Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-19 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-19 Thread Eitan Adler
On 19 March 2018 at 18:05, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > We rebuild 11.1-Stable at least every two weeks. Our build on the 7th > Feb is in use on our development boxes, however the rebuild on 22nd > resulted in frequent crashes and our reverting to FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE > r329008. Is anyone actually r

Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-19 Thread David Wolfskill
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:05:33PM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > We rebuild 11.1-Stable at least every two weeks.  Our build on the 7th > Feb is in use on our development boxes, however the rebuild on 22nd > resulted in frequent crashes and our reverting to FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE  > r329008.  Is an

Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-19 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
We rebuild 11.1-Stable at least every two weeks.  Our build on the 7th Feb is in use on our development boxes, however the rebuild on 22nd resulted in frequent crashes and our reverting to FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE  r329008.  Is anyone actually running a Stable that was built after 22nd Feb?  Could you p

Re: FreeBSD 11.1 ixl(4) interface does not negotiate at 100 Mbit/s

2018-03-19 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, > Am 19.03.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Eric Joyner : > I'm guessing these are 10G copper LOMs using X722; those don't support 100Mb > speeds. Your guess is probably correct. Going to re-wire tomorrow. Thanks, everyone. Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen -

Re: Problem with USB <---> UPS management connection

2018-03-19 Thread Glen Barber
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:53:01PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, March 08, 2018 01:16:46 AM Glen Barber wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 08:04:47PM -0500, Mark Saad wrote: > > > > On Mar 7, 2018, at 6:55 AM, wishmaster wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, colleagues! > > > > > > > > Somethin

Re: Problem with USB <---> UPS management connection

2018-03-19 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, March 08, 2018 01:16:46 AM Glen Barber wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 08:04:47PM -0500, Mark Saad wrote: > > > On Mar 7, 2018, at 6:55 AM, wishmaster wrote: > > > > > > Hi, colleagues! > > > > > > Something strange happens with a server. I am attempting to connect > > > managemen

Re: FreeBSD 11.1 ixl(4) interface does not negotiate at 100 Mbit/s

2018-03-19 Thread Eric Joyner
I'm guessing these are 10G copper LOMs using X722; those don't support 100Mb speeds. - Eric On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:41 AM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > any ideas why a current RELENG_11_1 system with ixl(4)

Re: FreeBSD 11.1,11-stable,12-current on Dell H740p raid

2018-03-19 Thread Albert Shih
Le 13/03/2018 à 16:52:15+, Gary Palmer a écrit > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 05:15:53PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > I got issue with Dell PowerEdge R740/R640 server with H740p and FreeBSD > > 11.1-Release, 11-stable, 12-current > > > > In all version I don't able to find the raid

Re: FreeBSD 11.1 ixl(4) interface does not negotiate at 100 Mbit/s

2018-03-19 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi all, > > any ideas why a current RELENG_11_1 system with ixl(4) > onboard interfaces might not negotiate with a switch that > has only fast ethernet? > > status: no carrieron the host > li

Re: FreeBSD 11.1 ixl(4) interface does not negotiate at 100 Mbit/s

2018-03-19 Thread Pieper, Jeffrey E
What is the device id (pciconf -lv)? I'm pretty certain that there aren't any devices supported by ixl that are capable of 100Mb. AFAIK, the X710/X722 BASE-T devices are all 10G/1G. Jeff On 3/19/18, 8:11 AM, "owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org on behalf of Patrick M. Hausen" wrote: Hi all

Re: FreeBSD 11.1 ixl(4) interface does not negotiate at 100 Mbit/s

2018-03-19 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > any ideas why a current RELENG_11_1 system with ixl(4) > onboard interfaces might not negotiate with a switch that > has only fast ethernet? > > status: no carrieron the host > line protocol is down (notconnect)on the switch > > dmesg: > http

FreeBSD 11.1 ixl(4) interface does not negotiate at 100 Mbit/s

2018-03-19 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, any ideas why a current RELENG_11_1 system with ixl(4) onboard interfaces might not negotiate with a switch that has only fast ethernet? status: no carrier on the host line protocol is down (notconnect) on the switch dmesg: https://imgur.

Re: HAST, configuration, this actually looks insane

2018-03-19 Thread Pete French
I aalways found hast very easy to configure - I stopped using it a couple of weeks ago, but up until then we had used it heavily in production. Have found some old config files, which do work, as examples: two machines - catbert-active, catbert-passive. catbert-active is 192.168.10.3, passive