Re: svn commit: r302601 - in head/sys: arm/include arm64/include [__WCHAR_MAX definition mostly]

On 12.07.2016 5:44, Mark Millard wrote: > My understanding of the criteria for __WCHAR_MIN and __WCHAR_MAX: > > A) __WCHAR_MIN and __WCHAR_MAX: same type as the integer promotion of > ___wchar_t (if that is distinct). > B) __WCHAR_MIN is the low value for ___wchar_t as an integer type; not > neces

Re: svn commit: r302601 - in head/sys: arm/include arm64/include [__WCHAR_MAX definition mostly]

https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2016-July/088998.html shows: > Modified: head/sys/arm/include/_types.h > == > --- head/sys/arm/include/_types.h Mon Jul 11 23:15:54 2016 > (r302600) > +++ head/sy

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #307

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 12:44 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 7/11/2016 12:39, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 12:30 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > On 7/11/2016 11:32, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 09:50 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

On 2016-Jul-11, at 1:51 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > Quick top-post just to indicate that I just did gcc 4.2.1 based cross-builds > for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc and TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 and they completed. They > had analogous warnings to what clang (powerpc) and powerpc64-gcc (powerpc64) > produced.

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

Quick top-post just to indicate that I just did gcc 4.2.1 based cross-builds for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc and TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 and they completed. They had analogous warnings to what clang (powerpc) and powerpc64-gcc (powerpc64) produced. I do not have a context to test powerpc64 or powerpc kbo

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #306

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:30 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:04 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>> >>> It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and >>> 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obs

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:04 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> >> It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and >> 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obsolete at this point and were >> for compatibility with pre

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and > 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obsolete at this point and were > for compatibility with pre-2.17.5 versions of binutils. Can you do a test > build

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On 7/11/2016 12:39, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 12:30 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: >> On 7/11/2016 11:32, Ian Lepore wrote: >>> On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 09:50 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger < k...@denninger.net> wrote: >>

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 12:30 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 7/11/2016 11:32, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 09:50 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger < > > > k...@denninger.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Here's the backtrace ... sound

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On 7/11/2016 11:32, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 09:50 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger >> wrote: >> >>> Here's the backtrace ... sounds like expected behavior, which is >>> not-so >>> good all-in for a situation like this. I guess the

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #305

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 09:50 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger > wrote: > > > Here's the backtrace ... sounds like expected behavior, which is > > not-so > > good all-in for a situation like this. I guess the strategy is to > > turn > > off softupdate

Re: freebsd-update fetch/install for 10.2-RELEASE => different kernel/userland patch versions?

Hi! > I currently issued > > freebsd-update fetch > freebsd-update install > > and after reboot have > > freebsd-version -ku > 10.2-RELEASE-p18 > 10.2-RELEASE-p19 > > Please note that kernel version is p18, userland p19. > > Is this intended behavior or is something broken with freebsd-updat

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On 7/11/2016 08:50, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger wrote: > >> Here's the backtrace ... sounds like expected behavior, which is not-so >> good all-in for a situation like this. I guess the strategy is to turn >> off softupdates before attempting such an u

freebsd-update fetch/install for 10.2-RELEASE => different kernel/userland patch versions?

Hi all, I currently issued freebsd-update fetch freebsd-update install and after reboot have freebsd-version -ku 10.2-RELEASE-p18 10.2-RELEASE-p19 Please note that kernel version is p18, userland p19. Is this intended behavior or is something broken with freebsd-update? System in question i

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger wrote: > Here's the backtrace ... sounds like expected behavior, which is not-so > good all-in for a situation like this. I guess the strategy is to turn > off softupdates before attempting such an update so as not to crash the > host machine if th

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obsolete at this point and were for compatibility with pre-2.17.5 versions of binutils. Can you do a test build with the -CFLAGS+= -Wa,-mppc64bridge line removed? -Nathan On

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On 7/11/2016 08:32, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 06:30 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: >> On 7/11/2016 02:57, Ronald Klop wrote: >>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:54:38 +0200, Karl Denninger >>> wrote: >>> Got a (nasty) surprise this afternoon on my sandbox machine. I was updatin

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 06:30 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 7/11/2016 02:57, Ronald Klop wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:54:38 +0200, Karl Denninger > > wrote: > > > > > Got a (nasty) surprise this afternoon on my sandbox machine. > > > > > > I was updating some Raspberry Pi2 machines which

Amazon nous ouvre ses portes, soyez les bienvenus

Découvrez la boutique Crêpes de France sur AmazonVoir la version en ligne http://v5vp.mjt.lu/nl2/v5vp/qqn.html?m=AEoAAEY-nZIiJlsAAAJpQ8QBLf0AAElOAAbDmABXg5XKmtkx9VrZQG2yd9XA58L48wAGeHc&b=9214d67c&e=6f246577&email=freebsd-stable@freebsd.org[http://v5vp.mjt.lu/img/v5vp/b/qhw/m2qh.jpeg][https

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On 7/11/2016 02:57, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:54:38 +0200, Karl Denninger > wrote: > >> Got a (nasty) surprise this afternoon on my sandbox machine. >> >> I was updating some Raspberry Pi2 machines which involved taking the sd >> card out, sticking it in an adapter and plugging i

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #304

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

Is the following something that should be updated something like is indicated below for 11.0-BETA1? Is kboot powerpc64 specific? # svnlite diff /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/Makefile Index: /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/Makefile === --- /usr

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:54:38 +0200, Karl Denninger wrote: Got a (nasty) surprise this afternoon on my sandbox machine. I was updating some Raspberry Pi2 machines which involved taking the sd card out, sticking it in an adapter and plugging it into the sandbox, then mounting the partition and

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #303

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"