mail list logo
