Re: lock violation in unionfs (9.0-STABLE r230270)

2012-08-09 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
schrieb Attilio Rao am 09.08.2012 20:26 (localtime): > On 8/8/12, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: >> schrieb Pavel Polyakov am 06.03.2012 11:20 (localtime): > mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr /mnt > > insmntque: mp-safe fs and non-locked vp: 0xfe01d96704f0 is not > exclusive locke

Re: lock violation in unionfs (9.0-STABLE r230270)

2012-08-09 Thread Attilio Rao
On 8/8/12, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > schrieb Pavel Polyakov am 06.03.2012 11:20 (localtime): mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr /mnt insmntque: mp-safe fs and non-locked vp: 0xfe01d96704f0 is not exclusive locked but should be KDB: enter: lock violation >>> >>> Pavel

Re: pf nat fails on msk0 from packets deriving from a jail interface

2012-08-09 Thread George Mamalakis
On 08/09/12 20:00, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 02:33:25PM +0300, George Mamalakis wrote: Hi all, Suddenly I am facing a problem on a new PC, using a configuration that I have been using on more than 10 servers for the last few years. The only thing that I find that differs fro