Hej!
Åtkomst till ditt konto är begränsat eftersom vi har märkt att du har betalat
din faktura tva ganger på samma gång, och det är på grund av ett tekniskt fel.
När du bekräftar informationen på kortet, kommer vi att återbetala till ditt
konto
Detaljer :
Beställningsnummer : 87-4484524812668
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer <
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> unloading the kernel module of dahdi-kmod26-2.6.1.r10738 leads to this
> panic:
>
>
wcb4xxp0: <6>Did not do the highestorder stuff
> <6>dahdi: Detected time shift.
> <5>dahdi_echocan_mg2: Regi
One last piece of information I just got: the problem is not specific to
LZJB compression. I switched to LZ4 and get the same sort of panic:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 8; apic id = 28
fault virtual address = 0xff8581c48000
fault code = supervisor read data, page not
Gary Palmer [gpal...@freebsd.org] wrote:
> It used to be that ports had MAKE_JOBS_SAFE in the Makefile to mark that
> the port could be built using parallel compiles with the '-j' argument
> to make. It appears that the logic has been switched and now you have
> to mark them as MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE to
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> 20.09.2013 10:41, Andy Moran wrote:
>
>> WIth the 10-ALPHA2 LiveCD, I get:
gpart: attrib 'active': Device not configured
>>> GPT partitions don't have active attribute. You should omit -i argument.
>>> Just run `gpart
Got another, very similar panic again on recent 9-STABLE (r255602); I
assume the latest 9.2 release candidate is affected too. Anybody have any
idea of what could be causing this, and of a workaround other than turning
compression off?
Unlike the last panic I reported, this one did not occur during
Gary Palmer [gpal...@freebsd.org] wrote:
> It's not a compiler flag, it's a make flag. make -j n will fork off up to
> n compilers to do the build. If you just do "make buildworld" then there
> is no parallel compilation.
>
> It used to be that ports had MAKE_JOBS_SAFE in the Makefile to mark th
On 20 September 2013 11:52, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:49:28AM -0400, Thomas Laus wrote:
>> Gary Palmer [gpal...@freebsd.org] wrote:
>> >
>> > When building kernel & world do you use the '-j' argument to do parallel
>> > builds? AFAIK thats not done by default, but it is for
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:49:28AM -0400, Thomas Laus wrote:
> Gary Palmer [gpal...@freebsd.org] wrote:
> >
> > When building kernel & world do you use the '-j' argument to do parallel
> > builds? AFAIK thats not done by default, but it is for some ports.
> >
> Gary:
>
> I just use the system de
Greetings,
I sent a PR for troubles I was having with ports/gimp, and other programs
(ports) that depend on lang/python (Python-2.7), after an upgrade. In my
quest to find a resolution to this problem, I stumbled on to this PR (patch):
ports/182069: [PATCH] devel/py-gobject: Fix GFlags messages
(
Gary Palmer [gpal...@freebsd.org] wrote:
>
> When building kernel & world do you use the '-j' argument to do parallel
> builds? AFAIK thats not done by default, but it is for some ports.
>
Gary:
I just use the system defaults when building anything. If there is a
'-j' argument passed to the com
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:12:09AM -0400, Thomas Laus wrote:
> > Tom,
> > I have had multiple D510's and now D525's that are part of my test
> > systems, all are 4GB machines and all run the latest (ie 2 days old) 9.X
> > Stable. They're faultless. I have a D510 in production serving 30
> > users
20.09.2013 10:41, Andy Moran wrote:
WIth the 10-ALPHA2 LiveCD, I get:
gpart: attrib 'active': Device not configured
GPT partitions don't have active attribute. You should omit -i argument.
Just run `gpart unset -a active ada0`.
--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
That ran
Le Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:36:43 +0300,
Konstantin Belousov a écrit :
Hello,
> Might be, your issue is that some filesystems do not care about proper
> locking mode for the fifos. UFS carefully disables shared locking for
> VFIFO, but it seems ZFS is not. I can propose the following band-aid,
> wh
> Tom,
> I have had multiple D510's and now D525's that are part of my test
> systems, all are 4GB machines and all run the latest (ie 2 days old) 9.X
> Stable. They're faultless. I have a D510 in production serving 30
> users - yes its a 1G system running, sendmail, squid, samba as PDC.
> It's
On 20/09/2013 19:39, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:38:17PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote:
When using mergemaster with -a I get the following error
*** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot
*** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use
*** Creating and popula
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:38:17PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote:
> I have setup a few machines in the past from CD installer and my current
> machine started with CD install and was then updated from source.
> Currently my machine runs 9.1-RELEASE-p3
>
> Yesterday I started to setup a clean 10.0 inst
On Sep 19, 2013, at 8:16 PM, "Andrey V. Elsukov" wrote:
> On 20.09.2013 06:34, Andy Moran wrote:
>> WIth the 10-ALPHA2 LiveCD, I get:
>>
>> gpart: attrib 'active': Device not configured
>>
>
> GPT partitions don't have active attribute. You should omit -i argument.
> Just run `gpart unset -a
18 matches
Mail list logo
