On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 12/16/2016 11:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 06:08:34PM +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
Hi everyone,
A few months ago I got myself a new box and I have been happily running
FreeBSD on it ever since. I noticed that the
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 12/16/2016 11:08, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
Hi everyone,
A few months ago I got myself a new box and I have been happily running
FreeBSD on it ever since. I noticed that the boot was not as fast as I had
expected and I've realized that, while
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2016, at 23:56, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> ...
>>> Yes, this is almost exactly what I have done on a machine that was
>>> originally installed with gptzfsboot on the first p
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 3:01 PM, David Marec
wrote:
> [I had first posted onto the Forum about this issue]
>
> Two months ago,
>
> - next to a call to |`||delete-old-libs`| or `install world`, I don't
> really know -
>
> my box that is following FreeBSD-11 Stable ran into a weird situation.
>
> A
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 10:25 PM, David Marec
wrote:
> In this case, what should be the best solution to clean this up ?
>
> As I said, as far scrubbing the pool didn't show any error, it didn't
> solve the issue.
>
That I don't know. With a nore Unix-like filesystem I'd run fsck; if
scrubbing t
On 17.12.2016 22:15, Brandon Allbery wrote:
You have a directory entry pointing at a freed inode (or zfs equivalent).
ZFS may have mapped this inode that points to nowhere. That makes sense.
In this case, what should be the best solution to clean this up ?
As I said, as far scrubbing the po
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 9:01 PM, David Marec
wrote:
>
> david:~>ls /lib/libjail.so.1
> ls: /lib/libjail.so.1: No such file or directory
> david:~>find /lib -name "libjail.so.1" -print
> /lib/libjail.so.1
> david:~>find /lib -name "libjail.so.1" -ls
> find:
[I had first posted onto the Forum about this issue]
Two months ago,
- next to a call to |`||delete-old-libs`| or `install world`, I don't
really know -
my box that is following FreeBSD-11 Stable ran into a weird situation.
A set of files, especially `/lib/libjail.so.1` are in both states
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Fernando Herrero Carrón
wrote:
> * While getting to FreeBSD's loader seems a bit faster (or maybe that's
> just confirmation bias), bringing up the system does not seem much faster.
>
Aside from working around some buggy boot BIOSes, the main speedup would be
not
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Fernando Herrero Carrón
wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what other functionality will UEFI provide that
> takes up 50M?
>
Multiple UEFI programs for diagnostics and such, possibly including
standalone repair images.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Fernando Herrero Carrón
wrote:
>
> My understanding is that BIOSes still boot through kind of a legacy 32-bit
> path and UEFI boots straight 64-bit with all the bells and whistles. In
> fact:
Actually, they boot through a legacy 16 bit path, with access to only
On 16 Dec 2016, at 23:56, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
>> Yes, this is almost exactly what I have done on a machine that was
>> originally installed with gptzfsboot on the first partition, which was
>> 512K. Since all the partitions on this
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 05:15:12PM +0100, Chris Ernst wrote:
>
> i have been hardly trying to get my Lenovo T460s to suspend *and to resume
> again*.
>
> Eventually the system suspends when i close the lid.
> The power LED is slowly blinking on and off.
>
> That is it! I am not able to resume my
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 10:49:48 +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> > Am 17.12.2016 um 07:12 schrieb Ian Smith :
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:08:34 +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> >> My only reason for wanting to boot with UEFI is faster boot,
> >> everything is working fine otherwise.
> >
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 05:12:13PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:08:34 +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
>
> Hi,
>
> you've had plenty of helpful responses, but nobody has commented on:
>
> > My only reason for wanting to boot with UEFI is faster boot,
> Am 17.12.2016 um 07:12 schrieb Ian Smith :
>
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:08:34 +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
>> My only reason for wanting to boot with UEFI is faster boot,
>> everything is working fine otherwise.
>
> I'm skeptical that UEFI boot would be any or noticeably faster than vi
2016-12-17 9:21 GMT+01:00 Fernando Herrero Carrón :
>
>
> 2016-12-16 23:56 GMT+01:00 Warner Losh :
>
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> > On 16 Dec 2016, at 18:53, Antony Uspensky wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
>> >>> On 12/16/2016 11:39,
2016-12-17 7:12 GMT+01:00 Ian Smith :
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:08:34 +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
>
> Hi,
>
> you've had plenty of helpful responses, but nobody has commented on:
>
> > My only reason for wanting to boot with UEFI is faster boot,
> > everything is worki
2016-12-16 23:56 GMT+01:00 Warner Losh :
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 16 Dec 2016, at 18:53, Antony Uspensky wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> >>> On 12/16/2016 11:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 06:08:3
19 matches
Mail list logo
