Hi stable users.
Like this good guy:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159629&cat=
I'm bad guy also have kernel panic.
Maybe it's doesn't matter good or bad gay you are.
It happened first time around Freebsd 9 ~ beta 2 or three. I don't
remember exactly.
All what I have is
Ξ ~ → cat /e
--- Lun 25/6/12, YongHyeon PYUN ha scritto:
...
>
> Could you narrow down which commit broke bge(4)?
>
Sean Bruno suggested it may be r233495, but I haven't
found the time to revert it.
I will let you know tomorrow.
Pedro.
___
freebsd-stable@free
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:04:44PM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hello;
[...]
> > > Iff I boot Windows first and then reboot to start
> > > FreeBSD the network works fine.
> >
> > This looks strange and I can't narrow down what other
> > changes made
> > since 9.0-RELEASE broke the driver. Would
Thanks for pointer, will check it if I ever
enable background fsck again :)
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/fsck-ufs-running-too-often-tp5720964p5721544.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
On 06/24/2012 06:35, Jakub Lach wrote:
> It boiled down to that:
>
> - fsck in background massively slowed i/o and
> full fsck before starting system is actually
> preferred/faster for most cases.
Try switching to SCHED_4BSD in your kernel conf and see if that helps
with slow i/o during load.
D
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 9:06 AM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:15:19PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Jason Hellenthal
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > At one point it was proven that background fsck was not benefitial.
>>
>>
>> Where can we find this
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:15:19PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Jason Hellenthal
> wrote:
> >
> > At one point it was proven that background fsck was not benefitial.
>
>
> Where can we find this "proof"?
>
It was in the lists amongst many conversations.
-
It boiled down to that:
- fsck in background massively slowed i/o and
full fsck before starting system is actually
preferred/faster for most cases.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/fsck-ufs-running-too-often-tp5720964p5721380.html
Sent from the freebsd-stabl
