Re: OpenZFS port updated

2020-04-17 Thread Pete Wright
On 4/17/20 2:54 PM, Ryan Moeller wrote: On Apr 17, 2020, at 4:56 PM, Pete Wright wrote: On 4/17/20 11:35 AM, Ryan Moeller wrote: FreeBSD support has been merged into the master branch of the openzfs/zfs repository, and the FreeBSD ports have been switched to this branch. Congratulations on

Re: support of PCIe NVME drives

2020-04-17 Thread Chris
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:17:56 +0200 Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz said Chris wrote on 04/17/2020 05:51: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:57:21 -0700 Mel Pilgrim > list_free...@bluerosetech.com said > >> On 2020-04-16 12:30, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> > Pete Wright wrote on 04/16/2020 20:23: >> >>

Re: OpenZFS port updated

2020-04-17 Thread Matthew Macy
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 1:16 PM Scott Long wrote: > > Is the intention to eventually replace the zfs code in src/ ? Yes. Once the feature gap is filled in and most of the potential POLA violations are fixed. > What will be the long-term relationship between src/ and ports/ for this? OpenZFS use

Re: OpenZFS port updated

2020-04-17 Thread Ryan Moeller
> On Apr 17, 2020, at 4:56 PM, Pete Wright wrote: > > On 4/17/20 11:35 AM, Ryan Moeller wrote: >> FreeBSD support has been merged into the master branch of the openzfs/zfs >> repository, and the FreeBSD ports have been switched to this branch. > Congratulations on this effort - big milestone! >

Re: OpenZFS port updated

2020-04-17 Thread Mel Pilgrim
On 2020-04-17 13:31, Kyle Evans wrote: On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:14 PM Mel Pilgrim wrote: On 2020-04-17 11:35, Ryan Moeller wrote: The FreeBSD platform support in OpenZFS does not yet include all features present in FreeBSD’s ZFS. Some notable changes/missing features include: [...] * pre-m

Re: OpenZFS port updated

2020-04-17 Thread Pete Wright
On 4/17/20 11:35 AM, Ryan Moeller wrote: FreeBSD support has been merged into the master branch of the openzfs/zfs repository, and the FreeBSD ports have been switched to this branch. Congratulations on this effort - big milestone! OpenZFS brings many exciting features to FreeBSD, including:

Re: OpenZFS port updated

2020-04-17 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, > On 17 Apr 2020, at 19:35, Ryan Moeller wrote: > > FreeBSD support has been merged into the master branch of the openzfs/zfs > repository, and the FreeBSD ports have been switched to this branch. > > OpenZFS brings many exciting features to FreeBSD, including: > * native encryption > * im

Re: OpenZFS port updated

2020-04-17 Thread Kyle Evans
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:14 PM Mel Pilgrim wrote: > > On 2020-04-17 11:35, Ryan Moeller wrote: > > The FreeBSD platform support in OpenZFS does not yet include all > > features present in FreeBSD’s ZFS. Some notable changes/missing > > features include: > [...] > > * pre-mountroot zpool.cache loa

Re: OpenZFS port updated

2020-04-17 Thread Scott Long
Is the intention to eventually replace the zfs code in src/ ? What will be the long-term relationship between src/ and ports/ for this? Scott > On Apr 17, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Ryan Moeller wrote: > > FreeBSD support has been merged into the master branch of the openzfs/zfs > repository, and t

Re: OpenZFS port updated

2020-04-17 Thread Mel Pilgrim
On 2020-04-17 11:35, Ryan Moeller wrote: The FreeBSD platform support in OpenZFS does not yet include all features present in FreeBSD’s ZFS. Some notable changes/missing features include: [...] * pre-mountroot zpool.cache loading (for automatic pool imports) To the last point, this mainly effe

OpenZFS port updated

2020-04-17 Thread Ryan Moeller
FreeBSD support has been merged into the master branch of the openzfs/zfs repository, and the FreeBSD ports have been switched to this branch. OpenZFS brings many exciting features to FreeBSD, including: * native encryption * improved TRIM implementation * most recently, persistent L2ARC Of c

Re: support of PCIe NVME drives

2020-04-17 Thread matti k
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:41:49 +0200 Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > Miroslav Lachman wrote on 04/17/2020 08:17: > > > When I go in to menu Configuration / Controllers there is empty list. > Is this expected in case of S130? > > I would really like to fulfil the client needs and run