On 05/27/18 00:18, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
> Looks simple mis-merge.
> On hunk 1, original (head) r323831 has "hz / isc->quanta" at 2nd arg,
> while r334229 (stable/11) has "hz / isc->quanta1".
>
> r334228 and before had "hz / isc->quanta - 1", so missingly removed
> " - " instead of " - 1".
>
> An
On 28 May 2018 at 03:42, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 12:49:12PM +, Antoine Brodin wrote:
[...]
>> Hi,
>>
>> This looks normal, from the ldconfig(8) man page:
>>
>> Filenames must conform to the lib*.so.[0-9] pattern in order to be
>> added to the hints file.
> For EL
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 12:49:12PM +, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running 11.2-BETA3/amd64 at r334236, and I've noticed that
> > "ldconfig -m" doesn't behave as expected (or perhaps it's my
> > understanding).
> >
> > This
> Am 27.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Randy Bush :
>
> indeed, that fixes it. thank you.
;-)
BTDTGTT
This is (or was) especially a problem with ezjail’s use of freebsd-update.
Most of the time, freebsd-update works - but when it gets confused, the
quickest solution is often to start from scratc
>> # freebsd-update upgrade -r 11.1-RELEASE
>
> Does it still happen when you run
> rm -rf /var/db/freebsd-update/*
> freebsd-update -r 11.1-RELEASE upgrade
indeed, that fixes it. thank you.
randy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://li
> Am 27.05.2018 um 04:05 schrieb Randy Bush :
>
> # freebsd-update upgrade -r 11.1-RELEASE
Does it still happen when you run
rm -rf /var/db/freebsd-update/*
freebsd-update -r 11.1-RELEASE upgrade
?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
>> # freebsd-update upgrade -r 11.1-RELEASEa
>
> you probably noticed the moment you hit the send button, but in case
> you didn't: Try to update to 11.1-RELEASE instead of 11.1-RELEASEa
typo after paste
# history | grep upgrade
53 freebsd-update upgrade -r 11.1-RELEASE
58 history | grep
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running 11.2-BETA3/amd64 at r334236, and I've noticed that
> "ldconfig -m" doesn't behave as expected (or perhaps it's my
> understanding).
>
> This is what I'm seeing when building security/nss in a chrooted environment:
>
> # l
27.05.2018 16:26, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 27.05.2018 5:29, Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
>> I'm running 11.2-BETA3/amd64 at r334236, and I've noticed that
>> "ldconfig -m" doesn't behave as expected (or perhaps it's my
>> understanding).
>>
>> This is what I'm seeing when building security/nss in a chro
27.05.2018 5:29, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> I'm running 11.2-BETA3/amd64 at r334236, and I've noticed that
> "ldconfig -m" doesn't behave as expected (or perhaps it's my
> understanding).
>
> This is what I'm seeing when building security/nss in a chrooted environment:
>
> # ldconfig -r | grep nss
10 matches
Mail list logo