Re: Status of libarchive/bsdtar maintainership

I have created a pull request for the proposed patch. It breaks bsdtar's test "test_missing_file" so I need to investigate. https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/pull/1131 On 02.02.19 00:35, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:19 PM Eugene Grosbein >

Re: Status of libarchive/bsdtar maintainership

Hi Warner and Eugene, our resources at the libarchive project are currently very limited and the progress is slow. The project founder and leader Tim Kientzle is irresponsive for more than a month now. The only active core developers are me and Joerg Sonnenberger (joerg@NetBSD). At the moment Joer

Re: Status of libarchive/bsdtar maintainership

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:19 PM Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 01.02.2019 11:10, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019, 8:22 PM Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > I wonder what is status of our contrib/libarchive and bsdtar/bsdcpio > etc. in mode

Re: Reminder: FCP-101: pending removal of some 10/100 Ethernet drivers

On Fri, Feb 1, 2019, 11:05 AM Brooks Davis On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 04:00:50AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:43:44PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > > We are currently planning to remove the following less-popular 10/100 > > > > Ethernet drivers in the March/April

Re: Reminder: FCP-101: pending removal of some 10/100 Ethernet drivers

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 04:00:50AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:43:44PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > We are currently planning to remove the following less-popular 10/100 > > > Ethernet drivers in the March/April timeframe: > > > > > > ae, bm, cs, de, dme, ed,

[Bug 233006] [regression] [patch] bsdtar aborts creation of archive on ENOENT

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233006 --- Comment #12 from Eugene Grosbein --- (In reply to lgfbsd from comment #11) Creation of UFS snapshots of filesystems having lots of files is inefficient, slow and was prone to deadlocks in 10.3-STABLE (I still run a couple of such hosts

[Bug 233006] [regression] [patch] bsdtar aborts creation of archive on ENOENT

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233006 lgf...@be-well.ilk.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lgf...@be-well.ilk.org ---

[Bug 233006] [regression] [patch] bsdtar aborts creation of archive on ENOENT

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233006 --- Comment #10 from j...@transactionware.com --- (In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #9) Yes, I see your point: Walking the tree is different to command line specified names being absent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 233006] [regression] [patch] bsdtar aborts creation of archive on ENOENT

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233006 --- Comment #9 from Eugene Grosbein --- (In reply to janm from comment #7) The PR 205358 deals with distinct problem concerning input path. I'm talking about files found while walking subdirectories recursively. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 233006] [regression] [patch] bsdtar aborts creation of archive on ENOENT

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233006 --- Comment #8 from Eugene Grosbein --- (In reply to janm from comment #7) This makes it *impossible* to create tar archive of living file system with constantly added/removed temporary files and large directory structure. And this is *reg

[Bug 233006] [regression] [patch] bsdtar aborts creation of archive on ENOENT

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233006 j...@transactionware.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@transactionware.com

Re: Reminder: FCP-101: pending removal of some 10/100 Ethernet drivers

> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:43:44PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > > We are currently planning to remove the following less-popular 10/100 > > Ethernet drivers in the March/April timeframe: > > > > ae, bm, cs, de, dme, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe > > > > All of these drive

Re: Reminder: FCP-101: pending removal of some 10/100 Ethernet drivers

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:43:44PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > We are currently planning to remove the following less-popular 10/100 > Ethernet drivers in the March/April timeframe: > > ae, bm, cs, de, dme, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe > > All of these drivers generate wa