Re: java (openjdk6) segfaults when built with 9-stable clang

2013-07-25 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
On 24/07/2013 10:51, Arnaud Houdelette wrote: Hi I recently upgraded my home NAS from 9.1-RELEASE to 9-stable (r253470 (9.2-BETA1)) I also upgraded my poudriere building jail. Since then, multimedia/xbmc port fails to build in configure stage : java segfaults (sig11). I use

java (openjdk6) segfaults when built with 9-stable clang

2013-07-24 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Hi I recently upgraded my home NAS from 9.1-RELEASE to 9-stable (r253470 (9.2-BETA1)) I also upgraded my poudriere building jail. Since then, multimedia/xbmc port fails to build in configure stage : java segfaults (sig11). I use WITH_CLANG_IS_CC=YES, for world and build-jails. I found foll

Re: DNSSec on FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE causes CPU 100%

2012-02-05 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Hi Just FYI, I just encountered the same issue with bind and DNSSEC. Bind was using 100% CPU, even after a restart. Turns out that were a key in the managed-keys folder which was unreadable by bind (permission issue). Hope It can help. Arnaud Houdelette. On 05/01/2012 01:24, George

Support for multiple acl entries for same user or group in setfacl.

2011-10-10 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
The only way to get this is using -a. But -a this is pretty impractical, as you must specify a position, and cannot import entries from a file. Do you know a practical way to do this easily ? Could we modify setfacl behavior or add a -A option ? Regards, Arnaud Houdelette

Renaming ZFS datasets without unmount.

2011-06-08 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
need to be remounted ... Either I don't understand something, or there's an "error" in the man, or a bug in zfs rename. It could be great if zfs allowed "live" renaming of mounted filesystem, as It can avoid headaches... Thanks Arnaud Houdelette ___

gptzfsboot serial support

2011-06-01 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Hi. I know that there is 2 versions of boot0 : With and Without serial support. Is it the same with gptzfsboot ? How to build gptzfsboot with serial support, setting serial speed at 19200 baud ? Thanks Arnaud Houdelette ___ freebsd-stable

Re: zfs-root and "safe" atomic updates

2011-06-01 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
ems the patch won't apply to 8-stable. How should I proceed to adapt it to 8-stable (if this is possible ?). Or maybe I should juste use HEAD loader ? Thanks again. Arnaud Houdelette ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.

Re: zfs-root and "safe" atomic updates

2011-05-27 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
On Fri, 27 May 2011 14:41:54 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 27/05/2011 14:08 t...@tzim.net said the following: I use zfs on / for quite some time now on 8-stable. Each time I want to update base, I use those steps : - zfs snapshot tank/root@old - zfs clone tank/root@old tank/root.old - csup

Re: Possible ZFS livelock or SCHED_ULE bug ?

2009-12-16 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Ben Kelly wrote: On Dec 16, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Arnaud Houdelette wrote: Hi all ! I got a UniProcessor AMD64 box, with 512 MB ram with 2 ZFS pools as a home-NAS. I got some IO issues since I moved from 7.2 to 8.0. With a GENERIC kernel (or a stripped down one), during high IO activity (as

Possible ZFS livelock or SCHED_ULE bug ?

2009-12-16 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Hi all ! I got a UniProcessor AMD64 box, with 512 MB ram with 2 ZFS pools as a home-NAS. I got some IO issues since I moved from 7.2 to 8.0. With a GENERIC kernel (or a stripped down one), during high IO activity (as a make buildword can cause), I encounter random hangs or deadlocks. top show

Re: freebsd update for 8.0-REL-p1 ?

2009-12-06 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! Now that the rtld patch is available, how do I upgrade using freebsd-update ? freebsd-update -r 8.0-RELEASE-p1 upgrade says: [...] Fetching metadata signature for 8.0-RELEASE-p1 from update4.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 8.0-RELEASE-p1 from upd

Re: Non-responsive 8.0-RC1 (now 8.0-STABLE)

2009-12-06 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2009-Nov-30 19:13:30 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2009-Nov-29 08:56:55 +0100, Thomas Backman wrote: On Nov 28, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote: My main server is running 8.0/amd64 from between RC1 and RC2 and I've recently had a couple of long-d

atacontrol spindown equivalent for ahci/ada

2009-11-26 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Is there a equivalent command (camcontrol something ... ?) to atacontrol spindown when using ahci(4) ? I'd like to continue using this feature to reduce power consumption during night hours. Arnaud ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://li

