Glad to hear that. Thank you.
On Thursday, 15 September 2016, Andrey Cherkashin wrote:
Hi,
I know FreeBSD supports NVMe as root device, but does it support it as boot?
Can’t find any confirmation.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using AMPGpg
Yes but you need to boot with efi as that's the old thing mode that
supports nvme boot. We have an nvme only ZFS box and it works fine
On Thursday, 15 September 2016, Andrey Cherkashin
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know FreeBSD supports NVMe as root device, but does it support it as
> boot? Can’t find any
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:54:12AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, September 15, 2016 08:49:48 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:28:11AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, September 15, 2016 05:41:03 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, S
FreeBSD_STABLE_11-i386 - Build #144 - Fixed:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-i386/144/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-i386/144/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-i386/144/console
Chan
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 10:09:48 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:54:12AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > > > Index: vfs_aio.c
> > > > ===
> > > > --- vfs_aio.c (revision 305811)
> > > > +++ vfs_aio
It would panic in the case that we are going to write into the wrong
process (so about as rare as your issue).
Can I configure automatic reboot (not halted) in this case?
options KDB_UNATTENDED
configures kernel for automatic reboot after panic.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:54:12AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > Index: vfs_aio.c
> > > ===
> > > --- vfs_aio.c (revision 305811)
> > > +++ vfs_aio.c (working copy)
> > > @@ -787,6 +787,8 @@ aio_process_rw(struct kaiocb *jo
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 08:49:48 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:28:11AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, September 15, 2016 05:41:03 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:13:48PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > >
> > > >
Hi,
I know FreeBSD supports NVMe as root device, but does it support it as boot?
Can’t find any confirmation.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using AMPGpg
FreeBSD_STABLE_11-i386 - Build #143 - Failure:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-i386/143/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-i386/143/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-i386/143/console
Ch
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:28:11AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, September 15, 2016 05:41:03 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:13:48PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >
> > > I am have strange issuse with nginx on FreeBSD11.
> > > I am have FreeBSD11 insta
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 05:41:03 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:13:48PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> > I am have strange issuse with nginx on FreeBSD11.
> > I am have FreeBSD11 instaled over STABLE-10.
> > nginx build for FreeBSD10 and run w/o recompile w
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:52:30AM -0700, jungle Boogie wrote:
> On 15 September 2016 at 07:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > Bingo!
> > aio read file by process 1055 placed to same memory address as requested
> > but in memory space of process 1060!
> >
> > This is kernel bug and this bug must
On 15 September 2016 at 07:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> Bingo!
> aio read file by process 1055 placed to same memory address as requested but
> in memory space of process 1060!
>
> This is kernel bug and this bug must be stoped release.
When was it introduced?
--
---
inum: 883510009027
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:13:48PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> I am have strange issuse with nginx on FreeBSD11.
> I am have FreeBSD11 instaled over STABLE-10.
> nginx build for FreeBSD10 and run w/o recompile work fine.
> nginx build for FreeBSD11 crushed inside rbtree lookups: next node
>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:59:38AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:35:04AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
> >
> > > On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > > I am try using 11.0 o
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:35:04AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
> > On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC).
> > > Under high network load and may be addtional c
17 matches
Mail list logo