Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-14 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 02:33:07AM +0300, Oleksandr V. Typlyns'kyi wrote: > Sep 5 Sep 5, 2016 at 00:57 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). > > Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system go to > > unresponsible state -- no reaction

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-14 Thread Oleksandr V. Typlyns'kyi
Sep 5 Sep 5, 2016 at 00:57 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). > Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system go to > unresponsible state -- no reaction to network and console (USB IPMI > emulation). INVARIANTS give to high overhad. Is th

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-14 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:23:20PM +0100, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:13:35AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:04:20PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > > > On 09/15/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:43

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-14 Thread Gary Palmer
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:13:35AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:04:20PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > On 09/15/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:43:06PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > > > > > On 09/15/16 at 12:35

11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-14 Thread Oliver Pinter
On Monday, September 5, 2016, Warner Losh > wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > >> On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >> > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). >

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-14 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:04:20PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > On 09/15/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:43:06PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > > > On 09/15/16 at 12:35P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, h

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-14 Thread hiren panchasara
On 09/15/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:43:06PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > On 09/15/16 at 12:35P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > > > > > On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenk

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-14 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:56:57PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > On 09/15/16 at 12:35P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > > > On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2A

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-14 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:43:06PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > On 09/15/16 at 12:35P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > > > On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2A

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-14 Thread hiren panchasara
On 09/15/16 at 12:35P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). > > > Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system g

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-14 Thread hiren panchasara
On 09/15/16 at 12:35P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). > > > Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system g

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-14 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). > > Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system go to > > unresponsible state -- no reaction to network and

Re: X2APIC support

2016-09-14 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:08:02PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 05:02:21PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > On 14/09/2016 15:49, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > MSR_APICBASE = 0xfee00d00 > > > x2APIC is prohibited but turned on by BIOS > > > > Kostik, ^ >

Re: X2APIC support

2016-09-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 14/09/2016 19:08, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Well, the following might work, but I have no good idea what to do > when BIOS does handoff with x2APIC enabled and directs us to not > enable it. Switching to xAPIC mode is not an option, I suspect. The specification describes a way to transition

Re: X2APIC support

2016-09-14 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 05:02:21PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 14/09/2016 15:49, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > MSR_APICBASE = 0xfee00d00 > > x2APIC is prohibited but turned on by BIOS > > Kostik, ^ Well, the following might work, but I have no good idea what to do when BIOS does h

Re: X2APIC support

2016-09-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 14/09/2016 15:49, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > MSR_APICBASE = 0xfee00d00 > x2APIC is prohibited but turned on by BIOS Kostik, ^ P.S. the format string for the value should have been 0x%016jx. -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.or

Jenkins build is back to stable : FreeBSD_stable_10 #398

2016-09-14 Thread jenkins-admin
See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: X2APIC support

2016-09-14 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:35:39PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 14/09/2016 15:33, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:22:17PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > >> On 14/09/2016 14:36, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:52:19PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wr

Re: X2APIC support

2016-09-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 14/09/2016 15:33, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:22:17PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> On 14/09/2016 14:36, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:52:19PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 13/09/2016 18:22, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Any acces

Re: X2APIC support

2016-09-14 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:22:17PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 14/09/2016 14:36, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:52:19PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> On 13/09/2016 18:22, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > >>> Any access > >>> to the LAPIC registers page in x2APIC mode f

Re: X2APIC support

2016-09-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 13/09/2016 17:59, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > Goggling on X2APIC_OPT_OUT take same result: other OS in this case > downgrade to xAPIC mode. It still does not make any sense for BIOS to turn on x2APIC and then instruct the OS that x2APIC must not be used. -- Andriy Gapon __

Re: X2APIC support

2016-09-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 14/09/2016 14:36, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:52:19PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> On 13/09/2016 18:22, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >>> Any access >>> to the LAPIC registers page in x2APIC mode faults. >> >> Is this a fact? >> I read the following in the specification

Re: X2APIC support

2016-09-14 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:36:34PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:52:19PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > On 13/09/2016 18:22, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > Any access > > > to the LAPIC registers page in x2APIC mode faults. > > > > Is this a fact? > > I read the

Re: X2APIC support

2016-09-14 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:52:19PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 13/09/2016 18:22, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > Any access > > to the LAPIC registers page in x2APIC mode faults. > > Is this a fact? > I read the following in the specification: > > In x2APIC mode, the memory mapped interface