Miroslav Lachman wrote on 04/17/2020 08:17:
Looking at server specs, the R6515's NVME support is only through the
PERC S150 RAID controller. If that's the case, I'm pretty sure
you're out of luck. The PERC S-series controllers are software-based
RAID that require Dell's Windows or Linux driv
Chris wrote on 04/17/2020 05:51:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:57:21 -0700 Mel Pilgrim
list_free...@bluerosetech.com said
On 2020-04-16 12:30, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Pete Wright wrote on 04/16/2020 20:23:
>>
>>
>> On 4/16/20 11:12 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>>> Kurt Jaeger wrote on 04/16/2020 20:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:57:21 -0700 Mel Pilgrim list_free...@bluerosetech.com
said
On 2020-04-16 12:30, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Pete Wright wrote on 04/16/2020 20:23:
>>
>>
>> On 4/16/20 11:12 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>>> Kurt Jaeger wrote on 04/16/2020 20:07:
>
>> I would try booting via
On 2020-04-16 12:30, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Pete Wright wrote on 04/16/2020 20:23:
On 4/16/20 11:12 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Kurt Jaeger wrote on 04/16/2020 20:07:
I would try booting via UEFI if you can. I just installed a laptop
yesterday which has a nvme root device, it was detecte
Thank you for the advices, however it turns out it was user error.. I swapped
the drive in from an apple machine, the new drive took ada0 and my existing
drive moved to ada1.
I’m just playing with ZFS at the moment and what I didn’t realise is that the
system swap was still assigned to ada0p2 b
Pete Wright wrote on 04/16/2020 23:06:
iDRAC does not allow me to do anything with the drives.
But I booted Linux SystemRescueCd and nvme devices are there visible
in /dev/
printscreen https://ibb.co/sj22Nwg
So I think the HW is OK, but FreeBSD does not recognize the controller?
might be in
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 22:57:10 +0200 Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz said
Chuck Tuffli wrote on 04/16/2020 22:29:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:30 PM Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>>
>> Pete Wright wrote on 04/16/2020 20:23:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/16/20 11:12 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>>
On 4/16/20 1:57 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Chuck Tuffli wrote on 04/16/2020 22:29:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:30 PM Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz>
wrote:
Pete Wright wrote on 04/16/2020 20:23:
On 4/16/20 11:12 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Kurt Jaeger wrote on 04/16/2020 20:07:
I
Chuck Tuffli wrote on 04/16/2020 22:29:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:30 PM Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
Pete Wright wrote on 04/16/2020 20:23:
On 4/16/20 11:12 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Kurt Jaeger wrote on 04/16/2020 20:07:
I would try booting via UEFI if you can. I just
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:30 PM Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>
> Pete Wright wrote on 04/16/2020 20:23:
> >
> >
> > On 4/16/20 11:12 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> >> Kurt Jaeger wrote on 04/16/2020 20:07:
>
> > I would try booting via UEFI if you can. I just installed a laptop
> > y
Navdeep Parhar wrote on 04/16/2020 21:51:
On 4/16/20 12:30 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Pete Wright wrote on 04/16/2020 20:23:
On 4/16/20 11:12 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Kurt Jaeger wrote on 04/16/2020 20:07:
I would try booting via UEFI if you can. I just installed a laptop
yesterday w
On Apr 15, 2020, at 2:35 PM, i...@dijix.com wrote:
I have an issue with gpart, it will not let me delete partition ada0p2
responding with “Device Busy”
The man page gpart(8) says this may be shown if a partition exists but I
cannot seem to delete partition 2 in my case via gpart delete or gpa
On 4/16/20 12:30 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Pete Wright wrote on 04/16/2020 20:23:
>>
>>
>> On 4/16/20 11:12 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>>> Kurt Jaeger wrote on 04/16/2020 20:07:
>
>> I would try booting via UEFI if you can. I just installed a laptop
>> yesterday which has a nvme root device,
Pete Wright wrote on 04/16/2020 20:23:
On 4/16/20 11:12 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Kurt Jaeger wrote on 04/16/2020 20:07:
I would try booting via UEFI if you can. I just installed a laptop
yesterday which has a nvme root device, it was detected by the 12-STABLE
snapshot I used to boot fr
On 4/16/20 12:23 PM, Pete Wright wrote:
I would try booting via UEFI if you can. I just installed a laptop
yesterday which has a nvme root device, it was detected by the
12-STABLE snapshot I used to boot from. no other modifications were
necessary on my end.