Re: Can't use gpt labels re-importing pool

2009-11-26 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Scot Hetzel wrote: On 11/26/09, Arnaud Houdelette wrote: Scot Hetzel wrote: On 11/26/09, Arnaud Houdelette wrote: I just upgraded from 7.2 to 8.0. Under 7.2 the pool was like : NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank ONLINE 0 0 0

Can't use gpt labels re-importing pool

2009-11-26 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
I just upgraded from 7.2 to 8.0. Under 7.2 the pool was like : NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ad6p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ad10p1 ONLINE 0

Re: Possible scheduler (SCHED_ULE) bug?

2009-10-26 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Jaime Bozza a écrit : The additional information I have (over the PR) is that: 1) Files over 64K cause the problem, not just larger files I thought it was over 1 MB or so. But maybe I'm wrong. ISTR that I couldn't trigger it with some images of around 70K. I discovered it originall

Re: 8.0-RC1 ZFS-root installscript

2009-10-09 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Philipp Wuensche a écrit : Philipp Wuensche wrote: Feel free to send bugreports to me. Thanks for the bug-reports and feature suggestions! There is a new version available: http://anonsvn.h3q.com/projects/freebsd-patches/export/48/manageBE/create-zfsboot-gpt_livecd.sh New stuff: - su

Re: System is on da0s1, but unable to use da0s2 at all?!

2009-08-03 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: I've a server installed under a fresh FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE and on a single UFS filesystem da0s1a. Surprisingly, I cannot access the unused da0s2 slice (where I want to place the ZFS pool onto): | # id | uid=0(root) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel),5(operator) | # uname -a |

Re: Cannot rm files when ZFS is full

2009-07-30 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
grarpamp a écrit : Yep, the cp /dev/null works to truncate. So I can deal with it. Yep, everything is snapshotted. Yep, this is a Sun issue not a FreeBSD one. FreeBSD should just stay current with the versions and the minimum needed to port... fbsd dev time is valuable elsewhere. I do remember r

Re: Cannot rm files when ZFS is full

2009-07-29 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Mark Stapper a écrit : Christian Walther wrote: 2009/7/29 grarpamp : One week old build... # df -i . Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on ram01/mnt1 239465344 239465344 0 100% 13163 0 100% /mnt1 # ls -aliT zero 20797 -rw-r--r-

Re: ZFS RAIDZ and atacontrol spindown settings

2009-07-22 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Mark Stapper wrote: Arnaud Houdelette wrote: Mark Stapper a écrit : Ivan Voras wrote: 2009/7/21 Mark Stapper : Ivan Voras wrote: Mark Stapper wrote: Good day, I am the proud user of a FreeBSD 7.2 AMD64 system

Re: ZFS RAIDZ and atacontrol spindown settings

2009-07-21 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Mark Stapper a écrit : Ivan Voras wrote: 2009/7/21 Mark Stapper : Ivan Voras wrote: Mark Stapper wrote: Good day, I am the proud user of a FreeBSD 7.2 AMD64 system housing, amongst other things, a data server. My "server"(It's called "Yoshi") runs FreeB

Re: [ATA] and re(4) stability issues

2008-12-10 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
emoved the ral(4) NIC (got a real access point now). You might not want to point the finger at the re(4) driver too fast. Arnaud Houdelette ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Re: ZFS

2008-10-31 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
a bit with multiple simultaneous rsyncs. No glitches. The only failures was when swap was on a zvol instead of the system drive. Even with more ram, it regularely ended in panics or deadlocks (most of the time, deadlocks) under "high" load. Not sure of anything here, but

Re: Re: ZFS performance issues (solved?!)

2008-09-01 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Wes Morgan a écrit : On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, John Birrell wrote: For those people experiencing a performance degradation since the DTrace import, please update your copy of src/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern/opensolaris_kmem.c by either cvsup of direct edit to remove "#define KMEM_DEBUG". Yo

Bad TCP performance with large MTU on 7-stable.

2008-05-29 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
cksum offloading disabled. I also tried with tso disabled. Same results. Is it related to the re(4) driver ? Or to the TCP stack ? Arnaud Houdelette ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stab

Re: ZFS on root and disk write caching.

