Re: [CFT] [sys/conf/newvers.sh] Cleanup and additions.

2010-08-10 Thread Anonymous
jhell writes: > On 08/10/2010 19:32, Anonymous wrote: >> jhell writes: >> >>> * Adjust the paths that are checked for binaries to be of only >>> /usr/local/bin and /usr/bin. "/bin" is highly unlikely to hold svn(1), >>> git(1) or hg

Re: comconsole

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Steve Mickeler wrote: > I have been searching the web and testing hi and low, but have yet to see > a straight answer about getting COMCONSOLE working under 3.2 Stable. > > Can anyone shed some light on this ? > COMCONSOLE has been depricated...see sio(4) flags. In additi

stable vs. current question

1999-06-27 Thread Anonymous
The handbook sez: > What is FreeBSD-current not? [...] >3.In any way ``officially supported'' by us. We do our best to > help people genuinely in one of the 3 ``legitimate'' FreeBSD-current > categories, but we simply do not have the time to provide > tech support for it. This

Re: 2.2.8->3.2 woes

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Just an idea ... Maybe you could create a new system disc locally and go to the server location and pop in the new HD. It is possible to build on one machine and then install over the network after testing the software locally. Michael --- Michael C. Vergallen A.k.A. Mad Mike, Sportstraat 28

Re: 2.2.8->3.2 woes

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
> is there any safe way to do this over a network connection? it keeps Serial Console...is your friend... > saying drop into single user mode, but I am not going to have the console > (unless I pay the place I'm colocated at way too much money). Also, I'm > running 2.2.5-RELEASE, but I'm gues

ftpd: some clients can list, some cannot

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Hello, I have a strange problem with a 3.2-stable ftpd, cvsuped last Monday. I've compiled ftpd with INTERNAL_LS=true. When a user is listed in /etc/ftpchroot, they may or may not be able to list the contents of their home directory. The -stable and -current FreeBSD client cannot list the dire

Re: 2.2.8->3.2 woes

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
is there any safe way to do this over a network connection? it keeps saying drop into single user mode, but I am not going to have the console (unless I pay the place I'm colocated at way too much money). Also, I'm running 2.2.5-RELEASE, but I'm guessing the only difference is I'll go 2.2.5-rele

Re: 2.2.8->3.2 woes

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Quoting Tenacious ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I have a 2.2.7-release now and I want to upgrade to 3.2-stable. Anywhere I > can find step by step documentation? Or if you can show me the way. I'd suggest the following steps: 1. install mergemaster from ports (/usr/ports/sysutils/mergemaster) 2. Read t

re: ssh DoS attck? (fwd)

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
are you trying to use ssh through inetd? if not, and I understand ssh correctly, it shouldn't be generating a key for every connection, only once per (configurable) hour. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: 2.2.8->3.2 woes

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
I have a 2.2.7-release now and I want to upgrade to 3.2-stable. Anywhere I can find step by step documentation? Or if you can show me the way. Thanks - Original Message - From: Jordan K. Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: DoS??

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
What does "a small attack" mean? do you have the exploit? can you capture a tcpdump of the attack? if there is an attack I'm sure the folks who have the know-how, would like to know what section of the code may have a bug in it. On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, # rm -rf /* wrote: > > I'm not quite s

Re: DoS??

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
All I can really say is that in the netstat -a.. it was like a syn flood except all the connections were established on the ssh port.. we have figured out that it just overloads the cpu, bringing the load averages to over 500 until it ends.. since ssh has to generate a key, etc.. it takes very lit

Re: DoS??

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Assuming you have the tools to reproduce this at will, why not share some more information? What sort of "small attack", for instance? SB On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, # rm -rf /* wrote: > > I'm not quite sure if this is a DoS.. but on two 3.2-STABLE > machines with different configurations.. on

DoS??

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
I'm not quite sure if this is a DoS.. but on two 3.2-STABLE machines with different configurations.. on two different networks.. after a small attack from different places, the machine locks up.. the ports still respond and there is still a ping reply.. but at the console, there is no key

Re: CDRecord not seeing CD-R

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:01:03 +0400, Alex Povolotsky wrote: >to your kernel, enable POSIX realtime and NEVER try to run any disk-hog like >tcl/tk while writing! Um - I do it all the time. My mailer of choice is exmh. I've run exmh, netscape, audio/video clips seti@home, all while burning CDs w

Re: 2.2.8->3.2 woes

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
> Well, I've tried several things over the past couple of weeks, with the > following results: > > make world - the error i mentioned already > make buildworld - same error These will have already left you somewhat screwed. It's not possible now to expect an automated upgrade to just work since

Re: CDRecord not seeing CD-R

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Alex Povolotsky writes: >I've just set up Tekram 310 SCSI adapter (works ok!), attached a cd-writer >to it, tested it as CD-ROM (works OK!), > >ncr0: rev 0x23 int a irq 9 on pci0.10.0 Alex, you silly boy, add device pass0 to your kernel, enable POSIX realtime and NEVER t