I can confirm, NVMe drives tend
On 2020-04-16 11:12, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Kurt Jaeger wrote on 04/16/2020 20:07:
Hi!
I was requested to install FreeBSD 11.3 on a new Dell machine with
only 2
NVME drives in ZFS mirror. The problem is that installer does not see
the
drives. Are there any special procedure to use NVME driv
On 4/16/2020 13:23, Pete Wright wrote:
>
>
> On 4/16/20 11:12 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>> Kurt Jaeger wrote on 04/16/2020 20:07:
>>> Hi!
>>>
I was requested to install FreeBSD 11.3 on a new Dell machine with
only 2
NVME drives in ZFS mirror. The problem is that installer does not
On 4/16/20 11:12 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Kurt Jaeger wrote on 04/16/2020 20:07:
Hi!
I was requested to install FreeBSD 11.3 on a new Dell machine with
only 2
NVME drives in ZFS mirror. The problem is that installer does not
see the
drives. Are there any special procedure to use NVME dr
Kurt Jaeger wrote on 04/16/2020 20:07:
Hi!
I was requested to install FreeBSD 11.3 on a new Dell machine with only 2
NVME drives in ZFS mirror. The problem is that installer does not see the
drives. Are there any special procedure to use NVME drives for
installation a later for booting?
I use
I was requested to install FreeBSD 11.3 on a new Dell machine with only
2 NVME drives in ZFS mirror. The problem is that installer does not see
the drives. Are there any special procedure to use NVME drives for
installation a later for booting?
Drives are described in iDRAC:
Device Descriptio
Am 15.04.2020 um 20:35 schrieb i...@dijix.com:
I have an issue with gpart, it will not let me delete partition ada0p2
responding with “Device Busy”
The man page gpart(8) says this may be shown if a partition exists but I cannot
seem to delete partition 2 in my case via gpart delete or gpart des
Le 16/04/2020 à 16:22, Eugene Grosbein a écrit :
>> But,how was "jail -e" intending to be used, actually ?
>
> "jail -e" mode is used by periodic/weekly/340.noid script to
differentiate parts of mounted file trees
> belonging to the host and to the configured full-blown jails, no
matter started
16.04.2020 16:31, David Marec wrote:
> The manpage and usage output doesn't match.
>
> The manpage tells us that this option should be used alone on the command
> line, as any other command will be discarded.
>
> The usage ouput does not mention the "-r" flag but "cmr" (with a typo).
>
> Both
The manpage and usage output doesn't match.
The manpage tells us that this option should be used alone on the
command line, as any other command will be discarded.
The usage ouput does not mention the "-r" flag but "cmr" (with a typo).
Both suggest that the user can request information about
On 16 Apr 2020, at 10:36, Peter Blok wrote:
Another issue I found with pf was with "set skip on bridge”. It
doesn’t work on the interface group, unless a bridge exists prior to
enabling pf. Makes sense, but I didn’t think of it. Other rules work
fine with interface groups.
I am aware of this
Hi Mark/Kristof,
I have been using ng_bridge for more than a year. It was very stable and it
allowed to have members with different MTU. My jails were using jng to setup
the bridge and I changed iohyve to use ng_bridge.
But I recently switched to if_bridge. I needed to have pf work on a member
Hi Mark,
I wouldn’t expect these changes to make a difference in the
performance of this setup.
My work mostly affects setups with multi-core systems that see a lot of
traffic. Even before these changes I’d expect the if_bridge code to
saturate a wifi link easily.
I also wouldn’t expect ng_b
On 16 Apr 2020, at 8:34, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
Hi!
Thank you for your work!
Do you know if epair suffers from the same issue as tap?
I’ve not tested it, but I believe that epair scales significantly
better than tap.
It has a per-cpu mutex (or more accurately, a mutex in each of its
per-cpu str
28 matches
Mail list logo
