On 20/07/2012 16:02, John Marshall wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, 11:14 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>> Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
>> freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
>>
>> acpi_acad0: On Line
>> acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tr
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, 11:14 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
> freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
>
> acpi_acad0: On Line
> acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times
>
> after this, dead.
>
> What is
Hi,
let me make it very short.
UEFI worked for me during my first installation on a UEFI machine. I moved then
to 10 and still have no problems.
So, if you really fail, install CURRENT and it will work.
Of course you are not running then a release system with all the consequences.
Erich
On Fr
from Zoran Kolic :
> It took me by surprise. The mobo I have on my mind for
> new desktop has uefi instead of bios. It is asus m5a97,
> with 970 chipset, well priced among users on the net.
> How would it behave with 9.1? After all reading, I plan
> to boot it as memory stick and go with simple "g
> > I'm experiencing a kernel panic that appears to be caused by zfs.
> >
> > No errors are making it into /var/log/messages, but here is the
> > error message that appears on my screen after panic (transcribed):
> >
> > panic solaris assert BSWAP_32(sa_hdr_phys->sa_magic) == SA_MAGIC,
> > file:
>
2012/7/19 Greg Bonett :
> Hello,
>
> I'm experiencing a kernel panic that appears to be caused by zfs.
>
> No errors are making it into /var/log/messages, but here is the error
> message that appears on my screen after panic (transcribed):
>
> panic solaris assert BSWAP_32(sa_hdr_phys->sa_magic) ==
Hello,
I'm experiencing a kernel panic that appears to be caused by zfs.
No errors are making it into /var/log/messages, but here is the error
message that appears on my screen after panic (transcribed):
panic solaris assert BSWAP_32(sa_hdr_phys->sa_magic) == SA_MAGIC,
file:
/src/sys/modules/zf
Hi,
I had a hard time booting FreeBSD 8.2 on an IBM X3550M3 which is also
an UEFI maniac one. I could only boot FreeBSD from an USB DVD and
install it from there. Maybe some legacy fallback boot options are
availabe for this mobo. I think they have its user manual on their
website.
Regards,
sorry i forget add file with motherboard config
thanks again :)
El 19/07/12 14:40, Pablo Saldivia escribió:
Hello list
I have a problem with my motherboard, with four 82573L Gigabit
Ethernet Controller integrated,
with freebsd 8.1 only work one ethernet em1 , em0 , em2 and em3 not work
dmes
Hello list
I have a problem with my motherboard, with four 82573L Gigabit Ethernet
Controller integrated,
with freebsd 8.1 only work one ethernet em1 , em0 , em2 and em3 not work
dmesg info
[5.301681] e1000e :03:00.0: Disabling ASPM L1
[5.301706] e1000e :03:00.0: PCI->APIC IRQ
On 07/19/12 20:22, jb wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark intersonic.se> writes:
Hi,
Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
acpi_acad0: On Line
acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times
after this, dead.
What
Per olof Ljungmark intersonic.se> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
> freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
>
> acpi_acad0: On Line
> acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times
>
> after this, dead.
>
> What is supp
- Original Message -
From: "James Snow"
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:05:32PM +0100, Dr Joe Karthauser wrote:
Hi James,
It's almost definitely a memory problem. I'd change it ASAP if I were
you.
I lost about 70mb from my zfs pool for this very reason just a few
weeks ago. Luckily I h
- Original Message -
From: "James Snow"
I have a ZFS server on which I've seen periodic checksum errors on
almost every drive. While scrubbing the pool last night, it began to
report unrecoverable data errors on a single file.
I compared an md5 of the supposedly corrupted file to an
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:05:32PM +0100, Dr Joe Karthauser wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> It's almost definitely a memory problem. I'd change it ASAP if I were
> you.
>
> I lost about 70mb from my zfs pool for this very reason just a few
> weeks ago. Luckily I had enough snapshots from before the rot set
Hi James,
It's almost definitely a memory problem. I'd change it ASAP if I were you.
I lost about 70mb from my zfs pool for this very reason just a few weeks ago.
Luckily I had enough snapshots from before the rot set in to recover most of
what I lost.
Joe
--
Dr Joe Karthauser
On 19 Jul 201
It took me by surprise. The mobo I have on my mind for
new desktop has uefi instead of bios. It is asus m5a97,
with 970 chipset, well priced among users on the net.
How would it behave with 9.1? After all reading, I plan
to boot it as memory stick and go with simple "guided"
install. Someone could
I have a ZFS server on which I've seen periodic checksum errors on
almost every drive. While scrubbing the pool last night, it began to
report unrecoverable data errors on a single file.
I compared an md5 of the supposedly corrupted file to an md5 of the
original copy, stored on different media. T
Oh, and would you please file a PR for this? I've been looking into
ACPI related slowdowns for a while and I'm glad you found a culprit.
Adrian
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsu
Hm! A timer related bug?
I'll CC mav@ on this, as it was his commit (and work in his general area.)
I wonder what's going on - is it something to do with the two ACPI
calls inserted there, or is it something to do with the change in
event timer values?
mav? Any ideas?
Adrian
On 17 July 2012 1
On 07/17/12 15:39, Steve McCoy wrote:
On 7/13/12 9:39 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:47:28 pm Steve McCoy wrote:
On 7/12/12 4:34 PM, Steve McCoy wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Barring that, can you do a binary search of kernels from stable/8
between 8.1
and 8.2 on an 8.1 w
TB --- 2012-07-19 13:26:05 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-19 13:26:05 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-07-19 13
TB --- 2012-07-19 13:04:28 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-19 13:04:28 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-07-19 13
TB --- 2012-07-19 12:45:23 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-19 12:45:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-07-19 12
TB --- 2012-07-19 12:50:51 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-19 12:50:51 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-07-19 12
How it works?
We have a team of resourcers.
You post your contract job.
Our in house resourcers find matching candidates on our 600,000 strong
contractor database for your live role.
We send your live job to the top 100-200 matching candidates.
You receive only the highest quality a
Hi,
Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
acpi_acad0: On Line
acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times
after this, dead.
What is supposed to happen in the next stage?
This laptop worked fine with 9-ST
On 2012-07-18 14:54, Yanhui Shen wrote:
> I'm using clang-complete plugin in vim,
> it claims with libclang.so instead of bin/clang it works better.
>
> However libclang.so is not installed by a default "make buildworld && make
> installworld",
> even with 'WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS="YES"' in src.conf.
T
28 matches
Mail list logo
