Re: make clean failure on 10-stable amd64]

2016-01-29 Thread Steven Hartland
On 29/01/2016 18:24, John wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 06:10:26PM +, Glen Barber wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:47:46PM +, Glen Barber wrote: CC'd smh, who committed an update recently in this file. I have confirmed the failure (but do not understand why I did not see it when te

Re: possible em regression (was Re: svn commit: r294958 - in stable/10: share/man/man4 sys/dev/e1000 sys/dev/ixgb sys/dev/netmap)

2016-01-29 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:41:57PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > No multi queue. Stock GENERIC kernel with a couple of things removed. > hw.em are just the defaults. I will try without TSO > > % ifconfig em0 > em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > options=4209b > Hrm, that's strange, TSO4 shou

Re: ia64 10-stable about r292594: rescue crunchide *.lo unknown executable format

2016-01-29 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:32:39 AM Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I asked about this already in stable@ and ia64@. > Got no reply. Perhaps ia64 has been abandoned in > 10-stable too? If so, I'd like to know. > > If not, I'm getting: > > # pwd > /usr/obj/usr/src/rescue/rescue > # crunchide -k

possible em regression (was Re: svn commit: r294958 - in stable/10: share/man/man4 sys/dev/e1000 sys/dev/ixgb sys/dev/netmap)

2016-01-29 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/29/2016 1:42 PM, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: >> # pciconf -lBvcb em0 >> em0@pci0:13:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x108c15d9 chip=0x108c8086 >> rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> device = '82573E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper)' > > I guess you haven't c

Re: svn commit: r294958 - in stable/10: share/man/man4 sys/dev/e1000 sys/dev/ixgb sys/dev/netmap

2016-01-29 Thread Harry Schmalzbauer
Bezüglich Mike Tancsa's Nachricht vom 29.01.2016 19:08 (localtime): > On 1/27/2016 5:31 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: >> Author: marius >> Date: Wed Jan 27 22:31:08 2016 >> New Revision: 294958 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/294958 >> >> Log: >> Sync the e1000 drivers with what's i

Re: make clean failure on 10-stable amd64]

2016-01-29 Thread John
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 06:10:26PM +, Glen Barber wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:47:46PM +, Glen Barber wrote: CC'd smh, who committed an update recently in this file. I have confirmed the failure (but do not understand why I did not see it when testing the patch...). Steven, can yo

Re: make clean failure on 10-stable amd64]

2016-01-29 Thread Glen Barber
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:47:46PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > CC'd smh, who committed an update recently in this file. I have > confirmed the failure (but do not understand why I did not see it when > testing the patch...). > > Steven, can you please take a look at this? > John, can you please

[no subject]

2016-01-29 Thread John
Bcc: Subject: Re: make clean failure on 10-stable amd64 Reply-To: j...@potato.growveg.org In-Reply-To: <20160129174514.gj1...@albert.catwhisker.org> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:45:14AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:40:05PM +, John wrote: Hi, I get the following

Re: svn commit: r294958 - in stable/10: share/man/man4 sys/dev/e1000 sys/dev/ixgb sys/dev/netmap

2016-01-29 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/27/2016 5:31 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: > Author: marius > Date: Wed Jan 27 22:31:08 2016 > New Revision: 294958 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/294958 > > Log: > Sync the e1000 drivers with what's in head as of r294327, modulo parts > that don't apply to stable/10 (driver

Re: make clean failure on 10-stable amd64]

2016-01-29 Thread Steven Hartland
Investigating, strangely enough this builds and cleans just fine from buildenv. On 29/01/2016 17:47, Glen Barber wrote: CC'd smh, who committed an update recently in this file. I have confirmed the failure (but do not understand why I did not see it when testing the patch...). Steven, can you

Re: make clean failure on 10-stable amd64]

2016-01-29 Thread Glen Barber
CC'd smh, who committed an update recently in this file. I have confirmed the failure (but do not understand why I did not see it when testing the patch...). Steven, can you please take a look at this? Glen On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:42:10PM +, John wrote: > Hi, > > I get the following err

Re: make clean failure on 10-stable amd64

2016-01-29 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:40:05PM +, John wrote: > Hi, > > I get the following error in /usr/src when trying to upgrade my system. > In part of this process, I usually run make clean in /usr/src then go > on to running buildworld. > > The installed system is 10.3-PRERELEASE #0 r294087 > The

make clean failure on 10-stable amd64]

2016-01-29 Thread John
Hi, I get the following error in /usr/src when trying to upgrade my system. In part of this process, I usually run make clean in /usr/src then go on to running buildworld. The installed system is 10.3-PRERELEASE #0 r294087 The sources I'm building from is 295045 Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src

make clean failure on 10-stable amd64

2016-01-29 Thread John
Hi, I get the following error in /usr/src when trying to upgrade my system. In part of this process, I usually run make clean in /usr/src then go on to running buildworld. The installed system is 10.3-PRERELEASE #0 r294087 The sources I'm building from is 295045 Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src