2008-05-29 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Pawel Jakub Dawidek a écrit : On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 03:00:41PM +0200, Arnaud Houdelette wrote: I'm playing around with ZFS. Currently, I just use it for storage, with a zpool of 4 sata disks. The system and boot disk is still formatted with UFS. As I'm quite pleased with ZF

ZFS on root and disk write caching.

2008-05-21 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
). The wiki states that we may encounter problems with more than one pool in use : is it still the case ? I know the whole ZFS thing is still experimental, but with it's overall performance, it would really be a shame not to give it its chance.

Re: [SO]HO Software RAID5 server: which implementation should I choice?

2008-04-22 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Miroslav Lachman a écrit : Arnaud Houdelette wrote: [...] Geom_raid5 is (unfortunatly ?) not part of Freebsd base. You'll have to download and install the module and utility binaries and follow the (simple) instructions from this website : http://home.tiscali.de/cmdr_faako/graid5-howto

Re: [SO]HO Software RAID5 server: which implementation should I choice?

2008-04-19 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Arnaud Houdelette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Lev Serebryakov a écrit : Hello, freebsd-stable. Does somebody use some software RAID5 on FreeBSD in real production system? I want to build storage server for my home: RAW

Re: ATI SB600 Sata controler isn't detected as such.

2008-04-17 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Andrey V. Elsukov a écrit : Arnaud Houdelette wrote: I removed the jumpers, and drives are recognised as sata300. But I still get the "atacontrol: ioctl(IOCATADEVICES): Device not configured" message. Thanks anyway. It doesn't really bothers me as long as the controler works f

Re: Re: ATI SB600 Sata controler isn't detected as such.

2008-04-17 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Andrey V. Elsukov a écrit : 16.04.08, 19:28, "Arnaud Houdelette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Thanks for the info. The jumper may well be in place. Still it doesn't solve the main issue, that is the controler isn't properly recognised. - it is ok. The generic AH

Re: ATI SB600 Sata controler isn't detected as such.

2008-04-16 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Jeremy Chadwick a écrit : On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 05:11:48PM +0200, Arnaud Houdelette wrote: - sata disks works as sata150 instead of sata300 ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master SATA150 ad6: 238475MB at ata3-master SATA150 ad8: 238475MB at ata4-master SATA150 ad10: 238475MB at ata5-master

ATI SB600 Sata controler isn't detected as such.

2008-04-16 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Hello. Running FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE (csup today) on AMD64. I got a MSI K9AGM3-F motherboard, with ATI SB600 chipset. The PATA controler is well recognised as controller>, but the sata controler is detected as AHCI controller> Two issues there : - sata disks works as sata150 instead of sata300 -

Re: [SO]HO Software RAID5 server: which implementation should I choice?

2008-04-09 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
bit nics. Copy from raid5 to /dev/null gives about 100MB/s Copy from /dev/random to raid5 about 40MB/s I use samba shares. I get about 40MB/s in both ways from another computer on the network (enabling jumbo-frames gives a big boost). Hope my own story can help you in any way. Regards, Arnaud

Re: IP header checksum missing with Realtek 8168, jumbo frames and offloading.

2008-03-03 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Arnaud Houdelette wrote: Pyun YongHyeon a écrit : On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:44:03PM +0100, Arnaud Houdelette wrote: > I encountered connectivity issues with an integrated Realtek 8168 on my > MSI motherboard after enabling jumbo frames on my other box. > Investigating the issue

Re: IP header checksum missing with Realtek 8168, jumbo frames and offloading.

2008-03-03 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Pyun YongHyeon a écrit : On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:44:03PM +0100, Arnaud Houdelette wrote: > I encountered connectivity issues with an integrated Realtek 8168 on my > MSI motherboard after enabling jumbo frames on my other box. > Investigating the issue, I found that the packet

IP header checksum missing with Realtek 8168, jumbo frames and offloading.

2008-03-02 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
I encountered connectivity issues with an integrated Realtek 8168 on my MSI motherboard after enabling jumbo frames on my other box. Investigating the issue, I found that the packets with an ethernet frame of length > 2048 get an IP header of 0x. ping -s 3000 192.168.0.11 ==> fail (ethereal